V
Vouthon
Guest
telegraph.co.uk/tv/2016/05/14/eurovision-2016-could-russia-win—joe-and-jake-uk/
**Eurovision 2016: Ukraine win over rivals Russia and Australia in tension-filled climax - and four other things we learned
Ukraine win the day
Ukraine have won Eurovision with a political, heartfelt and serious song about something with intense personal meaning to the singer, Jamala. It’s a song about Stalin’s forced deportation of Crimean Tatars, including members of Jamala’s own family, in 1944.
In the run-up to the contest, Russia complained that Ukraine shouldn’t be allowed to sing this particular song, as Eurovision generally bans overtly political songs, not least when they have contemporary resonances like this.**
But Jamala was eventually cleared to compete, and in the end she ended up going head-to-head with pre-contest favourite Russia’s Sergey Lazarev for the title. Her win proves that emotional and high-quality music can triumph at Eurovision, and the contest will always have a political element, no matter how much the organisers try to pretend it’s about music above all else…
After sending two storming performances in two years, Australia have proved that they take Eurovision seriously. If Dami Im had won, nobody would have begrudged her the title: she sang a brilliant song with real panache.
And nothing about Eurovision has ever really made any sense, so having Australia being a part of things doesn’t even feel that weird. Not with all of the other madness that’s always part and parcel of Eurovision every year, anyway.