Evolution: Is There Any Good Reason To Reject The Abiogenesis Hypothesis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
buffalo said:
You routinely use this very same ploy.
Click to expand...
It is the theologians who do not recant and continue to disagree. Christian theologians fat God is Triune; Jewish theologians say G-d is One.

In that case it is reasonable to doubt the nature of God: one or three?
 
He [the Designer] indeed seems to have “carefully crafted” information in His species giving them the ability to respond to environmental stimuli to alter their own genome to adapt to new environments. He then evidently let them wander where they will with the ability to adapt.- Dr. Lee Spetner “the Evolution Revolution” p 108
 
Not only to adapt:

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
 
rossum said:
40.png
Aloysium:
Not only to adapt:
Click to expand...
Google “sexual selection”.
Click to expand...
This brings to mind the nuances of communication and their basis in how we understand the world, our motivations and ultimately choices. My post to which this is a reply, was meant to address Buffalo’s quote:
buffalo said:
He then evidently let them wander where they will with the ability to adapt.
Click to expand...
But, I had started a response to your post:
rossum said:
It is the theologians who do not recant and continue to disagree. Christian theologians fat God is Triune; Jewish theologians say G-d is One.

In that case it is reasonable to doubt the nature of God: one or three?
Click to expand...
And, I gave up because it can be a rather difficult topic, requiring a lengthier reply than is allowed on forum threads, likely not to be read and not understood. So I gave up and decided to add a simple comment to the later post.

Seems the sense of futility is mutual.

I would like to point out however, the tremendous impact that the psychological has on the diversity of life on earth. It is actually the basis of what is termed natural selection, involving the relationships between the totality of an organism with its environment. Although physics and chemistry are necessarily involved, since we are dealing with material creatures, what survival entails are instinctive perceptual, emotional, cognitive and behavioural patterns of relation to everything that is other to the individual living thing. Obviously these qualities, however they are expressed, are required for the organism to obtain the food necessary to transform matter into itself, to avoid the dangers that would terminate its existence as an individual entity, and to propagate its kind.
 
Last edited:
edwest211 said:
Life from chemicals - no people or mice.
Click to expand...
Scientists have produced some, but not all of the chemicals in life: amino acids, purines and pyrimidines for example.

Creationists have not shown us any miraculously produced chemicals, or life, from their labs or churches/synagogues.mosques/temples etc.

Currently science is leading, but the race is not yet over.
 
edwest211 said:
No. Life cannot be created from scratch/chemicals.
Click to expand...
No, man cannot build a heavier than air flying machine.

You are relying on what science cannot currently do, ed. That is not a secure foundation. What science can do is always changing and growing; you are trying to build on a foundation of shifting sand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top