Evolution and Darwin against Religion and God

  • Thread starter Thread starter John121
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You’ve openly rejected the established science of evolution multiple times on this thread.

Science doesn’t say anything about God though. Like it literally doesn’t. Richard Dawkins’ political ideology isn’t even close to mainstream science.

Using the word “design” doesn’t make the conspiracy theory of intelligent design anymore valid. The Church literally does not endorse intelligent design.
 
edwest211 said:
"asked us to accept the proposition that, like all other organisms, we too are the products of a random process that, as far as science can show, we are not created for any special purpose or as part of any universal design.”
Click to expand...
Paaarp. Evolution is not random.

Why aren’t you learning anything about the subject? Surely some of it would rub off how ever hard you try to ignore it.
 
You can believe that if you want to. A reading of Church documents shows that God - yes, I know, there’s a massive wall areund science - must be the cause of life and the development of life.
 
By the way, Richard Dawkins is all about denying the Bible and promoting atheism. I will not allow atheism to ‘rub off’ on me. The Church doesn’t promote it.
 
no the language you quoted left out that its mindless. quote me mindless in the quote I quoted.
 
edwest211 said:
You are calling the Church’s claims fallacious. You are free to do so, but I will continue to post those claims.
Click to expand...
No, I’m saying I don’t view you as an authority. I’m not saying anything against the Church.
 
edwest211 said:
By the way, Richard Dawkins is all about denying the Bible and promoting atheism. I will not allow atheism to ‘rub off’ on me. The Church doesn’t promote it.
Click to expand...
It’s his right as a citizen of a free country. He also makes it clear in his popular writings that science cannot disprove the existence of God. In other words, he knows the limits of science.

But rejecting a theory because some people view at a means to reject Christianity, or your version of it anyways, is pretty strange reasoning.
 
Not at all. The Church has made it clear: life and the development of life must involve God. I will continue to quote the Church.
 
edwest211 said:
Not at all. The Church has made it clear: life and the development of life must involve God. I will continue to quote the Church.
Click to expand...
And that’s fine. It’s just not where science can go, and you can no more criticize science for that stance in evolution than you can criticize science for that for plate tectonics or Ohm’s Law.
 
I am not attacking anyone’s precious science, I am promoting Church teaching.
 
All that article says about peer reviewed papers is how bad they supposedly are because they don’t support intelligent design.
 
What I do and do not believe is irrelevant. Evolution happens regardless of what anyone does or does not believe.

Evolution literally says nothing about the cause or origin of life.
 
Richard Dawkins is a nut job with a political agenda. He is not representative of mainstream scientific thought.

One does not need to be atheist to accept evolution.
 
I don’t believe that. Why? It’s not logical. The man behind the curtain created life. Trust us wink wink
 
You’ve literally presented zero peer reviewed papers which endorse intelligent design. Zero.

I refuse to blindly accept whatever some random person on the internet says over professionals who have dedicated their entire lives to the study.
 
What you believe or don’t believe it irrelevant. Science doesn’t care what your beliefs are, it just cares about the way things are regardless of you think.

Who’s “us”?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top