T
TheLittleLady
Guest
Because if one questions the actions of Mr Trump, they gotta be pro-choice?
2% is well within the margin or error for most political surveys, so there was no statistically relevant change.Her lead dropped to about 2% almost immediately.
Were these lies? What is the evidence for that?I can name two downright lies
One can. But it would be better for all if we painted the truth using objective facts.You can paint this whatever way you want
That was the “fault” of the employer, not of the ACA.If your employer dropped its plan
One makes the choice to go on Medicaid, no one is “put there” against their will.Same if you were one of the ones put on Medicaid
Yet still this was your choice, you could have paid the higher premiums.Or if the increase in premiums simply drove you to the exchanges
How was that action mandated by the Act? There are all sorts of reasons why some one may have had to change doctors. Do people honestly fell that Obama was talking about all such contingencies, or just about what is required by the Act?If your employer dropped its plan and you went on the exchanges, quite possibly you had to change provider chains, including doctors.
No. Obamacare made employment-based plans much more expensive, particularly for small businesses. It wasn’t the employers’ “fault”.That was the “fault” of the employer, not of the ACA.
Sort of, but not really. If you didn’t qualify for the exchange that was your only choice. But you’re right, people could have declined the coverage entirely and had none.One makes the choice to go on Medicaid, no one is “put there” against their will.
Absolutely. Justice Roberts was right in saying it’s a tax. If you don’t want to pay it, you can move out of the country. Similarly, if you didn’t want to pay or couldn’t pay the much higher premiums if you couldn’t qualify for a subsidy, you could do without.Yet still this was your choice, you could have paid the higher premiums.
The insurance companies were free to choose not to raise prices, the employers were free to decide to ante up more for employee coverage. These may not have been palatable options, but, the option was there.No. Obamacare made employment-based plans much more expensive, particularly for small businesses. It wasn’t the employers’ “fault”.
And people were free to have no insurance at all. That may not have been a palatable option, but the option is there.The insurance companies were free to choose not to raise prices, the employers were free to decide to ante up more for employee coverage. These may not have been palatable options, but, the option was there.
Not in those words, but it removed many from their plan and/or physician. Gruber even admitted that the “you can keep your doctor” line was untrue and known to be untrue when Obamacare was passed.The Affordable Care Act did not remove anyone from their plan nor physician
Hyperbole is one thing. Lying to the public to hide the fact that most are going to pay a lot more for health insurance or be forced to do without it entirely so some would get it for free, is much more than mere hyperbole. It’s not only lying, it’s theft by deception.Well, as I am daily encouraged to do, consider it Official Presidential Hyperbole.
www.forbes.com
Trump’s hyperbolic statements cost me nothing. Obama’s cost plenty, and all by telling a known lie. That adds theft to the lie. If Obama had said “Hey, I’m going to tax a lot of you middle class people in order to heavily subsidize some other middle class people that I hope will become dependent on it and vote Democrat to keep it. And a lot of you will lose your insurance.” would have been fine if people had supported that. But he didn’t. He said health insurance would cost less for everyone, that there was no tax involved, and that one could keep one’s doctor and plan. None of it was true, and he knew it.Interesting how when my guy does it, excusable, even commendable exaggeration.
When the enemy does it, liar liar pants on fire.