C
Contarini
Guest
Note that I specifically said “acknowledging . . . as a source of freedom.” Christians living under persecuting tyrants are still to pray for them.I think, rather, that it is appropriate to recognize that the American state, and the guarantors of its continued existence, both individuals and institutions, provide an opportunity to exercise, as you will, that Christian freedom. And the same is true in any other polity where that is, and remains, possible.
Who do you see acknowledging the American state, in a liturgical sense? Other, of course, than praying for the President and governor, as I assume you do.
GKC
I think a good rule of thumb is: if we would be bothered by Christians living under Hitler doing it, then we shouldn’t do it. Not because the U.S. or Britain is morally equivalent to Hitler’s Germany, but because the moral and spiritual value of a particular regime is only incidental to Christians’ theological attitude toward the state.
Granted, I might feel squeamish even about praying for Hitler liturgically without explicitly asking God to grant him repentance and conversion. But then, perhaps that wouldn’t be a bad general principle: however much you may admire the leaders of your country, ask God to turn them away from the evil by which (as sinful human beings in a position of power) they are always going to be tempted.
And yes, I’m aware that on this point (and no doubt on many others
Edwin