Evolution and Creationism

  • Thread starter Thread starter DictatorCzar
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Evolution preaches a gain in New Bio-Info

Ergo - a Series of Natural Selections can never lead to a new and improved being aka Macro-Evolution
Evolutionist have bit off more than they can chew, there are millions of different species of fungi alone… and… that’s just fungi, the list goes on and on !

A more recent publication (Microbiology Spectrum) published in July of 2017, estimates the number is between 2.2 and 3.8 million.

https://www.lanl.gov/museum/news/newsletter/2018/01/fungi.php
 
40.png
EndTimes:
Evolution preaches a gain in New Bio-Info

Ergo - a Series of Natural Selections can never lead to a new and improved being aka Macro-Evolution
Evolutionist have bit off more than they can chew, there are millions of different species of fungi alone… and… that’s just fungi, the list goes on and on !

A more recent publication (Microbiology Spectrum) published in July of 2017, estimates the number is between 2.2 and 3.8 million.

How many species of fungi are there?
I missed the bit in Genesis that mentioned funghi species. Why on earth do you think God created over 3 million of them. Would have taken Adam forever to name them all. But I guess…who can know the mind of God.
 
Yeah. Nobody bred cattle or sheep or dogs in Darwins day. Nobody noticed that tall parents had tall offspring. Nobody had the slightest idea that characteristics were inheritable.
Because there was no tall parents with short children or short parents with tall children during Darwin’s time. This was enough to put that speculation to rest.

Darwin didn’t know anything about Genetics or hereditary science and so the basis for evolution was off.
 
Last edited:
I missed the bit in Genesis that mentioned funghi species. Why on earth do you think God created over 3 million of them. Would have taken Adam forever to name them all. But I guess…who can know the mind of God.
‘Name’ as used in the bible means authority and not identity or taxa. Adam named Eve ‘woman’ because ‘woman’ is an authority.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
Yeah. Nobody bred cattle or sheep or dogs in Darwins day. Nobody noticed that tall parents had tall offspring. Nobody had the slightest idea that characteristics were inheritable.
Because there was no tall parents with short children or short parents with tall children during Darwin’s time.
Well, yeah. Most tall people have tall children. Most red headed parents have red headed children. Heriditary characteristics. This was common knowledge centuries before Darwin. Did I really need to put scare quotes around ‘Nobody had the slightest idea that characteristics were inheritable’ so you’d know that was sarcasm?

Nobody needed to know how it was done. Including Darwin. He just needed the fact that it happened to work out his theory.
 
40.png
Freddy:
I missed the bit in Genesis that mentioned funghi species. Why on earth do you think God created over 3 million of them. Would have taken Adam forever to name them all. But I guess…who can know the mind of God.
‘Name’ as used in the bible means authority and not identity or taxa. Adam named Eve ‘woman’ because ‘woman’ is an authority.
Ah. Lucky for Adam. It would have taken him ages. But any idea why God was so keen on making so many species? Seems like overkill to me. A few dozen would be sufficient, surely. But three million…?
 
Well, yeah. Most tall people have tall children. Most red headed parents have red headed children. Heriditary characteristics. This was common knowledge centuries before Darwin. Did I really need to put scare quotes around ‘Nobody had the slightest idea that characteristics were inheritable’ so you’d know that was sarcasm?

Nobody needed to know how it was done. Including Darwin. He just needed the fact that it happened to work out his theory.
Common knowledge is not science and so is evolution, thanks for the confirmation.

Before one concludes that tall parents will only have tall children, they need to explain why that one or two families are displaying a different phenomenon.
 
Ah. Lucky for Adam. It would have taken him ages . But any idea why God was so keen on making so many species? Seems like overkill to me. A few dozen would be sufficient, surely. But three million…?
God doesn’t ‘make’, creation is an expression of wisdom and understanding and the understanding of God is much more than 3 million species. 3M species is just what you have discovered or think you have an understanding of.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
Well, yeah. Most tall people have tall children. Most red headed parents have red headed children. Heriditary characteristics. This was common knowledge centuries before Darwin. Did I really need to put scare quotes around ‘Nobody had the slightest idea that characteristics were inheritable’ so you’d know that was sarcasm?

Nobody needed to know how it was done. Including Darwin. He just needed the fact that it happened to work out his theory.
Common knowledge is not science.
Observation is the basis for science.
 
40.png
Freddy:
Ah. Lucky for Adam. It would have taken him ages . But any idea why God was so keen on making so many species? Seems like overkill to me. A few dozen would be sufficient, surely. But three million…?
God doesn’t ‘make’, creation is an expression of wisdom and understanding and the understanding of God is much more than 3 million species. 3M species is just what you have discovered or think you have an understanding of.
So He didn’t create them. So they…evolved?
 
Observation is the basis for science.
Well, there are so many things beyond what we can observe.
Darwin must have observed a display of a phenomenon different from what he was proposing.
 
Last edited:
So an advantage in surviving is a backward step
Nothing in the real world has an advantage or disadvantage everything works in perfect harmony .

God created a food chain that supports life, everything has its own niche in this hierarchy of life.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
So He didn’t create them. So they…evolved?
I have just explained to you what creation means.
Yeah. It didn’t make any sense. Did God create Adam? It says so in the bible. Did He create all the birds of the air and fish in the sea etc etc? It says so in the bible. So did He create the funghi as well? Three million species?

What do you think?
 
40.png
Freddy:
He observed heritable characteristics. He then offered an explanation for the diversity of life.
The conclusion from an observation could be right or wrong.
So they can be. But heritable characteristics is an observation that’s correct. You and I both know this. Don’t paint yourself into a corner, Noose.
 
Last edited:
Yeah. It didn’t make any sense. Did God create Adam? It says so in the bible. Did He create all the birds of the air and fish in the sea etc etc? It says so in the bible. So did He create the funghi as well? Three million species?

What do you think?
Yes He did, what’s your point?
 
40.png
Freddy:
So an advantage in surviving is a backward step
Nothing in the real world has an advantage or disadvantage everything works in perfect harmony .

God created a food chain that supports life, everything has its own niche in this hierarchy of life.
Except the ones that go extinct. But gee, if only they were able to adapt to a changing environment…
 
So they can be. But heritable characteristics is an observation that’s correct. You and I both know this. Don’t paint yourself into a corner, Noose.
Pangenesis was Charles Darwin’s hypothetical mechanism for heredity, in which he proposed that each part of the body continually emitted its own type of small organic particles called gemmules that aggregated in the gonads, contributing heritable information to the gametes. Wikipedia

Such erroneous ideas explains why evolution is wrong from its foundations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top