Everyone...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Truth_Seeker123
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I’d still like to either see a) the correspondence or b) TS123’s answer to, “Is Jesus God and the second Person of the Trinity?”

Though, if he were to just admit he’s a JW, we can move on with the Jesus question since we already know the answer.

I also think it’s wrong TS123 wont share his denomination because if we have any misconceptions, he could clear those up…unless he cannot do that.
 
I’d still like to either see a) the correspondence or b) TS123’s answer to, “Is Jesus God and the second Person of the Trinity?”

Though, if he were to just admit he’s a JW, we can move on with the Jesus question since we already know the answer.

I also think it’s wrong TS123 wont share his denomination because if we have any misconceptions, he could clear those up…unless he cannot do that.
So, you want me to say I’m a JW so you can tell me what I believe? That’s exactly why I won’t reveal it.

You don’t want to clear anything up. You want to discredit me in any way. I don’t get it. Why do you continue to ask a question that you obviously won’t get the answer to?
 
So, you want me to say I’m a JW so you can tell me what I believe? That’s exactly why I won’t reveal it.

You don’t want to clear anything up. You want to discredit me in any way. I don’t get it. Why do you continue to ask a question that you obviously won’t get the answer to?
You are telling Catholics what we believe. You want to discredit Catholics in any way.

You avoid questions, the whole time stating a ‘two way’ discussion. You clearly have an agenda and remaining hidden, or in the dark, is part of it.
 
So where is the part about me saying that the questions where too hard for me to answer? I see you keep ignoring that, but I’m being accused. Add that to the list of personal attacks that has been made. Yet no one sees anything wrong with how you made a false claim about me openly as if it were true.

Yet I’m the one being attacked here. I’m engaging in a two way discussion, yet no one can see that. Instead, you continue to say I don’t respond. What is it that I am doing now?

Although I will say this. I WILL NOT REVEAL MY DENOMINATION. Let it go. I won’t continue to talk about it either. So when I stop responding, don’t bash my name. I’m letting you know now that I will stop soon.
 
That’s exactly why I won’t reveal it.

QUOTE]

TS, are you not proud of your denomination? It seems strange to me that someone who comes onto a Catholic website would not reveal to others what kind of religious background they have and share that with others, regardless of their reactions.
 
So where is the part about me saying that the questions where too hard for me to answer? I see you keep ignoring that, but I’m being accused. Add that to the list of personal attacks that has been made. Yet no one sees anything wrong with how you made a false claim about me openly as if it were true.

Yet I’m the one being attacked here. I’m engaging in a two way discussion, yet no one can see that. Instead, you continue to say I don’t respond. What is it that I am doing now?

Although I will say this. I WILL NOT REVEAL MY DENOMINATION. Let it go. I won’t continue to talk about it either. So when I stop responding, don’t bash my name. I’m letting you know now that I will stop soon.
You almost made me cry!!!

Can’t be JW, as they are not Christian and you claim to be.

BTW, you have not held an honest debate or discussion since you first started your stick and move style of posting. In your mind you can “correct” us mislead people who call ourselves Catholic. But you cannot back it up with anything but your own interpretation; which by the very fact that there are so many different denominations it is obvious that sola scriptura and “personal interpretation” are flawed at best.
 
So where is the part about me saying that the questions where too hard for me to answer? I see you keep ignoring that, but I’m being accused. Add that to the list of personal attacks that has been made. Yet no one sees anything wrong with how you made a false claim about me openly as if it were true.

Yet I’m the one being attacked here. I’m engaging in a two way discussion, yet no one can see that. Instead, you continue to say I don’t respond. What is it that I am doing now?

Although I will say this. I WILL NOT REVEAL MY DENOMINATION. Let it go. I won’t continue to talk about it either. So when I stop responding, don’t bash my name. I’m letting you know now that I will stop soon.
Look at all the effort you are putting into remaining ‘hidden’. You could have simply answered the questions about Jesus with a lot less effort. :rolleyes:
 
Jharek,

Thank you for letting us see the correspondance in question. While TS’s is not really a long reply, I think it was rather dismissive of him. He has time to answer why he’s not online, BUT, he cannot say, “Yes, because…,” or, “No, because…” to your question, or, even answer you with a one word answer with the promise to get back to you later. It’s also reflecting on his pride that he would like you to act as his messenger, he only replied to you (as far as we know), and asks you to please relay the message that he will not be avalible. What does this tell us about his psychological status? He is setting the rules. He wouldn’t answer you, but, instead deflected with a request that you rephrase your question and be nicer. When you do, he tells you he cannot get into it right now…sandwiched between him saying that he’s checking his PM’s and he cannot reply to his PM’s, and he’d be much obliged if you could let everybody know that he is so busy, and if you could let it be made known, publicly that he’s not a bad guy.

Essentially, what we have is somebody who says, ’ will not tell you my denomination, I will tell you what I believe,’ and then deflects the reply of his beliefs to, ‘I have things to do, please let everybody know I have things to do.’
So, you want me to say I’m a JW so you can tell me what I believe? That’s exactly why I won’t reveal it.

You don’t want to clear anything up. You want to discredit me in any way. I don’t get it. Why do you continue to ask a question that you obviously won’t get the answer to?
So, then, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?

Again, you are deflecting. You’re telling me what I want. I think this is projecting on your part.

I don’t want to discredit you, you can easily do that yourself.

Well, if for no other reason, to show your credibility. We’re giving you oportunities here and you refuse to accept.
So where is the part about me saying that the questions where too hard for me to answer? I see you keep ignoring that, but I’m being accused. Add that to the list of personal attacks that has been made. Yet no one sees anything wrong with how you made a false claim about me openly as if it were true.

Yet I’m the one being attacked here. I’m engaging in a two way discussion, yet no one can see that. Instead, you continue to say I don’t respond. What is it that I am doing now?

Although I will say this. I WILL NOT REVEAL MY DENOMINATION. Let it go. I won’t continue to talk about it either. So when I stop responding, don’t bash my name. I’m letting you know now that I will stop soon.
You are not engaging in a two way discussion, you are talking down to people. You’re not engaging, you are dictating. You do not respond, you deflect.

On a final note, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?
 
So where is the part about me saying that the questions where too hard for me to answer? I see you keep ignoring that, but I’m being accused. Add that to the list of personal attacks that has been made. Yet no one sees anything wrong with how you made a false claim about me openly as if it were true.

Yet I’m the one being attacked here. I’m engaging in a two way discussion, yet no one can see that. Instead, you continue to say I don’t respond. What is it that I am doing now?

Although I will say this. I WILL NOT REVEAL MY DENOMINATION. Let it go. I won’t continue to talk about it either. So when I stop responding, don’t bash my name. I’m letting you know now that I will stop soon.
JL: I think Truth Seeker belongs to one of the many split offs of the Hubert Armstrong World Wide Church of God. When Armstrong died the new leadership brought the WWC of God back to a trinitarian faith along with other doctrinal changes to a more orthodox Protestant belief. There were many splits from there into many small groups holding Hubert Armstrong’s original teachings, they consider him a prophet.

I will take a guess and say she belongs to the Philidelphia Church of God, one of the many split offs. If not mistaken this group believes Christ is God and the Father is God. The Holy Spirit is a force, I don’t know if they believe there are two Gods or one God in two person. I would guess they hold two Gods one mighty and one almighty similar to JWs.
 
Jharek,

Thank you for letting us see the correspondance in question. While TS’s is not really a long reply, I think it was rather dismissive of him. He has time to answer why he’s not online, BUT, he cannot say, “Yes, because…,” or, “No, because…” to your question, or, even answer you with a one word answer with the promise to get back to you later. It’s also reflecting on his pride that he would like you to act as his messenger, he only replied to you (as far as we know), and asks you to please relay the message that he will not be avalible. What does this tell us about his psychological status? He is setting the rules. He wouldn’t answer you, but, instead deflected with a request that you rephrase your question and be nicer. When you do, he tells you he cannot get into it right now…sandwiched between him saying that he’s checking his PM’s and he cannot reply to his PM’s, and he’d be much obliged if you could let everybody know that he is so busy, and if you could let it be made known, publicly that he’s not a bad guy.

Essentially, what we have is somebody who says, ’ will not tell you my denomination, I will tell you what I believe,’ and then deflects the reply of his beliefs to, ‘I have things to do, please let everybody know I have things to do.’

So, then, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?

Again, you are deflecting. You’re telling me what I want. I think this is projecting on your part.

I don’t want to discredit you, you can easily do that yourself.

Well, if for no other reason, to show your credibility. We’re giving you oportunities here and you refuse to accept.

You are not engaging in a two way discussion, you are talking down to people. You’re not engaging, you are dictating. You do not respond, you deflect.

On a final note, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?
No I am not a JW and what part of I won’t tell you don’t you get?
 
No I am not a JW and what part of I won’t tell you don’t you get?
Strange you have time to argue that you won’t tell your Church affliation, but don’t have time to answer the question about your view of Christ. :hmmm:
 
Strange you have time to argue that you won’t tell your Church affliation, but don’t have time to answer the question about your view of Christ. :hmmm:
JL: Prodigal, the simple answer is they cannot defend thier faith beliefs and they know it.
 
I don’t know if any of you have read this document, but I think it is something everyone should see. No matter what denomination you are. Please read the entire document before assuming anything about anyone or this thread.

This has to do with Protestants, SDA protestants and Catholics.

So again, please take the time to read it before jumping to any conclusions.

aloha.net/~mikesch/chalng.htm

I know some of you will give me feedback whether I ask or not…lol

But please read the document.
And your point is======
 
Church of Christ!
JL: Whatever the name of TS’s particular group TS is a follower of Hubert Amstrong. My GUESS is Philadelphia Church of God. They publish the magazine called, “The Plain Truth”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top