End Times Speculation XXIII (ver. 2.0)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Muzhik
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
My former Baptist minister said he would even attempt to teach Revelation - too many camps of belief: pre trib, mid trib, post trib. It wasn’t until I cane into the Catholic Church that Revelation finally made sense (Jeff Cavins and other teachings).
 
In India, there are over a billion registered users of a biometric identification system.
Take a look.
Biometric identification systems span the globe.

The evil isn’t so much physical nature as much as spiritual. A mindset that humans have solutions rather than Christ being The Way is what lures people to death.
 
Last edited:
I remember some tradition dealing with the available open spots for popes names as they are listed in the Vatican. Without rearrangement there’s only room for a couple more. That may be urban legend of some sort.

I had heard that the last pope would be Peter II, and would be traditional.
 
It is Satan’s policy to split us up and divide us, to dislodge us gradually from our rock of strength. And if there is to be a persecution, perhaps it will be then; then, perhaps, when we are all of us in all parts of Christendom so divided, and so reduced, so full of schism, so close upon heresy… then Antichrist will burst upon us in fury as far as God allows him… and Antichrist appear as a persecutor, and the barbarous nations around break in.
—Blessed John Henry Newman, Sermon IV: The Persecution of Antichrist
 
Last edited:
Hmmm… The head of the Jesuit order is commonly called “The Black Pope”.
 
The Pope traditionally wears white, even after Labor Day. The head of the Jesuits controls thousands of priests and religious throughout the world and is perceived as having power that rivals the Pope. The Jesuits don’t wear brown robes or anything like that, they wear black. Ergo, the head of the Jesuits has been nicknamed “The Black Pope.” Not really an issue, even 15 years ago; but lately it seems that the Jesuits, who made their reputation reclaiming and reconverting lands that had fallen to Protestantism; who have been bastions of orthodoxy, lately seem to be … not … quite … so orthodox.
 
Is there some kind of censorship being applied to this thread? I don’t see my recent posts.
 
Except John Hardon SJ; and Luis Ladaria Ferrer, SJ, the Prefect of the CDF. Oh, and the only jesuit I know personally, a parish priest who celebratted the most traditional OF mass I’ve seen. And Pope Francis, obviously.

And numerous other Jesuits, I think.
 
Last edited:
If your posts are being removed it will be for violating community standards, and you will get a warning message to that effect.
 
Discussing the list of phrases wherein Pope Pius XII obtained the title of his autobiographical film (Pastor Angelicus, 1942) hardly seems like a violation of community standards to me.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I’d rather see the Royal House of Habsburg become reascendant. They were (are) a strongly Catholic family. Emperor (Blessed) Karl was brutally starved to death by the Freemasons; he is a Blessed but probably won’t be declared to be a saint, because that would have political repercussions in Hungary, where he had been overthrown.
 
BTW, when I say “brutally starved to death by the Freemasons”, I’m talking about President Woodrow Wilson, a racist totalitarian who was strongly reminiscent of Stalin. But that’s another rant.
 
brutally starved to death = do you mean he was not fed some food?
 
brutally starved to death = do you mean he was not fed some food?
I mean that Kaiser Wilhelm, who had helped start the war, admitted as such and was basically allowed to live the rest of his life in luxury. Karl I of Austria, who wasn’t Emperor when the war started, refused to abdicate and so was blamed for the entire war. He, his pregnant wife, and their children were sent to a small rocky island off the coast of Portugal and forced to live in a damp stone hut, where they were given starvation rations. Karl developed a lung infection, which was made worse because he insisted on giving his rations to his pregnant wife. Eventually he succumbed to a combination of the flu and malnutrition. His daughter was born a month after his death.

Woodrow Wilson was one of the strongest voices insisting on this punishment. The war would have ended a year earlier than it did had the Allied Powers accepted the peace proposal put forth by Emperor Karl; however, Wilson, as a Freemason, was strongly anti-Catholic. He wanted NOTHING to do with any peace proposal that had been touched by the Church. His treatment of the Emperor and Empress were due to his Freemasonry, which insisted that all the old order be dissolved and a New World Order rise from the ashes.
 
Thanks for this information. Wikipedia does not even tell this hidden story of the cause of the death of Blessed Karl…
 
I wanted to talk about a theory I’ve been hearing from two different evangelical pastors/teachers on TV.

They’ve been talking about the corruption of Mankind’s DNA/hybrid humans. They’ve been relating the idea that the “sons of men” mentioned in Genesis is the mating of angels with humans, thus corrupting mankind’s DNA by creating a hybrid human – the Nephilim. And for this reason, God destroyed mankind by the flood–except for Noah whose DNA had not been corrupted.

Now, as to our present day world, they’ve been mentioning various “scientific predictions” saying that by 2030, the vast majority of humans will have some sort of ‘implant’ enabling them to be ‘super humans’ (the military is already implementing some of these things). And for this reason, another ‘corruption’ of mankind’s DNA, Christ will come again and put an end to all of this altering of mankind, which is not what God intends for humans.

They are teaching these things as facts. I’m curious to know what people think. I have my own opinion, but would like to hear others’.
 
I’m thinking it’s more like this:

We know that demons can move physical objects. We also know that demons (being angelic) are much more intelligent than humans. I believe it’s possible that demons created “demon seed” from human genetic material: spermatozoa that contained non-human DNA. What today we would call “transhuman”

Demons, being angelic in nature, can for a time appear as beings of great beauty. Using these forms they would seduce human women into allowing themselves to be “impregnated” using this modified and corrupted spermatozoa and the women’s own eggs. This would be profane and blasphemous foreshadowing of the Incarnation, which required no material help. The purpose would be to insert non-human DNA into the human genome. If successful, it would have prevented G_D from incarnating himself as “True God and True Man”, since “True Man” as defined by Adam would have ceased to exist. Instead, there would have been part-Man/part-animal creatures infecting the genetic line that became the Davidic line.

True or not, all of Scripture exists to teach and warn us. The story of the Nephilm is in Scripture as a message and warning to us: DO NOT MIX TYPES! It’s one thing to insert genetic material from an eggplant into a tomato. Those are both types of plants, so there is no mixing of types. Inserting genetic material from a wolf into a kitten PROBABLY isn’t in violation of this command, because both animals are types of mammals. Inserting genetic material from jellyfish into cats to make glow-in-the-dark kittens IS in violation of that warning, since jellyfish are types of “fish” (creatures that live in water) and are of a different “type” of animal than kittens are.

Humans are truly unique – there truly are NO other creatures that match us for “type”. Any mixing of genetic material from any other “type” of G_D’s creation with the human genome would be THE definition of “abomination.” This is even if the intent is to “fix” a genetic “abnormality”. If the mixture is successful, then the modification is permanent – It will be passed on to the next generation and the following generations. And let’s face it: we have NO BLEEDIN’ WAY OF KNOWING WHAT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES WILL ARISE.
 
This is straight from Wikipedia:
Blockquote Early Christian writers such as Justin Martyr, Eusebius, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Commodianus believed that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:1–4 were fallen angels who engaged in unnatural union with human women, resulting in the begetting of the Nephilim.[
I personally have never believed that the Nephilim were a product of the mating of “The sons of God” and “The daughters of men.” When I read the scripture in Genesis, I interpret it to say that the Nephilim were already upon the earth: “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them.”

And I’ve never thought that “The sons of God” referred to the angels. When I read the genealogy of Jesus in Luke, it ends with “…the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.” So here, Adam was the son of God because God personally created him. To my way of thinking, all men could be called the sons of God. Whereas woman was created from man, so all women could be called the daughters of men.

But when I heard these preachers saying that Noah was the only one who did not have corrupted DNA and that was why God destroyed the world with the flood and saved only Noah, and that Christ will come again because of the integration of man with machine, again corrupting man’s DNA. That, at least to me, is 🤔 🤣 :crazy_face: … but maybe someone else sees it differently.

Doesn’t the scripture say that God brought the flood because the intents of men’s hearts were only evil? And that Noah was righteous?
Yep…or is our DNA really corrupted with :alien: :alien: :alien: 🙃

(P.S. what is the proper way to do a blockquote so that “blockquote” doesn’t appear in the text? All this time, and I haven’t figured it out…)
 
One thing I had thought about many years ago was that, regardless of race, size, etc., there are only two types of people on the earth: one is the sons/daughters of God and the the other is sons/daughters of demons–or the descendants of those who were born from the fallen angels mating with some of the women of earth.
And that when Jesus told some of the Jewish people that they were sons of their father the Devil, that he meant it literally.

“Jesus said to them, “If God were your Father, you would love me … You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires.” (John 8:42,45)

And that those who will be saved are all of God’s children, whereas the sons/daughter of the devil are destined for the other place.

But people can come up with all sorts of wacky ideas.
 
Last edited:
That is fascinating about Tsar Nicholas. Could you provide a source? It seems weird for the Orthodox to canonize a devotee of Fatima.

Also:
Old Rasputin is a great beer!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top