Jharek,
Thank you for letting us see the correspondance in question. While TS’s is not really a long reply, I think it was rather dismissive of him. He has time to answer why he’s not online, BUT, he cannot say, “Yes, because…,” or, “No, because…” to your question, or, even answer you with a one word answer with the promise to get back to you later. It’s also reflecting on his pride that he would like you to act as his messenger, he only replied to you (as far as we know), and asks you to please relay the message that he will not be avalible. What does this tell us about his psychological status? He is setting the rules. He wouldn’t answer you, but, instead deflected with a request that you rephrase your question and be nicer. When you do, he tells you he cannot get into it right now…sandwiched between him saying that he’s checking his PM’s and he cannot reply to his PM’s, and he’d be much obliged if you could let everybody know that he is so busy, and if you could let it be made known, publicly that he’s not a bad guy.
Essentially, what we have is somebody who says, ’ will not tell you my denomination, I will tell you what I believe,’ and then deflects the reply of his beliefs to, ‘I have things to do, please let everybody know I have things to do.’
So, then, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?
Again, you are deflecting. You’re telling me what I want. I think this is projecting on your part.
I don’t want to discredit you, you can easily do that yourself.
Well, if for no other reason, to show your credibility. We’re giving you oportunities here and you refuse to accept.
You are not engaging in a two way discussion, you are talking down to people. You’re not engaging, you are dictating. You do not respond, you deflect.
On a final note, are you a Jehovah’s Witness?