A lot has happened since that vote three years ago.
It is tiresome, even for me, to recount all the complicated intricacies, so I’ll spare you the boredom.
But the salient fact of the matter is that Brexit has broke the British political system and resulted in an interminable constitutional crisis that the government, and parliament itself, has proved incapable of overcoming.
What’s the point in referring back to the vote as this almost “holy grail” if what was decided can’t actually be achieved as promised?
The proof is in the pudding and there is no “there” there with the Brexit Leavers thought they’d get.
I’m more interested in how Britain moves on and gets out of this crisis. My preference, and that of many other Brits, is for a second referendum with a two-step process (Leave/Remain first again, followed by actual Brexit options that are deliverable, even if less than ideal, next if Leave wins again that we’d have to vote on) and then a general election to give a new government the chance to try and deliver.
And please, let’s not compare Brexit with Trump or Hilary Clinton. Brexit was a far more serious and substantial decision for Britain, with ramifications for generations if not centuries to come, than the US electing a president for a four year-term.
The only event comparable in scale to Brexit (although it hasn’t, thankfully, got to the point of bullets) in your national history, would be the American Civil War - not the 2016 election.