Exaggerator in Chief

  • Thread starter Thread starter IQ170
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol when I was skimming through these new topics, I accidentally misread this thread’s title as “Exeggutor in Chief.”
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
(Or, if you prefer…)
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)
Alright, back to the topic.
 
As usual, most of these claims are just false themselves, or nearly so.

’
 
CNN seem to be a bit late in the game. Hasn’t the Washington Post count topped 10,000?
 
CNN seem to be a bit late in the game. Hasn’t the Washington Post count topped 10,000?
Probably, most being ideological differences. If they disagree, which is almost always, WaPo counts it a “lie”.
 
“Some” of us are under the conclusion that facts and lies are alternative: They are determined by what side of the political divide you stand on.

One reason there won’t (can’t) be a call to arms (reach across the aisle) and actually get something done is because they first and foremost cannot agree on a set of facts.

Since truth appears relative in todays day and age, the best thing to do regarding politics is vote on POLICIES. just a thought.
 
As usual, most of these claims are just false themselves, or nearly so.

’
According to one of the examples that was given, Mr. Trump said about his Orlando rally, "Outside there were – I mean, literally tens of thousands of people couldn’t get in.”

But according to the Orlando Sentinel:
But about an hour before the president’s speech, the long lines around the Amway
were gone and people could easily walk into the event right up to the start of the rally…
​

So, are you saying that there really were “tens of thousands” who couldn’t get into the rally and that the Orlando Sentinel is lying?

 
Last edited:
Am I supposed to care at this point?
Talk about beating a dead horse.
 
Until that moment it is important to expose him for what he is, a liar.
You’re late to the party.
Of course we all should know that no exposition will sway his core supporters, but it can and hopefully will influence those who are still willing to think for themselves.
Having more agreeable policies would likely be more effective.
 
“Some” of us are under the conclusion that facts and lies are alternative: They are determined by what side of the political divide you stand on.
The problem is that the press doesn’t seem to know (or care about) the difference between a fact and an opinion.
 
So, are you saying that there really were “tens of thousands” who couldn’t get into the rally and that the Orlando Sentinel is lying?
I would never accuse any mainstream media source of telling the truth. Wouldn’t want to hurt their feelings.
If there would be a world championship for liars (like the World Cup for soccer, or the World Series), Trump would win it hands down.
And it would be just as phony and political as Obama winning the Nobel Prize.
 
I was so hoping this is not about Trump! 😭
Or the broken record of about President Obama, worst yet, Clinton. on and on and on and on…

IF I’m on a news channel still complaining about the prior President with adverse comments to boot…time to change the channel, right?
 
40.png
DENNYINMI:
“Some” of us are under the conclusion that facts and lies are alternative: They are determined by what side of the political divide you stand on.
The problem is that the press doesn’t seem to know (or care about) the difference between a fact and an opinion.
I haven’t seen that to be the case. It’s a fact that there weren’t “tens of thousands” of people unable to get into Trump’s rally in Orlando as the Orlando Sentinel reported despite what Trump said. That’s a fact, not an opinion.
 
It’s a fact that there weren’t “tens of thousands” of people unable to get into Trump’s rally in Orlando as the Orlando Sentinel reported despite what Trump said
I agree…………!~
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top