You keep calling it excommunication. Are you sure that’s what the bishops call it? Because the article says, over and over again, “critics charge,” and “critics say,” which means that there is an accusation being made, but not that it’s true. This seems like a lame excuse for people who hate the divorce-remarriage communion proposal to throw a tantrum–this has been an ongoing issue for literally decades, and now suddenly people care?
When you and I mortally sin, we’re not “excommunicated,” we’re just not supposed to eat the host until we’ve gone to confession–you know, like Peter, who had a long, private conversation with Jesus after the resurrection.
Only the Donatists would say that apostasy and denying Jesus are “unforgivable sins,” and that’s not what I’m seeing being discussed on this thread.
EDIT: “While these penalties have been described as “de facto excommunication,” the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts, wrote in a March 13, 2006 document that opting out of taxes in a civil situation was not the same as renouncing the faith, and thus excommunication did not apply to such persons.”
They’re not excommunicated. They’re just not allowed to pretend they’re not Catholic when it’s financially convenient and then do all the church stuff when they feel like it.