Excommunication looms for American Maryknoll active in 'Womanpriest' rites

  • Thread starter Thread starter rpp
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rpp

Guest
This is very sad.
An American Maryknoll priests reports that he has been given 30 days to revoke his public support for the ordination of women or face excommunication. Father Roy Bourgeois, who has joined “Womanpriest” activists in attempting the ordination of women as priests, has told the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that he will not recant.
Full story here.

More here.

Comparing the priesthood to a job is like comparing a car to a tomato. It is not about “sexism”, it is about faithfulness to God. This priest appears more prideful than anything else.
 
Since he participated in the “ordination” by giving a homily at it on 9 August, it is good to see that those who guard the Faith have acted without delay in dealing with the situation.

Following the links in the stories, it appears this priest gave an interview 2 days before the event, acknowledging that it would cause “trouble.” This indicates that he acted with deliberate, premeditated defiance, and therefore shamefully.

This man’s spiritual state is clearly a genuine cause for sadness.

Blessings,

Gerry
 
What other doctrine does this priest want to through under the bus? Pope John Paul II in his encyclical Ordinatio Sacradotalis definitively stated, “Wherefore, in order that all doubt, dispute, and controversy may be removed regarding a matter of great importance and true significance, a matter which pertains to the Church’s divine constitution itself, in virtue of my ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) and as supreme pastor and teacher, with the authority of Jesus Christ and the Apostles Peter and Paul and my own authority, I declare, define, and pronounce that the Church has no authority or capacity or capability whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment, decision, and pronouncement is to be definitively, absolutely, and unquestionably held by all the Church’s faithful forever and ever and ever…”

Add Apostolic Tradition and the constant teaching of the Ordinary and Universal Magesterium…solid doctrine.

Iowa Mike
 
I have no personal problem with the concept of women priests, BUT dang it! NO means NO. The Vatican has put an end to the subject. What do these folks think they will accomplish? It’s not like they can get a pitition up & force the Pope to change the whole thing. Geeesssee. Eventually they might get the message & shut up.
 
I have no personal problem with the concept of women priests, BUT dang it! NO means NO. The Vatican has put an end to the subject. What do these folks think they will accomplish? It’s not like they can get a pitition up & force the Pope to change the whole thing. Geeesssee. Eventually they might get the message & shut up.
Darned if there aren’t two of us. Truth does not change…period. No one said that it is easy to be a Catholic but to be one, one must accept the doctrine of the Church…all of it…like it or not. Vatican I, Fides, Chapter 3 spells out what Catholics must believe. Cahtolics do not have the right to dissent from Church doctrine.

Iowa Mike
 
Darned if there aren’t two of us. Truth does not change…period. No one said that it is easy to be a Catholic but to be one, one must accept the doctrine of the Church…all of it…like it or not. Vatican I, Fides, Chapter 3 spells out what Catholics must believe. Cahtolics do not have the right to dissent from Church doctrine.

Iowa Mike
It’s not even open for debate. The matter is closed. It can never be opened for debate. They should quit waisting their breath and start being obedient to the Church.
 
Darned if there aren’t two of us. … Cahtolics do not have the right to dissent from Church doctrine…
I would hope Mike, that they would either come to their sences (I can’t spell wort a darn, was that right? :o ) or become Episcalpes.
 
Ok, I’ll say it. It’s nice to see the bishops stand up for something The Church teaches and say “no”.
I understand charitable correction but so many things have been let slide that the Catholic Church in some countries would be unrecognizable to those that gave their lives for it at the beginnnig
 
I’ll admit it; I believe in equal rights for women and minorities, but I can’t stomach the thought of “women priests” in the Catholic Church. If that should happen, I’ll transfer worship to the Anglican or Episcopal Church. (If they have women priests there, that’s fine with me. Not in the Catholic Church, though.)
 
I am not at all suprised that this is coming from a Maryknoll priest. I have never been impressed with Maryknoll as they have always seemed to water down the faith to be more politically correct or more ecumenical. It is one thing to disagree with the Church on this matter but one should not publicize it, especially being a priest.
 
poor man… i feel very sorry for him if he honestly did not understand that participating in a illicit “ordination” was not a serious wrong on his part.

whatever your personal beliefs about ordination of women may be,
  1. a priest has no authority to ordain, only a Bishop
  2. no Catholic can act in direct opposition to the Holy See as a Catholic
  3. That woman has a very warped concept of the Priesthood if she things she can “claim Catholic ordination” for herself…
 
He is in my prayers. I am reminded of a quote by St. Thomas Aquinas:

*“Anyone, upon whom the ecclesiastical authority, in ignorance of true facts, imposes a demand that offends his clear conscience, should perish in excommunication rather than violate his conscience.” *
 
I will pray for him as well.

Ave Maria, gratia plena. Dominus Tecum. Benedicta tu in mulieribus, et benedictus fructus ventris tui, Jesus. Sancta Maria, Mater Dei. Ora pro nobis peccatoribus, nunc, et in hora mortis nostrae. Amen

Gloria Patris et Filio et Spiritui Sancto. Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in saecula saeculorum. Amen
:highprayer:

Jacob :signofcross:
 
www.lifesitenews.com

US Priest has 30 Days to Recant Support for Women’s Ordination or face Excommunication: Vatican

By Hilary White

November 13, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Fr. Roy Bourgeois, a member of the Maryknoll missionary order, has told media that he has been given 30 days to recant his support for the ordination of women, or face excommunication. Bourgeois had preached a homily at the “ordination” of Janice Sevre-Duszynka in August, in Lexington, Kentucky.

Bourgeois, a long-time leftist political activist, said he received a letter October 21st from the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) giving him a “canonical warning” that his action in concelebrating a Mass and delivering a homily at an “ordination” ceremony of a woman at a Unitarian church earlier this year could result in his excommunication. The ceremony was staged by the radical feminist group Roman Catholic Womanpriests.

The letter tells Bourgeois to recant the “belief and public statements that support the ordination of women in our Church, or … be excommunicated,” according to the National Catholic Reporter. He has also been warned that his actions could result in his expulsion from his religious order. It is reported that this was the first time a Catholic priest in good standing with the Church had participated in a mock ordination.

Fr. Bourgeois responded in a letter saying that he believed that the Catholic Church’s teaching restricting clerical ordination to men is “wrong” and “does not stand up to scrutiny.” He quoted a 1976 report by the Pontifical Biblical Commission that said there was no biblical reason “for excluding women from the priesthood.”

“After much prayer, reflection and discernment, it is my conscience that compels me to do the right thing. I cannot recant my belief and public statements that support the ordination of women in our Church,” he wrote.

He went on to demand that “all Catholics, fellow priests, bishops, Pope Benedict XVI and all Church leaders at the Vatican … speak loudly on this grave injustice of excluding women from the priesthood.”

While the feminist movement of the late 20th century has created the concept that women are being “discriminated” against by an all-male priesthood, the Catholic Church has made it clear that the issue is not one of politics.

In 1976, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the highest doctrinal authority in the Church under the Pope, discussed the issue of the ordination of women and issued a Declaration on the Question of the Admission of Women to the Ministerial Priesthood which concluded that the Church “does not consider herself authorized to admit women to priestly ordination”.

Following this, in 1994, Pope John Paul II declared the question closed in his letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, stating formally, “Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance … I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church’s faithful.”

In 1995, the CDF issued a clarification calling the matter one of “definitive and infallible” doctrine and saying, “This doctrine belongs to the deposit of the faith of the Church.”

In recent years, a spate of mock “ordinations” have caught the attention of the media, with radical feminist, leftist activist and anti-Catholic organisations claiming to have created women priests. But lay critics of the ceremonies have called them crass political stunts meant to discredit the Catholic Church.

In May this year, the Vatican responded to the mock ordinations with a decree saying that any Catholic bishop who attempts the ordination of a woman or any woman who participates in such a ceremony, is subject to automatic excommunication.
 
I am reminded of this quote:

*“Anyone, upon whom the ecclesiastical authority, in ignorance of true facts, imposes a demand that offends his clear conscience, should perish in excommunication rather than violate his conscience.” *St. Thomas Aquinas
 
If you don’t want to play by the rules then you can’t be part of the team. If your personal rules weigh on you so much that you no longer in good conscience be part of the team, then turn in your uniform and please leave the stadium without further ado.

If you’d like to remain with the team, correct yourself immediately.

Those are your choices. In no case shall it be you telling the team to adhere to your rules which so clearly violate the team rules. Got it there, hero?

Button up or bug out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top