V
vocatio
Guest
Thank you. I told my wife this long ago. The Orthodox have long ruled the previous/replaced forum. I for one am insulted by references to the body of Christ in the host as a wafer.
What is the trick to explaining an answer without proselytizing?You can maintain zeal for your faith and still drop the proselytization.
Peace.
I think thats because there is clear difference between evangelism, proselytization, polemics and inflamitory sarcasm.The statement of purpose says that this forum is for Latin Catholics to learn about Eastern Catholicism and any posts by non-Catholics must be in compliance with that purpose. No matter how true I think Orthodoxy is, posting pro-Orthodox materials seems to be against the stated purpose of the forum. I can’t see it going over well with the management.![]()
Again I will ask, how can any answer by us not be construed as proselytizing or evangelism? Please show me how this is accomplished.I think thats because there is clear difference between evangelism, proselytization, polemics and inflamitory sarcasm.
One can always focus on whats in their heart.
We still share much in common, more than enough to talk about in a peaceful manner.
Peace.
Compassion, respect and humility.What is the trick to explaining an answer without proselytizing?
ya know what man, I was using that distinction for your sake. I call myself Catholic, plain and simple.All those of you who are insulted by the term Roman Catholic when we Orthodox Catholics use it want to set this guy straight?
Orthodoc
So, how do we answer questions like: What is you belief in lets say, the Great Schism? Would you only allow your side and not ours? And if so how could one effectively answer this question? Or, do we answer in a way that you would not disagree. And how would that lend to the growth of knowledge?Compassion, respect and humility.
Peace.
Michelle Arnold puts it very well here:Again I will ask, how can any answer by us not be construed as proselytizing or evangelism? Please show me how this is accomplished.
Technically speaking, proselytism and evangelism are synonyms for the act of advocating for one’s own cause and seeking to bring others to belief in that cause. In recent decades though, and in religious parlance, some have used the term proselytism to refer to “hard sell” techniques for gaining converts that often are disrespectful of the conscience, human dignity, and personal convictions of the person who is being proselytized, while evangelism is used is refer to respectful means of witnessing to one’s own faith while respecting those who are being evangelized.
If the more recent distinction between the two terms is recognized, then Catholics are called to evangelism and not to proselytism.
Maybe the Great Schism should be a thread in the Apologetics forums.So, how do we answer questions like: What is you belief in lets say, the Great Schism? Would you only allow your side and not ours? And if so how could one effectively answer this question? Or, do we answer in a way that you would not disagree. And how would that lend to the growth of knowledge?
This still hasnt shown me how this can be accomplished without 1. me leaving this site once and for all (Im sure most would be gladdened by this move) or 2. I tow the line and become a puppet and go along to get along. God I dont think I could ever live with myself taking the latter course. As to the former, my only guess is that it is what most if not all would want me to do.Michelle Arnold puts it very well here:
forums.catholic-questions.org/showpost.php?p=2921049&postcount=2
Next it will be asked of Catholic Answers to please take down the tracts on Orthodoxy. Guys, I don’t want to act like a brother who says ‘This is mine not yours!’, but this is indeed a Roman Catholic site! I LOVE the fact that you guys are here and share with us your beliefs, but it is here to help Roman Catholics understand theirs and others faiths, and also non-Roman Catholics to learn about Roman Catholics.Thank you. I told my wife this long ago. The Orthodox have long ruled the previous/replaced forum. I for one am insulted by references to the body of Christ in the host as a wafer.
That sounds like a great solution.Maybe the Great Schism should be a thread in the Apologetics forums.
That maybe but the Eastern Christian forum had the advantage of concentrating Eastern Thought and Theology in one forum where you wouldnt have to go searching here or there on different forums to get a collective idea of it. It was all in one place. And easier to deal with. Now, that is all gone. It will be scattered and to some that is the point.Maybe the Great Schism should be a thread in the Apologetics forums.
Sure I would give you my side and hear yours humbly and honestly. Yet I would not give you mine in a prideful attempt to convert you or prove you wrong. I would leave any epiphany gained up to the working of the Holy Spirit. I think what has been seen to much of are people taking offense at the lack of charity and resepct which is in proselytization and not ecumenical evangelization. This tact only leads us further appart, not closer.So, how do we answer questions like: What is you belief in lets say, the Great Schism? Would you only allow your side and not ours? And if so how could one effectively answer this question? Or, do we answer in a way that you would not disagree. And how would that lend to the growth of knowledge?
Wow! You sound like me. Catholic, Orthodox, Jewish family.It’s an issue for me, since my family is mostly RC with quite a sizeable contingent of Orthodox. (Jews, too, but that’s a topic for another column.)
Don’t leave hastily because there is a change. Give it a chance and see what happens.This still hasnt shown me how this can be accomplished without 1. me leaving this site once and for all (Im sure most would be gladdened by this move) or 2. I tow the line and become a puppet and go along to get along. God I dont think I could ever live with myself taking the latter course. As to the former, my only guess is that it is what most if not all would want me to do.