P
ProVobis
Guest
As Donald should be for Judge Curiel not throwing him in jail for contempt of court.Hillary should be counting her stars
As Donald should be for Judge Curiel not throwing him in jail for contempt of court.Hillary should be counting her stars
Perhaps you’re right. We may need to see more of a pattern before we make an opinion.I think you are seeing something that is not there.
Pot meet kettle.marybobo:![]()
Perhaps. Although “mess around” or “muck around” are probably far more common. Given the overtones, it was an intriguing choice of words.Plenty of people use the phrase “monkey it up” without any connotation to race
So many who are posting on this thread with such incredulity that the words could be taken as having racial overtones, also have taken great liberty in putting a very negative spin on the the words of politicians that they oppose. What a surprise!
Why should he be thrown in jail for pointing out a potential source of bias?HarryStotle:![]()
As Donald should be for Judge Curiel not throwing him in jail for contempt of court.Hillary should be counting her stars
Let them pull in as much rope as they want. It’ll take a lot of rope to hang that overfed donkey.over the last year has Dems pretty freaked out and they’re reaching for anything…anything to try to stem the tide
He was never in contempt of court. A person is in contempt only when he disobeys a court order directly or exhibits personal contempt for the judge in the judge’s presence and in open court.As Donald should be for Judge Curiel not throwing him in jail for contempt of court.
Well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle, so did I!There also is a little game popular with kids called Barrel of Monkeys. The monkeys come in a barrel and you take them out and see how many you can hang onto the tails.
I loved the old tv show the Monkees when I was a teenager.
Sure. But that has nothing to do with the Democratic Party, or the Republican Party, today.And Dredd Scott, and Jim Crow, and the KKK, and interment of Americans of Japanese origin, and the Trail of Tears.
I think it does. I think identity politics and intersectionality are as racist and toxic to our nation as any previous racist practices.Sure. But that has nothing to do with the Democratic Party, or the Republican Party, today.
It remains the party of racismIt’s just wordplay to try and sneak in the idea that the Democratic Party is the party of racism.
What can I say, I think you’re beyond wrong, that this is a fundamental difference between you and me.I think it does. I think identity politics and intersectionality are as racist and toxic to our nation as any previous racist practices.
Identity politics, regardless of its source, white supremacists or intersectionality proponents, is evil. And right now, most of it still comes from progressive Democrats.
I flagged this post as inappropriate because I find it highly racist. Which race are you comparing to a dog I wonder?https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/29/politics/ron-desantis-andrew-gillum-attack/index.html
A good example of dog-whistle campaigning.
That’s ridiculous, and you know it. Leaf’s post didn’t compare anyone to a dog.I flagged this post as inappropriate because I find it highly racist. Which race are you comparing to a dog I wonder?
In case you are accusing me, I invite you to read my posts on this thread.Pot meet kettle.
Perhaps.What can I say, I think you’re beyond wrong, that this is a fundamental difference between you and me.
I didn’t say any of this is racist what I said is that identity politics, regardless of source, is racist. What said is that intersectionality is racist. I stand by those statements.I do not believe that any mention of race, any acknowledgement of past racism, any effort to redress the wrongs of the past, any acknowledgement that there is still systemic racism in this country, and that many, many people are disadvantaged because of that systemic racism, is itself racism.
If I started an organization called write lives matter, it would rightfully be regarded as racist. The same applies to BLM.I don’t think Black Lives Matter is a racist movement (although I’m sure you can find a few racists within the movement),
If you don’t have specific, verifiable proof, then it is racist. There may be individual instances of racism, but to state there is institutional racism requires specific, verifiable proof. Without proof, it is racist.I don’t think to say that rampant de facto segregation of our schools and cities is the result of ongoing institutional racism,
If you do not have specific, verifiable proof that the hiring numbers are intentionally related to race, then the charge is racist. If you have specific evidence against individual firms, then I would stand in condemnation of that firm.I don’t think to observe the fact (and I see this one every day) that black graduates of the best law schools get hired by major firms at a much lower rate than white graduates makes me a racist.
If you do not have specific, verifiable evidence that the reason for any differences is intentionally based on race, it is a racist charge.I don’t think that to acknowledge any of those things makes me a racist. I don’t think noticing that the public school which my daughter will attend starting next week is maintained better, staffed better, is safer, is cleaner, is better in every way, than the school a little black girl a couple of neighborhoods over will attend in the same city makes me a racist.
This is arrogant and is, in itself, a racist charge, because it provides no proof or evidence. To state that any of these are racist without specific, verifiable evidence is a racist charge.I think that to deny any of that is in fact racism, albeit perhaps unconscious.
The greatest denial is the ongoing denial of the source of racism in this country historically, the Democratic Party. The ongoing denial that it continues today is equally egregious.I think that refusal to acknowledge this nation’s sin when it comes to its treatment of our fellow citizens of African descent is shameful. I think refusal to acknowledge that we have to do what we can to make good on the promises of America to all of its citizens is just plain wrong.