Fired teacher suing diocese

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trader
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Trader

Guest
fortwayne.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20120425/NEWS/320119439/-1/TOPNEWS

The lawsuit was filed after the EEOC found our diocese guilty of sex discrimination and violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Under the ADA infertility is considered a disability. Interestingly enough, the HHS mandate requires insurance coverage to prevent pregnacy, but not to treat infertility.

The Catholic Church has no problem with treating infertility by moral means and even paid for the teacher’s in vitro fertility treatments from their self funded insurance plan. I have known Msgr Kuzmich since 1984 when he was rector of my current parish and during the summer I attend mass at his current parish. I am absolutely certain he is misquoted in the article.

Is this still another case of the federal government telling religious schools that they must act against their own teachings? I think so. The central issue is that the Church has both the right and the duty not to hire people who act against our moral teachings in a public way.
 
She wasn’t fired because she is a woman or because she is infertile, so where is the sex or disability discrimination? 🤷
 
I would appreicate if a legal expert could chime in and explain how and/or if this case is similar to the 9-0 Supreme Court decision from earlier this year ( Hosanna-Tabor ruling).
 
This is just a run-of-the-mill firing for not following Catholic teaching.

And, actually, having a contract not renewed for a school teacher isn’t really a firing, is it? That’s why you get a new contract every year - the old one has been fulfilled.
 
Many years ago, another teacher at that same school and her husband had difficulty in conceiving a child. They treated the condition with a pilgrimage to a shrine in Ohio. It worked pretty well because their sixth daughter is my god-daughter.😃

I am also awaiting a reply from my brother who is a diocesan school board member in another state. I am pretty sure this situation is covered by the standard teacher contract.
 
garn9173 said:
I would appreicate if a legal expert could chime in and explain how and/or if this case is similar to the 9-0 Supreme Court decision from earlier this year ( Hosanna-Tabor ruling).
Click to expand...
I won’t claim to be a legal expert, but as a legal amateur: the significant difference that the EEOC is claiming is that the woman involved is not a minister. Hosanna-Tabor found that churches are immune to lawsuits over hiring and firing ministers. However, this doesn’t apply to non-ministers: so a church couldn’t fire a janitor for being black and then claim that they’re exempt as a religious institution.

If the plaintiff really is just a language arts teacher, with no ministerial duties, then the finding of Hosanna-Tabor would not apply, and the diocese would still be (potentially) liable.
 
Aelred_Minor said:
She wasn’t fired because she is a woman or because she is infertile, so where is the sex or disability discrimination? 🤷
Click to expand...
From the article:
“Defendants similarly employ male teachers … who have received medical treatments or procedures, including vasectomies, which effect or alter their fertility,” according to the lawsuit. “Defendants employ male teachers … who use contraceptives … who have received fertility treatment or their spouses have received fertility treatments.”
Click to expand...
They better get their act together. If they’re going to hold one teacher accountable to a morality clause then they had better hold them all to the same standards.

If the diocese didn’t add a ‘morality clause’ to her contract, they’ll probably lose this case. She’s not Catholic and was not required to complete any training in Catholic teachings.
 
Jim_Dandy said:
This is shocking, if true. The Catholic Church teaches that IVF is a mortal sin, a violation of the Natural Law. Why would any Catholic institution pay for it?
Click to expand...
I found it shocking also. My best guess at this point is that diocese did not know exactly what it was paying for. They got a bill from one of their insured employees and they paid it. I know some of the parties involved pretty well and there is now way Msgr Kuzmich or Bishop Rhoades would have approved it.
 
Rence said:
From the article:

They better get their act together. If they’re going to hold one teacher accountable to a morality clause then they had better hold them all to the same standards.

If the diocese didn’t add a ‘morality clause’ to her contract, they’ll probably lose this case. She’s not Catholic and was not required to complete any training in Catholic teachings.
Click to expand...
I agree all should be held to the same standard, but for most of the others, the school would have no way of knowing who does or does not practice contraception. Not all fertility treatments are immoral. If this teacher had not asked for time off for a second round of IVF, she may never have been found out.

I am pretty sure, but not positive, that a morality clause is part of the standard contract. In my old diocese where my brother is a board member, teachers are specifically prohibited from publicly criticizing the bishop, pastor, or principal. I personally know of cases where teachers were fired for marrying outside the Church.
 
Eleve said:
I won’t claim to be a legal expert, but as a legal amateur: the significant difference that the EEOC is claiming is that the woman involved is not a minister. Hosanna-Tabor found that churches are immune to lawsuits over hiring and firing ministers. However, this doesn’t apply to non-ministers: so a church couldn’t fire a janitor for being black and then claim that they’re exempt as a religious institution.

If the plaintiff really is just a language arts teacher, with no ministerial duties, then the finding of Hosanna-Tabor would not apply, and the diocese would still be (potentially) liable.
Click to expand...
THe Tabor Hosanna case was about a teacher. The school claimed rightly that, regardless of the subjects taught, she was a minister. My daughter is a Lutheran school teacher, and she is referred to as a minister, part of the ministry team, though not to be confused with an ordained pastor.

I don’t know the facts of this case, but it seems quite similar to Tabor Hasaqnna, at least on first blush.
 
My brother, who is on the school board of a large diocese in Illinois just told me that in his diocese there are five standard contracts, but the individual parish does not have to use any of them.

You might want to make inquiries in your own parish or diocese about a standard morality clause for church employees, unless you want to budget for a lot more legal fees in the future. Don’t panic yet, but we Catholics are definitely under attack from many sides.

Also, he also mentioned that the USCCB has recently recommended that all Catholic high schools include 8 semesters of religion classes. My old high school is objecting to that. They already had that back in the '60’s when I graduated, but they just hate being told what to do. The Benedictines operate the school independent of the diocese and love to say their tuition is lower than the diocesan high schools.
 
JonNC said:
THe Tabor Hosanna case was about a teacher. The school claimed rightly that, regardless of the subjects taught, she was a minister. My daughter is a Lutheran school teacher, and she is referred to as a minister, part of the ministry team, though not to be confused with an ordained pastor.

I don’t know the facts of this case, but it seems quite similar to Tabor Hasaqnna, at least on first blush.
Click to expand...
I don’t think this new case is similar to Tabor-Hosanna. In that case. the teacher led prayer and devotional services, taught religion, and was officially a “called teacher” who was commissioned as a lay minister. I think that was a very different situation than in this new case.
catholicnewsagency.com/news/hosanna-tabor-ruling-could-impact-future-religious-liberty-cases/
 
Rence said:
From the article:
They better get their act together. If they’re going to hold one teacher accountable to a morality clause then they had better hold them all to the same standards.

If the diocese didn’t add a ‘morality clause’ to her contract, they’ll probably lose this case. She’s not Catholic and was not required to complete any training in Catholic teachings.
Click to expand...
But will a morality clause hold up if no attempt is made by the employer to inform the teacher about morality requirements? The teacher told her supervisor that she would get in vitro fertilization. A year later, she told her principal she needed time off for in vitro fertilization. And only after a second year, and a second round of in vitro, was she called to account.
 
Trader said:
I found it shocking also. My best guess at this point is that diocese did not know exactly what it was paying for. They got a bill from one of their insured employees and they paid it. I know some of the parties involved pretty well and there is now way Msgr Kuzmich or Bishop Rhoades would have approved it.
Click to expand...
In the article they kept referring to it as fertility treatments and no IVF.
 
Dale_M said:
I don’t think this new case is similar to Tabor-Hosanna. In that case. the teacher led prayer and devotional services, taught religion, and was officially a “called teacher” who was commissioned as a lay minister. I think that was a very different situation than in this new case.
catholicnewsagency.com/news/hosanna-tabor-ruling-could-impact-future-religious-liberty-cases/
Click to expand...
You may be right, Dale. However, I think it a fair claim that if you work in a Catholic school (or a Lutheran one) as a teacher, you are in an undeniable way involved in the teaching of the faith.

Then again, I’m not sure how the CC views its lay school teachers.

Jon
 
INDIANAPOLIS – An Indiana teacher who says she was fired from a Roman Catholic school for using in vitro fertilization to try to get pregnant is suing in a case that could set up a legal showdown over reproductive and religious rights.
Emily Herx’s lawsuit accuses the Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend and St. Vincent de Paul school in Fort Wayne of discrimination for her firing last June. Herx, 31, of Hoagland, Ind., says that the church pastor told her she was a “grave, immoral sinner” and that a scandal would erupt if anyone learned she had undergone in vitro fertilization, or IVF.
Click to expand...
The Roman Catholic Church shuns IVF, which involves mixing egg and sperm in a laboratory dish and transferring a resulting embryo into the womb. Herx said she was fired despite exemplary performance reviews in her eight years as a language arts teacher.
Click to expand...
 
If she had a morals clause in her contract, as most Catholic school teachers do, she is going to have an uphill battle with this.
 
You should not teach at a Catholic school if you are going to disobey the teachings of the faith of that school. It sends the wrong message to students, the teachers themselves etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top