Evolution is contradictory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buss0042
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Confidence in any references you cite as bing solid and accurate is fast diminishing. Scientists don’t use dodgy hijacked write your own science adventures, to prove points, like that mob are doing
 
Roseeurekacross said:
discuss how one palaeontologist’s potential discovery, as yet unverified, has been hijacked by young earth creationists to refute evolution.

And how she feels about that. Shall we?
Click to expand...
It doesn’t really matter in terms of getting to the truth, what she thinks of it. People are free to use the scientific facts as they wish. That is most certainly the case with evolution. As to how long ago there were dinosaurs, I don’t know, but tend towards the geological understanding of time as being the best way to think about it. But then, I thought some things bizarre that later turned out to be closer to a truth that I hadn’t even imagined.
 
Last edited:
Really, so truth is not your truth,

The accepted in situ ongoing research informing a scientific community , that truth can be deconstructed to suit yourself,. According to the People throwing their false data all around the internet.

Or those deconstructing it to reinvent a falsehood as a truth. The dialogue being this, We tested some old marrowbone and it was x yrs old , therefore we are right. Let’s forget about the lab responses that invalidate the dates as being accurate
The scientific community then says , your methodology had errors. Fix it and try again. The deconstructionists ( I would call them dodgy scammers) then go cry in their weetbix.

A leg is still a leg, the sky still the sky.

Find valid and accepted proofs if you want an argument to be taken seriously
 
Last edited:
rossum said:
Phages are not bacteria. Phages are not somehow designed into bacteria. Phages are “Bacteriophages” which are viruses that attack bacteria. They have nothing at all to do with the ‘latent bacterial memories’ you were talking about earlier.
Click to expand...
They are packed with information.

Fighting Fire with Fire: Killing bacteria with virus

Loading…

sitn.hms.harvard.edu
 
The worst part is they are conning people like yourselves, who are diving head first down a narrowing rabbit hole,
 
Aloysium said:
The sun does rise in the east. The earth appears to be like the back of a giant tortoise. At least those are true from their limited frame of reference.
Click to expand...
That may have been considered true by some people before people knew for a fact that it wasn’t. It’s not that modern theory is a “more concise, more comprehensive way of understanding” that refutes the tortoise theory. It’s the fact that the tortoise theory has be proven to be factually false. You do that with evolution and I’ll believe you. But if you just try to offer nicer sounding alternatives, I don’t care.
 
Buffalo it would be a good exercise if you did this yourself, actually discovered what her work is all about and why it’s WRONG for people to be doing this.
Start by reading my coffee table Smithsonian link and, go look at her works
 
Roseeurekacross said:
Buffalo it would be a good exercise if you did this yourself, actually discovered what her work is all about and why it’s WRONG for people to be doing this.
Start by reading my coffee table Smithsonian link and, go look at her works
Click to expand...
Another strike. I think that is 3. You are out. You have nothing, nada. Just some hand waving.
 
Aloysium said:
You are speaking only to yourself and others who share in the same illusion. Quit it with the ad hominems already!
Click to expand...
On the contrary, the credentials of Mr. Miller are very relevant if you expect me to give his thoughts any more consideration that some guy sitting next to me on the bus.
 
Is the problem for you, that you cannot understand what Mary is doing?

Is the problem for you , that you don’t have access to articles about her work, on the internet. ?

What is the problem?
Do you think Mary is carbon dating Dinosaur tissue ?

Have you not read rossum’s post, my link, or the work of the good Christian lady herself?

What’s the problem that you don’t look at even the coffee table Smithsonian link?
 
LeafByNiggle said:
On the contrary, the credentials of Mr. Miller are very relevant if you expect me to give his thoughts any more consideration that some guy sitting next to me on the bus.
Click to expand...
He didn’t do the RC tests. A lab did. Do you know which one? Why are they not qualified?
 
buffalo said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
On the contrary, the credentials of Mr. Miller are very relevant if you expect me to give his thoughts any more consideration that some guy sitting next to me on the bus.
Click to expand...
He didn’t do the RC tests. A lab did. Do you know which one? Why are they not qualified?
Click to expand...
We don’t know how he collected his specimen - whether he spit into it, for instance.
 
Roseeurekacross said:
Buffalo it would be a good exercise if you did this yourself, actually discovered what her work is all about and why it’s WRONG for people to be doing this.
Start by reading my coffee table Smithsonian link and, go look at her works
Click to expand...
Are you really going down this road? I know a lot about Schweitzer and her work. I think it is you who doesn’t quite get what is going on.

She certainly does not want to get fired or lose her funding. She admitted as much in an article.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
We don’t know how he collected his specimen - whether he spit into it, for instance.
Click to expand...
OK - that is why someone else not affiliated should supply the samples and designate the lab. Or go out into the field with him to be a witness that he is not spitting into it.
 
Aloysium said:
I am here as just another random internet idiot posting random opinions, a target for whatever fantasies the reader wishes to project.

I don’t expect much learning to happen on this modern version of the Tower of Babel.

My post above appears relevant in this case as well. Why not argue the points I make.

Let me add that you have not made a good impression on the other side of this communication divide.
Click to expand...
Consistently, those who don’t like what the Church says, or what science says, and don’t even understand the material, resort to this.
Where would I begin? Your statement illustrates that you have no elementary understanding of the science.
You have a responsibility to educate yourself if you are going to blog publicly.
 
goout said:
You have a responsibility to educate yourself if you are going to blog publicly.
Click to expand...
It Seems to me that yesterday you were being annoyingly condescending too. Nobody needs to conform to your standards. Go eat a cookie and take a nap. Perhaps then you’ll be civil 🤨
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top