Eucharist - Please help me understand

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2nd_Adam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Holy Days of Obligation
Sunday Mass Attendance a must
Reception of the Real Presence only in the state of Grace
Obedience to the Magisterium

And then there are the “optional” things which only we have, like Adoration, Lenten/Easter requirements etc. Other faith communities may have “borrowed” some of these, but that is the extent of their commitment.

I think that being a committed Catholic (East or West) is the hardest - and most rewarding - thing to do.

Yes I pray for unity… please come home.

.
I have often pondered which is more difficult, to do the right things because you are required by authority to do so, or doing the right things because you require it of yourself. Alas, the grass somethimes seems greener over there, as I sometimes wish Lutheranism required confession, etc.

Good chatting with you,
Jon
 
For 1570 years there was only the Catholic Church declaring what “This is my body” meant.
You don’t actually mean that, since you say later that these interpretations had been proliferating for 60 years.

And of course any historian will tell you that the Catholic Church did not have a monolithic view of the Real Presence. Read Gary Macy. (I’m sure you’ll say he’s a liberal heretic. Well, so be it.)

Edwin
 
You don’t actually mean that, since you say later that these interpretations had been proliferating for 60 years.

And of course any historian will tell you that the Catholic Church did not have a monolithic view of the Real Presence. Read Gary Macy. (I’m sure you’ll say he’s a liberal heretic. Well, so be it.)

Edwin
yeah, shoulda said 1500 years… makes a BIG difference.

And yes the Catholic Church has a long a strong history of refuting heresies and attacks on the only Church founded by Jesus Himself. … those 60, and any you might care to reference.

.
 
2nd Adam;5701831:
under the Old Covenant. The New Covenant replaces and fulfills the Old.

.
Are saying Abraham was saved differently than those in the NT Church. If so, why does Paul use Abraham (Rom 4) and Galatians to expound the gospel? We know Job said that his redeemer lived. Here’s a good verse for you to wrestle with:

Galatians 3:8

And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, “In you shall all the nations be blessed.”
 
Eucharist - Please help me understand

What is frustrating to me about your presence in this forum, Adam,is that you asked the

people here to help you understand our belief in the Eucharist. They did that,and very well I must say.
I wait for you to tell us, “Fair enough,but sorry I don’t buy it”,and off you go on your way.

Instead you stick around telling us how wrong we are and that we do not preach Christ’s

Gospel.

I don’t think you know as much about the way Catholics practice the Gospel, as you say you do.

My frustration is that you are not accepting what we are telling you we believe.Instead you have proceeded to tell us what you think we should believe.

Can anyone blame me for becoming short and impatient with you?:shrug:Carlan-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m sorry if I offended you, it was not my intention to upset you. I never wrote thqt you do not preach Christ’s gospel. You guys have been very kind and respectful… so thanks again. I hope when you participate on Protestants Forum sites, that they are nice to you… just like how you guys have been to me. I truly believe in a universal church consisting of Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox, Anglicans, etc. Therefore, please treat me as a seperated brethern who knows in part. I enjoy my conversation with my Catholic spererated bretherns and sisters.
 
You don’t actually mean that, since you say later that these interpretations had been proliferating for 60 years.

And of course any historian will tell you that the Catholic Church did not have a monolithic view of the Real Presence. Read Gary Macy. (I’m sure you’ll say he’s a liberal heretic. Well, so be it.)

Edwin
I’m think this thread is getting too emotional for me. I’ll leave it with the post from Edwin as my final thoughts on the matter.
 
To: 2nd. Adam

My dear friend 2nd. Adam

As I ponder your past post on this thread it has suddenly become clear to me that the issue at hand is not a lack of understanding, rather it lies in a very deficient Faith. A lack of belief so severe that it leads to a confused mind.

Faith too weak to be able to understand that God is all Powerful, that God loves us with an incomprehensible Love. That God is Perfect Humility, and will go to unfathomable length’s to aid in the salvation of souls all stem from a lack of Faith not in God per sae, rather in Who and What God Truly are and must be.

I base this on what I call my Fourth Grade Comprehension test. Take a class of Fourth Graders, and read to them John 6: 52-68, Mt. 26: 26-28, Mk. 14: 22-24, Lk. 22: 19-21, and 1 Cor. 11: 23-28. And then simply ask them what they heard. Will they comprehend it? Maybe, maybe not, but they will tell you what was read.

It is an evident lack of faith in Gods Greatness, Gods Love for us and Gods desire that all men are saved.

Now this previous statement is big part of the problem. The Bible clearly tells that Salvation is not a done deal, and that lack of understanding, too comes from not really knowing anything [or at least very little] about The Divine Nature of God. This topic is seldom taught in the realm of Protestant Theology. Most preachers will speak of God’s Attributes, but I don’t ever recall hearing one speak of Gods Divine Nature.

The root of the issue seems to lie in the lack of comprehension that God must be, has to be, and therefore is a Just and Fair God. Predestination, OSAS is a failed Theology that over looks these facts. We are created by God, for the very precise purpose of PROVING our love for Him. [Isaiah 43: 7, 21 Heb.13:15 and Rom. 14:11]. That is the fully precise purpose for being “made in His image” [Gen. 1: 26-17] with some similar attributes [Gods are Perfect, ours are very imperfect] “namely a mind, intellect and freewill”, all of which are “Spiritual Things” like God Himself. To deny the right use of these God given attributes is a most serious error, and that is exactly what OSAS and Predestination do. They do not permit humanity to fulfill the precise reason we were created and they fail to comprehend that God, being God, must be “fair.”

And what is “Fair” about some persons being predestined before birth, to either heaven or hell. Or what’s “Fair” about OSAS, which too denies the purpose of God giving ONLY HUMANITY, a mind, intellect and freewill. Gifts this special and unique must have a specific reason.

Luke 10:16 “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.”

Mark 3: 13 “And he went up on the mountain, and called to him those whom he desired; and they came to him. 14 And he appointed twelve, to be with him, and to be sent out to preach and have authority to cast out demons: Simon whom he surnamed Peter; James the son of Zebedee and John the brother of James, whom he surnamed Bo-anerges, that is, sons of thunder; Andrew, and Philip, and Bartholomew, and Matthew, and Thomas, and James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus, and Simon the Cananaean, and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him.”

Titus 2: 15 “Declare these things; exhort and reprove with all authority. Let no one disregard you. “

Eph. 2:19 “So then you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure is joined together and grows into a holy temple in the Lord; [SINGULAR] in whom you also are built into it for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.”

Mt. 28: 18 “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, to the close of the age.”

Mt. 18: 15 "If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault, between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, that every word may be confirmed by the evidence of two or three witnesses. If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; [SINGULAR] and if he refuses to listen even to the church, [SINGULAR] let him be to you as a Gentile and a tax collector. Truly, I say to you, whatever you [SINGULAR] bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”

1 Tim. 3:15 “if I am delayed, you may know how one ought to behave in the household of God, which is the church of the living God, [singular] the pillar [singular] and bulwark of the truth. [singular] Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion:”

Eph. 2:19 19 So then you are no longer strangers and sojourners, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, in whom the whole structure is joined together and grows into a holy temple in the Lord; [SINGULAR] in whom you also are built into it for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.

1Tim. 6: “Teach and urge these duties. 3 If any one teaches otherwise and does not agree with the sound words of our Lord Jesus Christ and the teaching which accords with godliness, he is puffed up with conceit, he knows nothing; he has a morbid craving for controversy and for disputes about words, which produce envy, dissension, slander, base suspicions, and wrangling among men who are depraved in mind and bereft of the truth, imagining that godliness is a means of gain. There is great gain in godliness with contentment; for we brought nothing into the world, and * we cannot take anything out of the world;”
 
I have often pondered which is more difficult, to do the right things because you are required by authority to do so, or doing the right things because you require it of yourself. Alas, the grass somethimes seems greener over there, as I sometimes wish Lutheranism required confession, etc.

Good chatting with you,
Jon
I think to do the right thing because we are required by rightful authority even if we don’t fully understand it, requires humility. Doing the right thing because we require it ourselves, requires discipline.
 
I think to do the right thing because we are required by rightful authority even if we don’t fully understand it, requires humility. Doing the right thing because we require it ourselves, requires discipline.
AMEN AND AMEN:D:thumbsup:Carlan
 
Originally Posted by ferdie
I think to do the right thing because we are required by rightful authority even if we don’t fully understand it, requires humility. Doing the right thing because we require it ourselves, requires discipline.
And being an Informed, fully practicing Catholic requires humility, courage, patience, Love, fortitude, and discipline and knowledge.
 
I’m sorry if I offended you, it was not my intention to upset you. I never wrote thqt you do not preach Christ’s gospel. You guys have been very kind and respectful… so thanks again. I hope when you participate on Protestants Forum sites, that they are nice to you… just like how you guys have been to me. I truly believe in a universal church consisting of Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox, Anglicans, etc. Therefore, please treat me as a seperated brethern who knows in part. I enjoy my conversation with my Catholic spererated bretherns and sisters.
Thank you Adam and God bless you in your search for the whole Truth!:love:👍 Carlan

1
 
And being an Informed, fully practicing Catholic requires humility, courage, patience, Love, fortitude, and discipline and knowledge.
Ahhh…the gifts of the Holy Spirit, may God grant us the grace to receive them and practice them, specially in this forum.🙂
  1. wisdom
  2. knowledge
  3. understanding
  4. counsel
  5. fortitude
  6. piety and
  7. fear of the Lord
 
Here is another sincere question that I have. In the upper room when Jesus instituted the Eucharist, did Jesus convert the bread and wine into His acutual flesh and literal blood for the 12 disciples to partake. How effectual was the Eucharist for Judas? Or did Judas actually partake in the elements?
Some say that when Judas partook of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ while not in a state of grace, that was the moment when he became possessed by the Devil. They say that it was his unworthy reception of Holy Communion that was the means by which the Devil overtook him and caused him to betray Christ.
 
Some say that when Judas partook of the flesh and blood of Jesus Christ while not in a state of grace, that was the moment when he became possessed by the Devil. They say that it was his unworthy reception of Holy Communion that was the means by which the Devil overtook him and caused him to betray Christ.
That brings us to another point. I only post these things so we can all look deeper into the grace that we now stand… to the praise of His glorious grace. In my understanding, all 12 disciples are equally unworthy to receive the eternal blessings of God. I think Judas sinned just like Peter. Even the OT saints had a wretched life of sin, but were forgiven. I think Peter could not even take credit for revealing that Jesus was the Christ since God the Father revealed that truth to him. Any thoughts?
 
So, I guess my question would be, “who *wouldn’t *defend what they believe to be the Truth revealed by God-- the source of eternal life-- with ‘vigor’?” (Not to be confused with “uncharitable” methods. I am not in favor of being uncharitable.)

It’s a *strange religion *that doesn’t feel the need to proclaim and defend the Truth. It seems that in many Protestant circles/denominations/non-denominations there is this idea that “your truth” and “my truth” are OK. I’m OK, you’re OK. Truth is maleable, it’s subjective, it’s based on experience. We can all have our own mutually exclusive versions of the Truth. That’s just **bizarre **to me.

Honestly, Geore Orwell wrote about this. Doublethink.
I agree, but disagree at the same time,
God revealed the truth through the new testament. Catholics have been following this truth for over 2000 years!! This is not my “opinion” is a fact, there was a manuscript recovered that was written in 70 a.d.! On this manuscript, it had the process of the Mass, INCLUDING THE EUCHARIST, all of it is the SAME now as 2000 years ago, nothing subtracted.

So since the Roman Catholic bible (or the directors cut as i like to call it) is part of the full truth (the other part is reveled though sacred scripture), what happens when you rip out a passage that you don’t agree with? You create your own god, your own “truth” that you follow.

Oh yeah, by the way, the Eucharist isn’t just the truth, it is God himself transformed into bread and wine for the un-bloody sacrifice of the mass.

Hope this clears things up, and sorry if it was what you were saying. 😊 🙂
 
all 12 disciples are equally unworthy to receive the eternal blessings of God. I think Judas sinned just like Peter. Even the OT saints had a wretched life of sin, but were forgiven. I think Peter could not even take credit for revealing that Jesus was the Christ since God the Father revealed that truth to him. Any thoughts?
Yeah, thats a good thought, but here is what I think.
Judas could have easily been forgiven by Jesus, had he not gone and hung himself (which is a mortal sin, so no doubts of where he is now, not that its any of my business ;)). And Peter DID sin, lots, just like almost all humans, with the exemption of the blessed mother. And yes, TONS of saints have overcome sin to enter into heaven, Saint Augustine as an example. So I’m not getting your point, thats what makes them so great. Also, I can’t think of anytime Peter “took credit” for anything Jesus had revealed. And God the Father did not reveal that to him, when he first started following Jesus, he thought he was a prophet, until’ Jesus told him other wise. I don;t get your point there either, could you explain?
 
Yeah, thats a good thought, but here is what I think.
Judas could have easily been forgiven by Jesus, had he not gone and hung himself (which is a mortal sin, so no doubts of where he is now, not that its any of my business ;)). And Peter DID sin, lots, just like almost all humans, with the exemption of the blessed mother. And yes, TONS of saints have overcome sin to enter into heaven, Saint Augustine as an example. So I’m not getting your point, thats what makes them so great. Also, I can’t think of anytime Peter “took credit” for anything Jesus had revealed. And God the Father did not reveal that to him, when he first started following Jesus, he thought he was a prophet, until’ Jesus told him other wise. I don;t get your point there either, could you explain?
I see that spiritual truth is concealed (Jesus spoke in parables for intentional concealment) until God reveals truth to us (believers). But God reveals spiritual truth which leads to eternal life to certain vessels that are no more worthy than those who do not have God’s favor of divine revealed revelation. The Apostle Paul is another example, leading the charge to kill Christians. God saves sinners in-spite of our sinfulness against him. David, Solomon were sinful. I think Jacob was as sinful as Esau.
 
I think to do the right thing because we are required by rightful authority even if we don’t fully understand it, requires humility. Doing the right thing because we require it ourselves, requires discipline.
I agree. And neither is necessarily easy.
Jon
 
I believe the Catholic view of the Eucharist makes it unique, validating it to be the One True Church which makes it necessary to be a member of the Catholic Church. However, the Orthodox Churches are similar in their ability to convert the elements to actual flesh and blood, correct?
The Western and Eastern (orthodox) Catholic Church are one in the body of Jesus Christ for these have Apostolic Succession from the Apostles themselves and the True Presence of the body, blood of Jesus Christ…

What you are misinformed about is that these two are not seperated in the body of Jesus Christ. Where uninformed Protestants makes the mistake of thinking these two are distinct Church’s they are not. True there are a few Orthodox Eastern Rites that in schism with the Pope’s authority, not with the body of Jesus Christ.

These Eastern Rites in schism is not the same as the Western Protestants who have severed their communion from the True presence and or the full communion of the Body of Jesus Christ. There is a difference between the Eastern schism of authority and the Western Protestant break from Holy Communion and succession from the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

What may surprise you is that there are Orthodox Eastern Catholic Rites that are in full communion with the Pope. So painting the Orthodox Eastern Catholic Church with a broad brush of being a seperate Church from the Western Catholic Church reveals your misinformed about the True Presence of Jesus Christ which unites all the brethern as one body never 2.

You want proof? ask any Eastern Orthodox if they believe in the True (Eucharist) Presence of Jesus Christ in the Mass? There is no division here, where faith matters.

Just for your information
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top