U
undead_rat
Guest
The visions of Pope St. Pius X have been mentioned before. The 1909 vision specified that the Pope would leave Rome. The 1914 vision referred to a “successor of the same name” who would take refuge in some hiding place after leaving Vatican City. The easy interpretation here is that the second vision is simply a supplemental clarification to the first. But I have come to the conclusion that these two visions refer to different people: the first to the active Pope and the second to the “successor of the same name” who is not the the acting Pope.
That interpretation would mean that these visions can only apply to the present situation where we have a retired Pope living in Vatican City who additionally shares his first name with Giuseppe Sarto. Note that the second vision does not require its subject to have to walk. He could be carried if unable to do that.
That interpretation would mean that these visions can only apply to the present situation where we have a retired Pope living in Vatican City who additionally shares his first name with Giuseppe Sarto. Note that the second vision does not require its subject to have to walk. He could be carried if unable to do that.
Last edited: