C
Cruciferi
Guest
A No to what?
I have never said that they’re in Heaven. Nor do I believe that they’re dead.
I have never said that they’re in Heaven. Nor do I believe that they’re dead.
Perhaps you missed what I was replying to.I have never said that they’re in Heaven.
Seems clear to me that they expect these individuals to be in heaven.On the subject of Enoch and Elijah it does address the OP’s question. That being whether these two were ascended into heaven as the OP qouted
That’s why I brought up the Traditional thoughts on the matter. I believe it’s even mentioned in one of the notes in the Douay–Rheims Bible.Seems clear to me that they expect these individuals to be in heaven.
Are you saying that they are still here?Nor do I believe that they’re dead.
If not in heaven, than where?Seems clear to me that they expect these individuals to be in heaven.
Not dead does not imply a location.Are you saying that they are still here?
Not heaven.If not in heaven, than where?
Well, actually since the immediate judgment occurs at death, since the Resurrection of Christ, all the saints are in heaven meaning, from the Catechism:Catholic teaches that only 2 bodies are in Heaven, the Divine one Christ Jesus and Blessed Mother Mary. We do not know where Enoch and Elijah are, or are waiting. Some believe they will be the 2 witness in Revelations and are waiting in an ‘earthly paradise’ until their return.
1025 To live in heaven is “to be with Christ.” The elect live “in Christ,” 600 but they retain, or rather find, their true identity, their own name. 601
For life is to be with Christ; where Christ is, there is life, there is the kingdom. 602
Elijah the Prophet (Eliyahu HaNavi in Hebrew) did not die in the incident, but ascended to Heaven alive (see Talmud Baba Batra 121b, Mo’ed Katan 26a). He was one of very few to have perfected himself to such a degree that he was permitted to enter Heaven during his lifetime. (The other known example is Enoch, great-grandfather of Noah – see Genesis 5:4).) As a result, Elijah became part human and part angel. (See for example Talmud Brachot 4b that he flies more slowly than other angels – presumably because he is part physical (Maharsha there).) LinkAscend is not proper in this circumstance.
To ascend is to go by one’s own power.
They did not. God directly stepped in.
As to heaven…are we sure of where exactly they went? I didn’t think the Bible specified, and it doesn’t appear to be any type of tradition.
This does not sound like Catholic teaching at all.a result, Elijah became part human and part angel. (See for example Talmud Brachot 4b that he flies more slowly than other angels – presumably because he is part physical (Maharsha there).) Lin
That is the key, which word and in what context is it used in the Hebrew Bible.The word “ascent” was used…
That is a good question! Any more than asking the question of Abraham rejoiced at the thought of seeing my day; he saw it and was glad” (John 8:56).How did Moses and Elijah appear at the Transfiguration?
Angel’s being part human - part angel,
Angels assuming human form… not vice versa. The term angel is a messenger from God and yes, we (all) can fit the description as God can work through us to answer a prayer, to console, to bring help in need…look at all the great saints! Each saint helps us to propel our prayers to God through his son. We know that at some point we need the strength or encouragement so we call upon the saints and even when we pray to God we are encouraged to ask for a prayer partner.Angel’s being part human - part angel,
At least, not to take the form of an angel while presently on earth anyway. Physically speaking.Angels assuming human form… not vice versa.
But they’re still not human.Angels assuming human form
Angels are still distinctly different from Humans regardless of your insistence.The term angel is a messenger
This term has a distinct meaning in Biblical Hebrew. It does not mean ‘we can all , as humans beings messengers’The term angel is a messenger from God