I
Okay, i guess I wasn’t clear. But at least it should be now.Actually, no, you didn’t clear it up. You never responded. Where were you catechized?
.
I’m not a hippe, I have short hair, no drugs no smoking no flower power. JUST JESUS. But that was funny.Fixed
![]()
Where else in the church. I don’t get where your going with that.Actually, no, you didn’t clear it up. You never responded. Where were you catechized?
.
Because you quoted a Pentecostal preacher, Smith Wigglesworth, as your authority in response to PRmerger’s contention that faith cannot be alone.Where else in the church. I don’t get where your going with that.
So, what did you mean here, when you said:PR?? I kept saying that.
Are you telling me, no Catholic should read anything from non-Catholic, but Christian publications?Because you quoted a Pentecostal preacher, Smith Wigglesworth, as your authority in response to PRmerger’s contention that faith cannot be alone.
You are the only practicing Catholic that I know who has quoted a Pentecostal preacher to back up his beliefs…
.
I guess PR, you got me. If you don’t want to take my explanation that believeing has to encompass all the rest that is needed then, I’M WRONG.So, what did you mean here, when you said:
“Only believing and being baptized brings salvation.”
???
Just kidding bro’I’m not a hippe, I have short hair, no drugs no smoking no flower power. JUST JESUS. But that was funny.![]()
No offence taken, That was funny, seriously. Taken in humor. I still want to know where you found the picture of that guy in the tye dye shirt. hilarious!Just kidding bro’![]()
Yeah. I think over many of the things I have said, and trust me I have a lot of things that I am going have to answer for.Are you telling me, no Catholic should read anything from non-Catholic, but Christian publications?
Like we as Catholics can’t learn anything from Smith Wigglesworth, John G. Lake, William J. Seymour, MARIA Woodworth-Etters, Oral Roberts, Kathryn Kulman, Aimee McPherson, etc etc.
Not that we can’t learn from Padre Pio, Mother Teresa, Father DeOrio, St Anthony. St Cupertino, St Aquinas, Pope John Paul II, St. Faustina, Saint Bernadette Soubirous, etc etc.
What a waste.
Sorry I won’t do that. If that makes me protestant, hindu, muslim, what ever you want to call me, go ahead. God knows me and His opinion matters to me.
That reminds me of the teaching in Luke 8:9Yeah. I think over many of the things I have said, and trust me I have a lot of things that I am going have to answer for.
I struggle with faith every day. Overwhelming sense of doubts. I have been told by a Calvinist that I am going to hell, cause of Hebrews 6:4-6. I am indeed guilty of what that verse says. No getting around that.
I do suffer from scrupulosity. Where I am often paralyzed in some kind of a fear. Yes, I do struggle.
I will say this though. I need to at some point trust. That is another big issue for me. Trust. I wonder if my confessions are right. I wonder if I pray correctly. I wonder if the Catholic Church is the true Church as it claims to be. I wonder, wonder and wonder.
I am tired of constantly doubting and wondering. It does prevent me from growing. I would suggest you do a class (I just finished one at my Parish in Jupiter) called Catholicism.
There is a new series on this and I am sure there is some church in your diocese that will doing this series. If you cannot do that, there is a DVD set. It is very very good. All of the questions we have, and doubts are explained.
Catholicism series Father Robert Barron. Look that up and if you get a chance I would consider purchasing that. Yes, this priest Father Robert Barron is truly ideal in the way he presents this series. He has a true unique manner in how he communicates the issues.
For me, it is essential that the Church is what she claims to be. That the sacrament of confession is real. That all of the sacraments are real. In todays world, I do not think I have ever known how under attack we are for our beliefs. It is hard enough with the molestations, and corruptions with money and the history of shameful acts.
Well, a few things about those things. One, I am a very shameful person myself. I am no saint, believe me. Also, Christ says this. “If a person keeps my commandments, then he is like a wise man that builds his house on a ROCK. That when the winds and floods come, the house shall remain. If a person does not put into practice what I say is like a fool that builds his house and unstable foundations. That when the winds and floods come, it shall be washed away.”
Couple that with the on going debate of gay marriage, and how many different “churches” are performing this in front of an alter. Thinking that God is approving of it. Again, these churches are not faithful. They do not hold fast to the traditional sacraments. Many of them speak out against the Church and call her the whore of babylon. Well, like Christ says, many of them are being washed away with the teachings of the world.
It is difficult to remain. I wonder if I will be able to persevere. I would suggest you grow in the faith that you proclaim to believe in. That way we can all remain steady.
11“Now the parable is this: the seed is the word of God. 12“Those beside the road are those who have heard; then the devil comes and takes away the word from their heart, so that they will not believe and be saved. 13“Those on the rocky soil are those who, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no firm root; they believe for a while, and in time of temptation fall away. 14“The seed which fell among the thorns, these are the ones who have heard, and as they go on their way they are choked with worries and riches and pleasures of this life, and bring no fruit to maturity. **15“But the seed in the good soil, these are the ones who have heard the word in an honest and good heart, and hold it fast, and bear fruit with perseverance**.
Not at all. It no more says that Jesus’ atoning death on the cross “wasn’t enough” than your doctrine does where you have to profess with your mouth that Jesus is your Lord and Savior.
It’s not “my” doctrine, the only doctrine I follow is the gospel of Jesus Christ, as laid out by His Word. Professing that Jesus is my Lord is a fruit or result of a changed heart, which has to come first and only comes from accepting God’s gift of grace through faith in what Jesus did at Calvary. A person who does that in faith, is not only forgiven of his sins, but also justified because Jesus was raised from the dead, thereby defeating death and sin once and for all. God gets all the glory and honor for saving me. There’s nothing I could ever do to add, earn, or repay that, past, present, or future. It is His work, and His work alone. The sin nature that I was a slave to is put to death, and replaced with a new nature born of the Holy Spirit. With that new spirit and with the Holy Spirit guiding, Jesus Christ lives in me and the good works that follow are fruit of that miraculous change. This fruit is physical evidence of that miracle of grace, not a cause or preservation of it. With the same way we received God’s grace through faith, we are to follow the Holy Spirit, through faith. The works that result after are just a physical manifestation of that faith.If your doctrine doesn’t say Jesus’ death is insufficient, neither does Trent.
From official Roman Catholic doctrine on justification.
Actually, this canon is specifically saying that justification by God’s grace is preserved and increased by our good works. It condemns or curses the notion that the works are a fruit of God’s grace. Grace by definition is unmerited favor. It is favor that we don’t deserve or earn. So if God’s grace is preserved or increased by our good works, then grace is no longer grace. It rather becomes payment for our good works. The result then is that the person will live his or her life always trying to be good enough to earn God’s grace, or else he’ll lose it. The burden of trying to live that kind of life will lead to either righteous pride in oneself or constant guilt from sinning.Canon 24.
If anyone says that the justice received is not preserved and also not increased before God through good works,[125] but that those works are merely the fruits and signs of justification obtained, but not the cause of its increase, let him be anathema. (Trent, session 6, chapter 16 and canon 24).
Amen!
So all this time you have NOT been arguing for Belief Alone (plus baptism)???![]()
No, fpesce.PR?? I kept saying that.
You have, it appears, rescinded this comment. I applaud you on this.Only believing and being baptized brings salvation.
God rules over all creation. Whilst theologians do their best, no one man can espouse the complete Divine Mind!What does it mean when He said we need to pick up OUR CROSSES?
What if you have faith to move mountains, but do not have love?
Read Mathew 25:31-46 and explain it. Please do not tell me it does not mean what it says.
When Jesus blessed are the merciful, explain merciful.
Did the good Samaritan know Christ? Did he serve Christ?
Does a person need to be consciously aware they are serving Christ, in order to serve Christ?
If so, then explain Mathew 25:37 for me.
Thanks
Well, flip, that’s exactly what we Catholic profess, too!It’s not “my” doctrine, the only doctrine I follow is the gospel of Jesus Christ, as laid out by His Word.
At what point did Cornelius accept God’s gift of grace through faith in what Jesus did at Calvary?Professing that Jesus is my Lord is a fruit or result of a changed heart, which has to come first and only comes from accepting God’s gift of grace through faith in what Jesus did at Calvary
Amen! And the fact that we baptize infants, who have done nothing to add, earn or repay the atoning death on Calvary limns this doctrine quite nicely.There’s nothing I could ever do to add, earn, or repay that, past, present, or future. It is His work, and His work alone.
Amen! This is very Catholic of you to say!The sin nature that I was a slave to is put to death, and replaced with a new nature born of the Holy Spirit. With that new spirit and with the Holy Spirit guiding, Jesus Christ lives in me and the good works that follow are fruit of that miraculous change.
Amen!This fruit is physical evidence of that miracle of grace, not a cause or preservation of it. With the same way we received God’s grace through faith, we are to follow the Holy Spirit, through faith. The works that result after are just a physical manifestation of that faith.
True, dat.Actually, this canon is specifically saying that justification by God’s grace is preserved and increased by our good works.
Where?It condemns or curses the notion that the works are a fruit of God’s grace.
I think the fact that we baptize infants proclaims that we don’t believe what you are professing Trent says.Grace by definition is unmerited favor. It is favor that we don’t deserve or earn. So if God’s grace is preserved or increased by our good works, then grace is no longer grace. It rather becomes payment for our good works.
That’s why Catholics don’t profess that God’s grace is earned by our good works.The result then is that the person will live his or her life always trying to be good enough to earn God’s grace, or else he’ll lose it. The burden of trying to live that kind of life will lead to either righteous pride in oneself or constant guilt from sinning.
Same way all the believers in the Old Testament were justified, by God’s grace through faith. Abraham believed and it was credited to him as righteousness. It was Abraham’s faith in God and His promise that God would make him a great nation. So when God tested Abraham to sacrifice his son Isaac, Abraham still trusted God and His promise even though God just told him a seemingly contradictory command in sacrificing Isaac. His actions resulted from his faith(trust). Throughout the Old Testament and the New Testament, it is God’s grace through faith. Now that we’re in the New Testament, that figure of perfect faith and sacrifice is Jesus Christ. Everything in the Old Testament, New Testament, history points to what Jesus did at Calvary. That’s the central corner stone.At what point did Cornelius accept God’s gift of grace through faith in what Jesus did at Calvary?
So if the infant perishes without being baptized, does that infant go to hell? If so, so it’s a work then that conveys grace?Amen! And the fact that we baptize infants, who have done nothing to add, earn or repay the atoning death on Calvary limns this doctrine quite nicely.
If anyone says that the justice received is not preserved and also not increased before God through good works,[125] but that those works are merely the fruits and signs of justification obtained(cross at calvary), but not the cause of its increase, let him be anathema. (Trent, session 6, chapter 16 and canon 24).Where?
Since babies are not aware of their own actions, it is God’s mercy that is given upon them by God himself. Do you know how many babies/infants/toddlers die daily globally without being water baptized?Or are you wanting to maintain that babies, when they are baptized and infused with sanctifying grace, have done some good work to earn this grace?
If you believe in canon 24 as stated above, it says you have to preserve and increase grace by works. Therefore, you are earning grace. Grace is no longer grace if it’s earned.That’s why Catholics don’t profess that God’s grace is earned by our good works.