Feds seek dismissal of Belmont Abbey College’s anti-HHS suit [CNA]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CNA_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually the Supreme Court will be hearing arguments about why it should hear the arguments.
From what I understand they are hearing 5 hours worth of oral arguments on several different issues. One of them is that. Something about some Act that may or may not apply. And if I recall, the Feds said it didn’t in the lower courts and have just switched their position. 🤷

All I know is…I’m glad I’m not a Supreme Court Judge
 
From what I understand they are hearing 5 hours worth of oral arguments on several different issues. One of them is that. Something about some Act that may or may not apply. And if I recall, the Feds said it didn’t in the lower courts and have just switched their position. 🤷

All I know is…I’m glad I’m not a Supreme Court Judge
One of the disputes was whether it was a tax during the debate they said it was not, now they sat it is.
 
All I know is…I’m glad I’m not a Supreme Court Judge
LOL. I’d also hate to be a lawyer who prepares and spends 5 hours arguing in front of the Court only to have them turn around and say the timing isn’t right and to refile in a year.
 
One of the disputes was whether it was a tax during the debate they said it was not, now they sat it is.
It’s because they will lose if they use the Commerce Clause to force people not engaged in interstate commerce to buy a product and fine them if they do not buy said product. The taxing authority of the federal government has a better chance of winning.

However, it’s still unconstitutional to force a citizen to buy a product, to force a company to give a product away for free, and it’s unconstitutional to force a religious organization to violate it’s conscience. A triple play!
 
Of course the feds are doing this. The feds are led by Obama after all. I hope that the suit does not get dismissed. In fact, I hope that the suit succeeds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top