Worship is a moral obligation.
True, but irrelevant to the point. My statement was not about what is, but rather about WHY it is what it is. Moral obligations are moral obligations for a reason.
Worship is honoring God, which is a moral obligation for the created being. You are right that God is lacking in nothing. But moral duties do not exist to fulfill the needs of man.
Moral obligations do exist to fulfill what man needs. They exist to help him grow. Yes, God is complete, and His completeness also implies the fact that He has supreme will, since He exhibits consistent character.
Such a morality would be humanism, not the Christian concept of morals. Morality, which flows from God’s essence, does require us to honor Him.
God is moral by His will, and His choice, not only by nature. It if were otherwise, He would not be God.
The fact that He provides moral laws for us to aspire to and grow to is not humanism, it is the essence of the Christian concept of morals, because, unlike God, we do not have supreme will, and hence we will falter at times and thus require forgiveness.
Worship of God is a moral obligation because it is a signpost for growth, not because it is simply a “law of nature.”
In Matthew 4:10 Jesus says ‘for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve’. The purpose of Worship is to fulfill our duty.
No. The purpose of worship is to grow us as individuals, which is accomplished via fulfilling our duty.
Duty and discipline are tools of growth - not ends to themselves. If used as ends to themselves, then you’ve made everything meaningless.
God did not bless Abraham because he was dutiful to God. He blessed him because Abraham had so grown through his trials that he now understood a higher form of love and faith. Read Genesis 22. This is not a story just about duty. This is a story of “Do you love me enough to do for me what I will do for you?”
It is true that in fulfilling our duty we will be rightly oriented toward God and from that will come blessings (not blessing from a worldly point of view but from a Heavenly). But the blessings are not the goal.
I agree that the blessings are not the goal. The goal is growth of the individual. The goal is growth of the will to be more like the example God has set for us, to be a better being than we are today.
The point is not duty, the point is not discipline. The point is to be able to use duty and discipline when you need to in order to be a better person.
Duty and discipline are not the goal.
Are you saying heart is the key to meaning? And are you saying that heart is feelings we experience?
I am saying it is A key. God has said to love him with all our heart, all our strength, all our spirit and all our mind. So understanding, emotion, will - these are all important. Mindless duty is only a tool, not an ends. (We can all name cases of mindless duty - but I don’t want to name it and fall into Godwin’s Law.)
God loved David in large part because he was a man after God’s own heart. Was David perfect? No, but he was motivated, his life had meaning. He was more than just dutiful.
If so might I suggest a Dr. Peter Kreeft article I just happened to read the other day. In it he points out:
The Importance of Free Choice: The Role of Our Will
If heart is what you mean then I think you might be importing modern romantic notions of heart into the meaning of heart as used in Sacred Scripture.
I think you are misunderstanding what I said. Heart is important but is only a piece - but it is a piece. I’m not bringing in a romantic notion.
Its a long time ago now, but a thesis I wrote on free will was about will (ours) and its nature in relation to God (His). Glancing at the concept written about Kreeft, it is in line with I wrote. Do not get confused - heart is not a synonym for will. While they each describe self, they describe varying aspects of self - otherwise the commandment would not need to be so explicit.