I have. That is how I know that your claim is ridiculous.
Beautiful. This is entering the best time of year here.
then how do i have a clue what theory your talking about? how do i know i wont spend time researching the wrong thing?
You are the one who chose to enter this discussion with the claim (now retracted) that there are gaping flaws in the science. Now you want me to teach you something so that you can debate me? Perhaps you should find a topic you understand.
what claim was there to retract? did you find a premise, or an argument, or a logical conclusion drawn from it?
as i have said before i agree with the generalities as i know them, from a lack of interest more than anything else.
So you don’t retract? You actually want to defend a statement that you claim is as serious an assertion as one that some people believe in Santa Claus? Really?
No, you made the claim. Only later did you blame it on others.
But you chose to continue the conversation. You are welcome to walk away any time you want.
But you said that you don’t know anything about the theory. How can you agree with any generality if you don’t know anything about the topic?
Then why keep this up? Why not just retract your original assertion?
So you are willing to make an assertion about something you admittedly know nothing about? Ok. Here is my detailed response to your assertion. You are wrong.
i cant retract a claim never made.
:crying:
So you don’t retract?
keep up i deleted that post
once again nothing to retract
no premise, no argument, no logical inference = no claim
you have parsed one sentence and assumed arguments from it.
thats like seeing picture of a car and assuming it is a car
no claim to retract, no premise, no argument, no logical inference
which is it you want me to defend a non-existent claim or you dont?
.
where are you? did you walk away?
the same way you can parse one sentence to find an actual argument.
why do you keep this up?
what assertion, the one that had no premise, argument, or logical inference?
didnt you tell me too take the first shot?
great what evidence do you have?
:bowdown: :yeah_me:Vaults full of hominid skeletal remains.great what evidence do you have?
:whacky:
Of course not. You didn’t make the assertion that I referred to or that Barbarian tried to get you to back up. We all just made it up.
Do whatever you want to do. You claim they don’t exist, so I guess this discussion is done. Just remember in the future, if you make an assertion like “yes, you may accept it, but be careful of scientific orthodoxy, it sounds very correct, but there are gaping flaws, which are somehow impolitic to mention.”, you will be asked to back it up. Except, of course, you didn’t write that.
like a monkey mausoleum? sounds mostly like proof of dead monkeys
Since, by your own admission, you do not know a lot about evolution we can overlook your ignorance of the fact that monkeys are not hominids. Ignorance is curable by learning, you could start here: Understanding Evolution. I would suggest that you learn more so that you can avoid making further posts based on ignorance.like a monkey mausoleum? sounds mostly like proof of dead monkeys
Is it possible that life evolved somewhere in the universe first and designed the life that we find here on earth?
strangely enough if i said hominids arent monkeys, some one would say i am making a creationist argument.
or i could just think back to high school biology, where evolution is taught. or college biology I or II, or even more embarrasing , anthropology, or anatomy. of course the first stretch started in the summer of 1990, so forgive my ignorance of such things they did start more than 18 years ago. and i didnt really care about them then either.
back for more eh?
)Seems unlikely. Too many odd solutions, none of which look designed.