Evangelism question

  • Thread starter Thread starter brosam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, this place is a great place to Evangelize. I would reply to him and answer any questions he may have. Online. Then direct him to more in depth resources if he were interested.

Where are you going with this?
I’m looking at this, and comparing it to your initial reply in post #99:
"I know what I would do!! I would set up a website that contains tracts, documents, and links to sources that support the Catholic Church’s teachings on the Truth of the Gospels. I would then introduce a forum, where all are welcome to discuss, argue, dispute, affirm ideas, Theology, Doctrine, Scripture. I would open the forum to the whole world: people of all faiths and non faiths. This would foster thoughtful and respectful dialogue and understanding.

Then I would financially support the website and the forum.

And last, but most importantly, pray for it."

So, how might be one way you would reply to him? What would be your “in a nutshell explanation”, given that you would reply, answer questions, and then direct him to resources as appropriate?

God bless,

Michael
 
Brosam,

I’m not sure why you came to this forum. I do know that you are judging people that you don’t know. I believe that this is not acceptable in the scripture. “Judge not lest ye be judged”.

I do know this… I converted to the Catholic faith at Easter 2007. I have a real presence of God in my life now! I know that all humans are sinners. Whether that sin be “murder and stuff” or simply a hate or disgust in one’s heart for those of another Christian path. Yes you are a sinner, just as I am. I also know that I witness to people on a daily basis. Everyone that I meet…everyone that I speak with. Six people joined the Catholic church because of my witnessing to them.

They saw that I was changed, they listened to what I had to say. I was able to finally explain all the unexplained questions I had ever had about God, Jesus, The Holy Spirit, etc…

Yes the Church is Jesus!!! The Church is the body… Why do you not know this? And Yes, it really is one heavy cross.

I am at peace in my relationship with the Lord! I attend RCIA classes so that I may more fully understand the Catholic faith. I currently have three more people attending classes.

My 93 year old grandmother (who thought the Catholic church was of the devil) was able to turn her heart to a better understanding of this faith just by listening. Why can’t you.

The first Christian Chruch was the Catholic Church. They have not changed their teaching… The other Christian churches broke away one-by-one as they found they could not follow the truth.

Where did you get this bible you teach from??? The Catholic Church.

Do you think that Jesus owned a bible? NO
Do you think that the Apostles owned a bible? NO
Do you think that the earliest churches owned bibles? NO

The Catholic church collected the writings and formed a book with them. The church that presented them is the only one that truly understands them.

We do not take scripture out of context. I pray for you to come to a better understanding of our Faith.

Why all the worry about being “saved”. Jesus died for all of us… it is up to us whether or not we want to accept the salvation he has offered. We must follow his path. We will stumble for we are only human. We must then go to confession, repent, ask for forgiveness, and receive him in communion.

In order to be Catholic, one must accept that Jesus is God in human form. He came to this earth by the power of the Holy Spirit, was born to the Virgin Mary, and lived the life of a human person. He suffered and died for us so that we may be able to live forever.

WE ARE ALL SINNERS, WHO IN CHRIST ARE STRIVING TO SIN NO MORE. WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO LIVE AS HE LIVED. WE ARE ATTEMPTING TO WITNESS TO OUR BROTHERS AND SISTERS THAT THEY MAY KNOW HIM.
Nicely put . Your answer was truely inspirational. You see, our friend does not realize that we also have Sacred Tradition, as an other source ot teaching the Faith, as the Apostles said on several occasions not all the things that Christ taught was recorded in written form, that is another reason why the Catholic Church claims to have the full deposit of Faith.
God bless, Theo…👍
 
Going through the evangelism forum, I’m struck by the difference between the Roman Catholic idea of evangelism and the Christian teaching of evangelism.

In nearly every thread, the topic is how to recruit people to Roman Catholicism, but nothing about the Gospel, which is to be the centerpiece of evangelism.

I’ve got a challenge for you.

Let’s say that I’m an unsaved sinner and you’re going to share the Gospel with me. How would you do it?
First of all, I would ask the Holy Spirit for guidance and for assistance.

Then I would humbly acknowledge that I need wisdom from religious experts just as I would need experts if you asked me a medical or scientific question. I would not presume that I alone have enough knowledge, grace and inspiration to convey the Truth of the Gospel to you all by myself.

I would point out to you that Jesus did not write down the Gospel in a book, but left us a living Church to channel not only knowlege but also sacramental graces to us, to help us and to strengthen us in this life. I would also point out to you that the Gospel itself which we all love, respect and cherish so much was given to us by the living Church that Jesus left behind. The Bible we read now was not published during Jesus’ lifetime. In the Bible, Jesus did not command the apostles “Go now and write all of this down.” It is the Church that Christ founded that has given us the Bible.

With this preamble, hoping that you percieve that Jesus left us things in addition to the written Word-- a living, loving human Church to guide us-- I would share some of my best Catholic resources with you, starting with:

Amazing online resources – homilies, articles and activities from some of the most inspired Faithful priests and Bishops you have ever heard –
Diocese of Madison Online Audio and Video:
madisondiocese.org/
Bishop Speaks:
madisoncatholicherald.org…nt/bishop.html
Isthmus Catholic homilies:
isthmuscatholic.org/custo…281&active=281
St.Paul University Catholic Center Homilies:
stpaulscc.org/ – click “AUDIO”
Rosary for the Bishop:
oremusmusic.net/rosary/

Finally, after you have had an opportunity to process some of the Church’s wealth of wisdom and knowledge, I would pray that you have the grace and the faith to recognize the greatest gift of all that Jesus left for us — his own Real Presence in the Eucharist, which each of us is free to visit, pray before, consult personally, and receive in Holy Communion at any Catholic Church when we have been prepared to realize the wealth that was left to us by Christ.

Bottom line— for all of us Christians who can appreciate the spiritual wealth that the Bible contains, there’s more where that came from – from the Catholic Church.

God bless all of us in our search for the TRUTH !

.
 
1 Peter 3:15 is just a reminder of how we are to respond when others ask about what we believe. It applies as a reminder to me, as much as anyone else. Michael

I agree with you, but I don’t think Brosam was here to find out what we believe. He was here to insult our faith and practice, and to “educate” us. He started out by finding fault that we don’t evangelize “biblically”. He was role playing in an effort to teach us how to do evangelism the way he believes is “biblical”.
brosam;2747323:
Remember, in this premise, I’m role playing the part of the unsaved lost sinner.

When I was a new Christian, although I wasn’t Roman Catholic, my ideas of evangelism were very similar to yours before I learned to share the Gospel and each of the responses I’m giving you are based on real life responses I got when I did what you’re doing now.

So please don’t think I’m picking on you. You guys say you’re Christians and I’m taking your word for that. What I’m trying to do, maybe in a bit of a roundabout way, is, one Christian to another, help you to hone your evangelism skills.
He found our “skills” to be deficient and inappropriate, and was motivated to confront and correct us.
 
I agree with you, but I don’t think Brosam was here to find out what we believe. He was here to insult our faith and practice, and to “educate” us. He started out by finding fault that we don’t evangelize “biblically”. He was role playing in an effort to teach us how to do evangelism the way he believes is “biblical”.

He found our “skills” to be deficient and inappropriate, and was motivated to confront and correct us.
The point, however, is that it is precisely those type of critics with whom we are called most to exercise patience and charity. We are never ‘excused’ to dismiss such lost and wayward spirits because they are close-minded and stubborn. Evangelism is intended first and foremost for the lost and confused, not the like-minded.

I firmly believe God sends the stubborn by my way at least once a quarter to test me. 😛 I’m getting better at developing patience due to the exercise. Charity took a while longer, it was so easy at first to just snip back tit-for-tat exchanges with like snarkiness, but the Spirit helped me realize my playing that game did a disservice to Our Lord’s message.
 
I agree with you, but I don’t think Brosam was here to find out what we believe. He was here to insult our faith and practice, and to “educate” us. He started out by finding fault that we don’t evangelize “biblically”. He was role playing in an effort to teach us how to do evangelism the way he believes is “biblical”.

He found our “skills” to be deficient and inappropriate, and was motivated to confront and correct us.
Hello Guanophore,
Code:
  Thank you for your reply. I haven't read a lot of his posts, so do not have a well formed or strong opinion of whether he was here more to insult us, or to educate, or to challenge us, or a combination to varying degrees. What I have read is that he directly states what he disagrees with, and then challenges us to respond or by example prove him wrong. The OP in this thread seemed, in my opinion, not so much an insult, as a challenge to prove him wrong. Also, the responses on our part often seemed more defensive, and supportive of what he was trying to support.
Listening to mother Anglelica yesterday on EWTN, she mentioned that we can learn much from our seperated brothers and sisters in Christ. Her specific example was the sincere love of God that she witnessed in the Baptist works who were involved in the construction/building of a new Catholic Church. And Scott Hahn has often commented that there is much that is done well by Protestants what we can learn from their example. He would probably agree what we could learn from our seperated brothers and sisters in evangelizing Biblically. "He started out by finding fault that we don’t evangelize “biblically”. Scott would probably agree that we don’t do this as well as we should, and is one area where we can learn from their example. After all, the Scripture is Catholic.
Code:
  I was challenged to share my faith, and learned by example how to share my faith from seperated brothers and sisters in Christ. Now, when I go on mission trips with them, often they will listen to what the Catholic Church truly teaches because I address them with what they value: Scripture. Evangelizing with Scripture is consistent with Scripture. Only if we don't prepare and be ready to do so, are we uncomfortable with it. I think this is one of the reasons Scott Hahn's mission is to promote Biblical literacy among Catholics.
God bless,

Michael
 
The point, however, is that it is precisely those type of critics with whom we are called most to exercise patience and charity. We are never ‘excused’ to dismiss such lost and wayward spirits because they are close-minded and stubborn. Evangelism is intended first and foremost for the lost and confused, not the like-minded.

I firmly believe God sends the stubborn by my way at least once a quarter to test me. 😛 I’m getting better at developing patience due to the exercise. Charity took a while longer, it was so easy at first to just snip back tit-for-tat exchanges with like snarkiness, but the Spirit helped me realize my playing that game did a disservice to Our Lord’s message.
Very insightful, thank you for your post.

God bless,

Michael
 
First of all, I would ask the Holy Spirit for guidance and for assistance.

Then I would humbly acknowledge that I need wisdom from religious experts just as I would need experts if you asked me a medical or scientific question. I would not presume that I alone have enough knowledge, grace and inspiration to convey the Truth of the Gospel to you all by myself.

I would point out to you that Jesus did not write down the Gospel in a book, but left us a living Church to channel not only knowlege but also sacramental graces to us, to help us and to strengthen us in this life. I would also point out to you that the Gospel itself which we all love, respect and cherish so much was given to us by the living Church that Jesus left behind. The Bible we read now was not published during Jesus’ lifetime. In the Bible, Jesus did not command the apostles “Go now and write all of this down.” It is the Church that Christ founded that has given us the Bible.

With this preamble, hoping that you percieve that Jesus left us things in addition to the written Word-- a living, loving human Church to guide us-- I would share some of my best Catholic resources with you, starting with:

Amazing online resources – homilies, articles and activities from some of the most inspired Faithful priests and Bishops you have ever heard –
Diocese of Madison Online Audio and Video:
madisondiocese.org/
Bishop Speaks:
madisoncatholicherald.org…nt/bishop.html
Isthmus Catholic homilies:
isthmuscatholic.org/custo…281&active=281
St.Paul University Catholic Center Homilies:
stpaulscc.org/ – click “AUDIO”
Rosary for the Bishop:
oremusmusic.net/rosary/

Finally, after you have had an opportunity to process some of the Church’s wealth of wisdom and knowledge, I would pray that you have the grace and the faith to recognize the greatest gift of all that Jesus left for us — his own Real Presence in the Eucharist, which each of us is free to visit, pray before, consult personally, and receive in Holy Communion at any Catholic Church when we have been prepared to realize the wealth that was left to us by Christ.

Bottom line— for all of us Christians who can appreciate the spiritual wealth that the Bible contains, there’s more where that came from – from the Catholic Church.

God bless all of us in our search for the TRUTH !

.
Acknowledging that none of us understands the fullness of the Truth, and that there are many valuable resources, both written, on the web, and fellow Catholics, once you prayerfully asked the Holy Spirit for guidance and assistance, what would be your “in a nutshell” words to someone asking you to explain why you are Catholic? What is the “nuts and bolts” in your own words?

God bless,

Michael
 
…once you prayerfully asked the Holy Spirit for guidance and assistance, what would be your “in a nutshell” words to someone asking you to explain why you are Catholic? What is the “nuts and bolts” in your own words?

God bless,

Michael
You do realize, don’t you, that there is no correct answer for such a question?

Each opportunity for evangelization calls for a unique and personal approach. Since at all times we are but instruments of the Spirit and your question begins with having first “prayerfully asked the Holy Spirit for guidance and assistance”, none of us can accurately predict what the Spirit will guide us to do at any given point - will he move us to respond in action, word or silence?

As for the “nuts and bolts” response, there is no response to “Why I am Catholic” that works for all people.

I suppose if there were one response it would/should be “By the grace of God.” but that doesn’t go into the nuts and bolts of anything, does it?

Nuts and bolts would delve into the Eucharist and Reconciliation and the Liturgy and the Saints and so on which takes anyone out of the realm of a ‘brief response’.
 
Hello Guanophore,
Code:
  Thank you for your reply. I haven't read a lot of his posts, so do not have a well formed or strong opinion of whether he was here more to insult us, or to educate, or to challenge us, or a combination to varying degrees.
Christ’s peace, Michael. Unfortunately, Brosam came here and placed the Catholic church in opposition to Christianity. This was probably done with good intentions, but which road is so paved? He has beeen greatly mislead in faith, as were the Saducees. I pray for him.

Christ’s peace be with you.
 
Acknowledging that none of us understands the fullness of the Truth, and that there are many valuable resources, both written, on the web, and fellow Catholics, once you prayerfully asked the Holy Spirit for guidance and assistance, what would be your “in a nutshell” words to someone asking you to explain why you are Catholic? What is the “nuts and bolts” in your own words?

God bless,

Michael
I am a Catholic because I know that the Catholic Church was established by the Word and is the guardian of the Truth. Once I figured that out, it was a no-brainer. What other choices are there?
Regarding explaining to someone who does not understand that— no imposing body of knowldge can be transferred instantly to someone who has not spent time on it. I spent a lot of time in study and in prayer.
When in doubt, throw the question at God and see where He leads you. 😃

God bless!

.
 
You do realize, don’t you, that there is no correct answer for such a question?
As stated, “…once you prayerfully asked the Holy Spirit for guidance and assistance, what would be your “in a nutshell” words to someone asking you to explain why you are Catholic? What is the “nuts and bolts” in your own words?”

So yes, I realize that God with the Holy Spirit will lead in various ways, and the “nuts and bolts” can be expressed in different ways. HOWEVER, is it incorrect not to answer in one’s own words?
I suppose if there were one response it would/should be “By the grace of God.” but that doesn’t go into the nuts and bolts of anything, does it?
I agree, “By the grace of God” is the introduction to the nuts and bolts, not the completed sentence/sentences that speak of the nuts and bolts. Protestants can correctly start the same way… are their nuts and bolts different than ours?
Nuts and bolts would delve into the Eucharist and Reconciliation and the Liturgy and the Saints and so on which takes anyone out of the realm of a ‘brief response’.
You are correct, getting into Liturgy and the Saints takes one out of the realm of a “brief response”, and might be argued to be out of the realm of the “nuts and bolts” Reconciliation can be seen as part of the “nuts and bolts”, as Jesus proclaimed “repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand”. Yet using the term reconciliation might not be at the level to start with, being more of a Catholic terminology, than a nonCatholic terminology. The Eucharist also pertains, yet the term is more a Catholic term and might be viewed as beyond the starting level. Mentionin Jesus dying for our sins on the cross might be more to the “nuts and bolts”. Jn 12:32 “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.”

God bless,

Michael
 
I am a Catholic because I know that the Catholic Church was established by the Word and is the guardian of the Truth. Once I figured that out, it was a no-brainer. What other choices are there?
Regarding explaining to someone who does not understand that— no imposing body of knowldge can be transferred instantly to someone who has not spent time on it. I spent a lot of time in study and in prayer.
When in doubt, throw the question at God and see where He leads you. 😃

God bless!

.
A Jewish believer could just as well say "I am a Jew because I know that Israel was established by God, as we read in Exodus 18:1 “Now Jethro, the priest of Midian, Moses’ father-in-law, heard of all that God had done for Moses and for Israel His people, how the LORD had brought Israel out of Egypt.” So Israel was established by the Word and is the guardian of the Truth. Once I figured that out, it was a no-brainer. What other choices are there?

In regards to “Regarding explaining to someone who does not understand that— no imposing body of knowldge can be transferred instantly to someone who has not spent time on it. I spent a lot of time in study and in prayer.
When in doubt, throw the question at God and see where He leads you.”
Code:
   We know that God gave us the Bible to lead us and instruct us. As far as explaining to someone who does not understand, we read: 1 Peter 3:15 "but sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence;"
God bless,

Michael
 
Yes, with gentleness and with reverence!

I believe that in terms of “nuts and bolts” it is relatively simple –

Challenge God with your question, and I believe that He does lead a person to the right place (the Church).
Don’t assume that you will personally find the answer, or that you will personally convince someone who is searching for the Truth, but politely request and even demand that God leads you or that person to the Truth.

God is interactive and user friendly, and this is one of the aspects of God that I had lost touch with for a while.
Too much empahcis on OUR finding the answer intellectually and not addressing God to lead us to the answer is typical not only of me but of our entire culture.

Having intellectual duels with biblical quotations may not always be the best way to go.

It is also important to remember that what is convincing to one person may not be the same thing that another person finds convincing. It’s individualized, like we are. Evangelization needs to be customized and there is no formula. Only God knows each of the hairs on each of our heads.

So in terms of simple nuts and bolts, I tell people who are interested enough to ask – throw the question at God and see where He leads you. I tell them that I am sure that God will lead them to the Catholic Church. I have enough confidence in God, in the correctness of my answer (the Catholic Church) and in the earnestness of the person asking, that I truly believe that they will end up in the right place. Then I am willing to share my prayers and my resources if the person has any questions about my Church.
IT WORKS.

God bless!

P.S. In a culture that is very scientific and fact-oriented, sometimes you can get the attention of people with facts and statistics such as:
When looking for the true Christian Church, look for the fruits–
2000 year history
1 billion members
Universal- every continent and every nation on earth
Direct line from Christ through Peter unbroken
Centralized, organized, responsible for the development of Christendom in Europe
Who else has that resume?
How do you explain John Paul the Great’s funeral drawing 4 million people to Rome, the largest gathering in human history?
 
Yes, with gentleness and with reverence!

I believe that in terms of “nuts and bolts” it is relatively simple –

Challenge God with your question, and I believe that He does lead a person to the right place (the Church).
Don’t assume that you will personally find the answer, or that you will personally convince someone who is searching for the Truth, but politely request and even demand that God leads you or that person to the Truth.

God is interactive and user friendly, and this is one of the aspects of God that I had lost touch with for a while.
Too much empahcis on OUR finding the answer intellectually and not addressing God to lead us to the answer is typical not only of me but of our entire culture.

Having intellectual duels with biblical quotations may not always be the best way to go.

It is also important to remember that what is convincing to one person may not be the same thing that another person finds convincing. It’s individualized, like we are. Evangelization needs to be customized and there is no formula. Only God knows each of the hairs on each of our heads.

So in terms of simple nuts and bolts, I tell people who are interested enough to ask – throw the question at God and see where He leads you. I tell them that I am sure that God will lead them to the Catholic Church. I have enough confidence in God, in the correctness of my answer (the Catholic Church) and in the earnestness of the person asking, that I truly believe that they will end up in the right place. Then I am willing to share my prayers and my resources if the person has any questions about my Church.
IT WORKS.

God bless!

P.S. In a culture that is very scientific and fact-oriented, sometimes you can get the attention of people with facts and statistics such as:
When looking for the true Christian Church, look for the fruits–
2000 year history
1 billion members
Universal- every continent and every nation on earth
Direct line from Christ through Peter unbroken
Centralized, organized, responsible for the development of Christendom in Europe
Who else has that resume?
How do you explain John Paul the Great’s funeral drawing 4 million people to Rome, the largest gathering in human history?
I read this and thought “score one for the OP”.
Having intellectual duels with biblical quotations may not always be the best way to go.
Very true. However, merely pointing out a relevant Scripture concerning being ready to answer what is the hope we have is not the same as having an intellecual duel.
So in terms of simple nuts and bolts, I tell people who are interested enough to ask – throw the question at God and see where He leads you. I tell them that I am sure that God will lead them to the Catholic Church. I have enough confidence in God, in the correctness of my answer (the Catholic Church) and in the earnestness of the person asking, that I truly believe that they will end up in the right place. Then I am willing to share my prayers and my resources if the person has any questions about my Church.
Is that consistent with Catholic Scripture, including 1 Peter 3:15? Notice the words “give an account for the hope that is in you”. Prayers and rescources are fine and good, however, that is not what we are told to do, we are told to give an account of the hope that is in us.

God bless,

Michael
 
I read this and thought “score one for the OP”.

“Having intellectual duels with biblical quotations may not always be the best way to go.”
Very true. However, merely pointing out a relevant Scripture concerning being ready to answer what is the hope we have is not the same as having an intellecual duel.

“So in terms of simple nuts and bolts, I tell people who are interested enough to ask – throw the question at God and see where He leads you. I tell them that I am sure that God will lead them to the Catholic Church. I have enough confidence in God, in the correctness of my answer (the Catholic Church) and in the earnestness of the person asking, that I truly believe that they will end up in the right place. Then I am willing to share my prayers and my resources if the person has any questions about my Church.”
Is that consistent with Catholic Scripture, including 1 Peter 3:15? Notice the words “give an account for the hope that is in you”. Prayers and rescources are fine and good, however, that is not what we are told to do, we are told to give an account of the hope that is in us.

God bless,

Michael
“Score one” sounds like a intellectual duel to me.

No one in their right mind would dispute the value of knowing the Bible and quoting it when appropriate.

However, Jesus knew scripture better than any of us do, and He did not engage in frequent intellectual battles trying to win people over. I do not believe that such battles succeed in winning people over. Once a person has earnestness and an open heart, then the treasures of the Bible will take root in their soul. But if a person is more interested in proving a point and does not enter a discussion with an cooperative heart, you will get nowhere with them. Then, like Jesus did when confronted with hard-hearted people who were trying to defend their own position a priori, you should walk away from the discussion and not waste your time.

Regarding “give an account for the hope that is in us,” I don’t believe that this command specified whether we need to give account by quoting the Bible or whether our beliefs can be stated with certitude in alternate ways. Hope in God can be based in intellectual conviction for some, but for others, it is a feeling of certitude that stems from deep prayer and relationship with Our Lord and resides primarily in the heart.

Is it not glorious how different we all are and how God accomodates all of our ways?

We can certainly come to agreement that both Scripture and prayer and personal relationship with God are essential!

Peace.

.
 
As can be seen in this thread and several others, words often fail to impress, despite their truth and completeness. Some evangelization, as in casting some demons out, can be accomplished only through prayer. As time passes, I see the increasing role that prayer plays in God’s perfect plan. Since each soul responds differently and to different techniques, it is increasingly clear to me that all respond to the love of God in all of its manifestations. May our actions, words and prayers toward those with interest in the faith be magnified by the Lord to illuminate those seeking hearts.

Christ’s peace be with you.
 
So yes, I realize that God with the Holy Spirit will lead in various ways, and the “nuts and bolts” can be expressed in different ways. HOWEVER, is it incorrect not to answer in one’s own words?
Incorrect or not, the point is whenever we answer in our own words we would fall short of the full Truth of the matter. Our intellect and pride would act as a barrier to what the Spirit would have said.
I agree, “By the grace of God” is the introduction to the nuts and bolts, not the completed sentence/sentences that speak of the nuts and bolts. Protestants can correctly start the same way… are their nuts and bolts different than ours?
Jesus is the Truth, the Light and the Way and it really is only through the grace of God that any Christian comes to know this as fact. Since Catholics are Christians first and foremost I would expect us to start from there. Yes, the nuts and bolts differ after that, however, depending upon how far away from the Church a particular denomination wandered.
You are correct, getting into Liturgy and the Saints takes one out of the realm of a “brief response”, and might be argued to be out of the realm of the “nuts and bolts” Reconciliation can be seen as part of the “nuts and bolts”, as Jesus proclaimed “repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand”. Yet using the term reconciliation might not be at the level to start with, being more of a Catholic terminology, than a nonCatholic terminology. The Eucharist also pertains, yet the term is more a Catholic term and might be viewed as beyond the starting level. Mentionin Jesus dying for our sins on the cross might be more to the “nuts and bolts”. Jn 12:32 “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself.”
Protestant denominations don’t adhere to the seven sacraments. They don’t believe in Reconciliation so that takes it out of the ‘nuts and bolts’. And for the Eucharist they don’t believe in transubstantiation, so that too, takes it out of the ‘nuts and bolts’ realm.

We’d both begin with “by the grace of God”
The protestants would then present Scripture as their ‘nuts and bolts’.
Catholics would present the Real Presence as their ‘nuts and bolts’
 
“Score one” sounds like a intellectual duel to me.

It was not meant to sound that way, merely saying that the response seemed to give credence to the OP’s over generalization. My opinion is not binding, nor do I assume it is necessarily accurate of the reality, just the impression from my own observation of the post.

No one in their right mind would dispute the value of knowing the Bible and quoting it when appropriate.

Great. Now for us to figure out when is appropriate? Perhaps when someone asks one to explain their faith in Christ, that might not necessarily be an appropriate time?

However, Jesus knew scripture better than any of us do, and He did not engage in frequent intellectual battles trying to win people over.

Yes, and He referred to Scriptuer both directly and indirectly. A wonderful example. And when confronted with intellectual “battles” such as in Mt 19 concerning divorce, there He goes with Scripture. He did win people over, hence there are Christians, and He was engaged in “intellectual” battles by the Pharisees and Saduccess, and Scripture was a ready sword.

I do not believe that such battles succeed in winning people over.

Someone asking us to give an explaination of what we believe is not necessarily a battle, it is an opportunity. And sometimes we are called to spiritual battles. 1 Cor 14:6-8 6But now, brethren, if I come to you speaking in tongues, what will I profit you unless I speak to you either by way of revelation or of knowledge or of prophecy or of teaching? Yet even lifeless things, either flute or harp, in producing a sound, if they do not produce a distinction in the tones, how will it be known what is played on the flute or on the harp? For if the bugle produces an indistinct sound, who will prepare himself for battle?"

Once a person has earnestness and an open heart, then the treasures of the Bible will take root in their soul. But if a person is more interested in proving a point and does not enter a discussion with an cooperative heart, you will get nowhere with them. Then, like Jesus did when confronted with hard-hearted people who were trying to defend their own position a priori, you should walk away from the discussion and not waste your time.
Jesus answered and spoke and taught, and some responded and some did not. It was after He taught that He went on His way.

Regarding “give an account for the hope that is in us,” I don’t believe that this command specified whether we need to give account by quoting the Bible or whether our beliefs can be stated with certitude in alternate ways.
I don’t believe that either, one can give an account without quoting or reference Scripture. It’s giving the account, and how we give it that are important. At the same time, since Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, then it might sometimes be helpful to refer to in when giving an account of what we believe.

Hope in God can be based in intellectual conviction for some, but for others, it is a feeling of certitude that stems from deep prayer and relationship with Our Lord and resides primarily in the heart.
Faith in God does not need to be an intellectual conviction, yet is not inconsistent with reason and knowledge. Many people have feelings about something that is dear to their heart. If they can’t vocalize it, is it much more than a feeling? How do we give an account for a feeling?

Is it not glorious how different we all are and how God accomodates all of our ways?

Yes, yet there is one Gospel, not different Gospels to suit different feellings. If one doesn’t give an account of their hope, how do they really know what that hope is, or whether it is more than a heart felt feeling? Galatians 1:6-8 "I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you, he is to be accursed! " How do we know if we are leaning toward a different Gospel, unless we can express in “a nut shell” the Gospel, and thus compare?

We can certainly come to agreement that both Scripture and prayer and personal relationship with God are essential!

True. So can we describe to others that personal relationship, with or without Scripture, in our own words, since it is a personal relationship? Judas had a personal relationship; perhaps he did not pray and know the Word of God in a way that resulted in personal relationship that led him to faith and trust in Jesus? With all three, did Judas still not understand and believe?

Peace.

.
God bless,

Michael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top