C
CatholicGeek1
Guest
I think for any senior official, you do not want to say, or shouldn’t say what you do not know. At this point we still do not know who did this. Was it foreign terrorism, domestic, was it just a crazy loon who doesn’t like taxes? We just don’t know yet.O’Reilly is critical in this not being called a terrorist attack, 2 bombs go off in the span of 15 seconds, BOR has a point in that regard, Fort Hood is workplace violence according to Obama as well and those deceased were denied. Though I don’t agree with Bill O’Reilly, tragedies seem more to be earth quakes and car accidents.
President Kennedy was assassinated, that was a tragedy but overall, it was an assassination. Tragedy would seem to be a bit of a mild way to describe that event. Ditto for Pearl Harbor. Do we think of it as an attack or a tragedy? 911? Do we just call it a great tragedy?
However, I think this soon after the event, I can see why Obama might call it that, “terrorist attack” is a strong term to use. But it might be the proper term to use.
If Michelle Bachmann, Sarah Palin or John McCain used the term “tragedy” to describe 911, that would seem a bit of a mild way to put it and Obama after all, is the commander in chief, leader of the US in this vein. A high number of people have been maimed along with some deaths, the poor people.