PJR:
The only things I notice a difference from EWTN in our parish is that we don’t sing the Gloria, Santus, etc in Latin; we have about a 50/50 split on handholders, and same on receiving on the tongue.
I agree with Puzzleannie, just didn’t want to drag the whole thing down.
That’s the problem. Some of us want the Latin and Greek. In fact, with the way our parish is growing, many of us want our Liturgy to include this.
Look at a quote from Puzzleannie…
“I have experienced charistmatic Masses, Life Teen Masses, children’s liturgies, polka Masses, Mariachi Masses, indult Tridentine Rite Masses, and Masses stripped to their bare essentials (as in certain retreat centers).”
What do you notice there?
Not a single one is an N.O. Mass with Latin and Greek, the EWTN type mass. The Indult is not allowed in all Diocese and if it is, it’s in a Downtown parish, not our home parishes. Those who want a more traditional Holy Mass are driving or out of luck.
It’s easy to say to us, just go with the flow and get used to the way we do things now, but while you can walk into any Catholic Church and feel comfortable, when I walk in there, I see less of the Holy Mass than I saw at the local Lutheran church.
And actually, this statement from the same poster…
“However, irregardless of the ancillary attributes of the celebration, every Mass has proclaimed the Word of God, praised God, and rendered Jesus Christ sacramentally present and therefore have been miracles and gifts of incalculable worth and beauty.”
states exactly what I am saying. If the Vatican declared that all masses should be in Latin, how comfortable would you be? The masses in my Diocese are foreign to me, but I just need to accept it, per this poster.
Looking at the responses on the poll, others would like some Latin as well.