Favor factory? Huma emails ...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Theo520
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
dvdjs said:
  1. Sadly Vince and Killery come up from time to time ffrom forum regulars.
  2. What etics violations or criminal charges have been filed against these subordinates?
  3. One could take your words to me and that Trump is responsible for what his team did. And that one could say Trump rather than Trump subordinates when speaking of, for example, collusion. You might like to know that that substitution has been objected to more than once on this forum
Click to expand...
Yes, trump is responsible for what his team does. When they aren’t working out, at least he has the common sense to switch them out. I never saw this with Obama. Best example being how Sebilius showed gross incompetence in the ACA rollout, yet she stayed in charge for the duration, after repeated missed schedules and going vastly over cost projections. Only mentioning as an illustrative point, not to deflect.
 
Theo520 said:
Please stop trying to delfect the discussion (introducing Vince shows severe desperation).

So what you are saying is that the person in charge shouldn’t held accountable for what their immediate subordinates do, unless you can find the paper trail of explicit instructions.

I think whom you hire and what they accomplish is a direct reflection on the manager.
The ‘ethical’ actions of her team reflect directly upon Hillary, it’s why I’m glad she didn’t win.
I will always remain amazed and why the DNC ever supported her as a POTUS candidate.
Click to expand...
If they didn’t have her express authority/permission/approval, why weren’t those aides fired???
 
Monte_RCMS said:
A lot of people seem to have dismissed the email scandals [and the private **server
Click to expand...
… not a private email address] … figured to dismiss the issue as political campaign rhetoric.

I think a lot of people don’t simply don’t spend much time thinking about the Clintons.
 
ThinkingSapien said:
I think a lot of people don’t simply don’t spend much time thinking about the Clintons.
Click to expand...
Oh, I see nothing but gossip and potential occasion of sin with all the harping on the Clintons on here. Same people who demanded we LOCK HER UP and have another BENGHAZI hearing cannot deal with the fact their guy’s AG is the one who doesn’t spend much time on all the gossip.

Substitute “Clinton” with “Kardashian,” and it’s utterly embarrassing. I’d be hanging my head in shame if I were so preoccupied with gossip and conspiracy theory.
 
randomuser said:
Oh, I see nothing but gossip and potential occasion of sin with all the harping on the Clintons on here. Same people who demanded we LOCK HER UP and have another BENGHAZI hearing cannot deal with the fact their guy’s AG is the one who doesn’t spend much time on all the gossip.

Substitute “Clinton” with “Kardashian,” and it’s utterly embarrassing. I’d be hanging my head in shame if I were so preoccupied with gossip and conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...
Oh, most righteous one, do you feel the same about the Russia/Trump collusion, wherein there is no crime and evidence for said crime?
 
josie_L said:
Oh, most righteous one, do you feel the same about the Russia/Trump collusion, wherein there is no crime and evidence for said crime?
Click to expand...
There is an active investigation of Trump in 2017.

There is no active investigation of the other two subjects.

Facts matter.
 
randomuser said:
Oh, I see nothing but gossip and potential occasion of sin with all the harping on the Clintons on here. Same people who demanded we LOCK HER UP and have another BENGHAZI hearing cannot deal with the fact their guy’s AG is the one who doesn’t spend much time on all the gossip.

Substitute “Clinton” with “Kardashian,” and it’s utterly embarrassing. I’d be hanging my head in shame if I were so preoccupied with gossip and conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you are gossiping about people on this forum theoretically gossiping. :rolleyes: I don’t think you know what gossiping means, man.

I recently saw a TV show/documentary about the police detectives who catch child predators and users of child pornography. They set up, caught, and arrested a guy and one of the detectives mentioned how they were lucky when they showed up at his apartment door that he didn’t run and smash his computer or throw it out the window. Because apparently that is a common issue the police face, where the criminal smashes as much computer hardware as they can in an effort to get rid of the evidence before the police bust the door down and arrest them. I am sure the evidence these guys are trying to get rid of is simply embarrassing pictures of their dog’s birthday party. Just as I am pretty sure that Hillary Clinton and her staff just wanted to make sure no one knew that see was a rabid user of Paula Dean’s recipes. And who can charge someone for that?
 
josie_L said:
If I use the word authorization I essentially mean with her permission and/or approval, the fact of the matter is she had to have had some say/stance regarding the destruction of those phones, do you really think that those aides did it independently and without her approval?

You are grasping at straws, and trying to impugn my honor because you have nothing left to defend her with except my “misuse” of the word “authority”.

Moreover, I am not a lawyer trying to win a case, I am person with the GOD-GIVEN faculties to realize that people don’t destroy government property without there being a reason to and/or without the express permission/authority/approval from the people whom they work for, especially since such actions cannot be undertaken independently.

The matter was not investigated, it was prevented from being thoroughly investigated by the likes of LYNCH and COMEY and OBAMA. And, by the way, here’s a nice juicy tidbit that was just discovered from a FOIA request regarding the LYNCH/BILL CLINTON tarmac meeting:
Click to expand...
👍👍👍
 
FirstFiveEighth said:
Perhaps you are gossiping about people on this forum theoretically gossiping. :rolleyes: I don’t think you know what gossiping means, man.

I recently saw a TV show/documentary about the police detectives who catch child predators and users of child pornography. They set up, caught, and arrested a guy and one of the detectives mentioned how they were lucky when they showed up at his apartment door that he didn’t run and smash his computer or throw it out the window. Because apparently that is a common issue the police face, where the criminal smashes as much computer hardware as they can in an effort to get rid of the evidence before the police bust the door down and arrest them. I am sure the evidence these guys are trying to get rid of is simply embarrassing pictures of their dog’s birthday party. Just as I am pretty sure that Hillary Clinton and her staff just wanted to make sure no one knew that see was a rabid user of Paula Dean’s recipes. And who can charge someone for that?
Click to expand...
If nothing else ,just the mere fact that HC thought for even a second that lame excuse would fly is more telling of how she regards her constituents,than anything else.
 
Theo520 said:
Please stop trying to delfect the discussion (introducing Vince shows severe desperation).

So what you are saying is that the person in charge shouldn’t held accountable for what their immediate subordinates do, unless you can find the paper trail of explicit instructions.

I think whom you hire and what they accomplish is a direct reflection on the manager.
The ‘ethical’ actions of her team reflect directly upon Hillary, it’s why I’m glad she didn’t win.
I will always remain amazed and why the DNC ever supported her as a POTUS candidate.
Click to expand...
+1
 
randomuser said:
Oh, I see nothing but gossip and potential occasion of sin with all the harping on the Clintons on here. Same people who demanded we LOCK HER UP and have another BENGHAZI hearing cannot deal with the fact their guy’s AG is the one who doesn’t spend much time on all the gossip…
Click to expand...
You’ve lost me. I’m not sure what you are trying to communicate.
 
randomuser said:
Oh, I see nothing but gossip and potential occasion of sin with all the harping on the Clintons on here. Same people who demanded we LOCK HER UP and have another BENGHAZI hearing cannot deal with the fact their guy’s AG is the one who doesn’t spend much time on all the gossip.

Substitute “Clinton” with “Kardashian,” and it’s utterly embarrassing. I’d be hanging my head in shame if I were so preoccupied with gossip and conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...
Of course you would.
 
randomuser said:
There is an active investigation of Trump in 2017.

There is no active investigation of the other two subjects.

Facts matter.
Click to expand...
Yes, facts matter, like the fact that Hillary used a private server, risked the security of the nation, destroyed government property (30 000 emails, phones), used bleach bit, . . .etc.

Then there is the lack of transcripts and/or audio and video files of the meeting that took place between Comey, FBI director, Cheryl Mills, the chief of Counsel for Hillary Clinton, but who was also Chief of Staff and under investigation with Clinton, and Clinton, herself.

Or how about the 30 minute meeting between DOJ, Lynch, with Bill Clinton, while Hillary was being investigated. . . .etc. These are facts not gossip.

And if you say that facts matter, watch this video as the House Judiciary committee just voted to adopt a SPECIAL COUNSEL on Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Barrack Obama, and Susan Rice.

youtube.com/watch?v=fI6rhc2ilzw

Enjoy!
 
randomuser said:
There is an active investigation of Trump in 2017.

There is no active investigation of the other two subjects.

Facts matter.
Click to expand...
So you won’t be saying anything about the investigation until the facts are out, right, because to assume Trump’s guilt would be gossip??
 
josie_L said:
So you won’t be saying anything about the investigation until the facts are out, right, because to assume Trump’s guilt would be gossip??
Click to expand...
It is fair to say that there is an active investigation of Trump. Not gossip at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top