There’s the illogic, Brendan.
If X church = 6,
and Y church = 0
therefore hypothesis Z exists in church X and not in church Y.
i.e., leaving out of the picture God’s election and call, and other factors that may be causative. It is illogical in my opinion to assume that Z hypothesis is the very reason for zero in church Y.
I have no problem if you want to believe that, Brendan,.
Here is my premise
X Chuch =6
X Church = male altar servers
Y Church =0
Y Church = female altar servers
Factors X,Y, Z exists in X Church and is the cause of both factors. In otherwords, the existance of X,Y and Z is causitive for both the vocations AND causitive for the altar boys.
You seem to be operating under the impression that a single cause cannot produce two results. That is untrue.
So one more time here…
I am NOT claming that all male altar boys necessaruily produce large numbers of vocations. I know from direct data that it untrue.
What I am claiming is that the very factors that produce large numbers of vocations will also encorage all male altarboys.
You might find it illogical, but it should be easy to refute. Simply produce a single case where either
Factors X, Y, Z are present, Seminarian >=4 and altar girls are present
or
Factors, U V W are present , Seminarians >=4 and altar girls are present.
Simple and easy to refute; ll you need to prove me wrong is 1 parish anywhere that has 4 or more seminarians and uses altar girls.
Call your vocations director, they will know if such a parish exists in your diocese. ( and that is true for anyone supporting Joy’s position).
It is the “other factors that may be causative” (as you put it) that CAUSE both results.