This is straight from Wikipedia:
Blockquote Early Christian writers such as
Justin Martyr,
Eusebius,
Clement of Alexandria,
Origen, and
Commodianus believed that the “sons of God” in Genesis 6:1–4 were
fallen angels who engaged in unnatural union with human women, resulting in the
begetting of the
Nephilim.[
I personally have never believed that the Nephilim were a product of the mating of “The sons of God” and “The daughters of men.” When I read the scripture in Genesis, I interpret it to say that the Nephilim were already upon the earth: “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days,
and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them.”
And I’ve never thought that “The sons of God” referred to the angels. When I read the genealogy of Jesus in Luke, it ends with “…the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.” So here, Adam was the son of God because God personally created him. To my way of thinking, all men could be called the sons of God. Whereas woman was created from man, so all women could be called the daughters of men.
But when I heard these preachers saying that Noah was the only one who did not have corrupted DNA and that was why God destroyed the world with the flood and saved only Noah, and that Christ will come again because of the integration of man with machine, again corrupting man’s DNA. That, at least to me, is

:crazy_face: … but maybe someone else sees it differently.
Doesn’t the scripture say that God brought the flood because the intents of men’s hearts were only evil? And that Noah was righteous?
Yep…or is our DNA really corrupted with
(P.S. what is the proper way to do a blockquote so that “blockquote” doesn’t appear in the text? All this time, and I haven’t figured it out…)