For Protestants who know their "stuff"

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrianH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You use derisive language like that about these issues and claim to be fair? Hmmm.
I beg your pardon if I offended you, but OSAS itself (which came from the OP) is a derisive expression for Eternal Security…

In practice, that’s what this really is though, fire insurance, decisionism and, frankly, by any standard, its heresy.

We aren’t saved by a decision we make. We aren’t even saved by our repentance.

We’re saved by the benefits of the work of Jesus Christ graciously applied to us without any work or merit on our part.
 
Kitty,

You’re in Canada. Things are different up there.

Here in the States its very much like this, so much so that, as you can see by this message board broadly speaking, many Catholics mistake this sort of thing for “Protestant Christianity”.
 
At the risk of being conceited, I include myself in this group. After being on these boards for quite some time, I have read the posts of a number of fellow Protestants who obviously know their “stuff”.
You have read the Early Christian Fathers, scripture, and with apologies to Cardinal Newman, “Are deep into history”. 😃

Yet, we do not convert for a number of reasons. For me, it is the Marian dogmas, the Papacy, and a very evangelical view about conversion(despite the fact that my own denomination is situationally evangelical).

Yet, on the other hand, most of the people on here who are Episcopalian, Lutheran, Methodist, or Presbyterian know fully well that our respective groups are battling to stay within the realm…of historic orthodox beliefs(yes I know that Catholics do not think we are but WE think we are obviously 😃 )
So, to make a long question longer, does this discourage you like it does me?
You are not converting to Catholicism or Orthodoxy, but you are frustrated with the slow winds, and in some cases they are a monsoon, blowing our churches away from orthodoxy.
How do you handle it? I am not handling it well lately.
Thanks. I am not really interested in debate. I have read all of the debates a hundred times but in the thoughts of people who MIGHT find themselves in this situation.
BH
What’s wrong with the Papacy? There has to be leader, I think it’s obvious. The leader has to be infallible, otherwise his leadership can be always questioned and wouldn’t make any sense. Protestants, just like the pope, believe in their own infallibility but you call it “infallibility of the Scripture”.
Marian dogmas - there’s nothing wrong in asking Mary (and saints) to pray for us. Mary herself asked us in Fatima to say the rosary daily but you call all such apparitions “satanic”. There are obvioulsy no protestant apparitions so you can’t believe there are catholic ones. Sorry, God doesn’t respect a protestant dogma “Sola Scriptura”, he still has something to say to the CC.
It’s not the slow winds but definitely monsoons are blowing your denominations (you are not churches) away from orthodoxy. I’m not surprised you don’t handle it well, especially when you hear a lesbian preacher speaking about her relations with her wife.
It doesn’t seem to be “within the realm of historic orthodox beliefs”. It really discourages many protestants. As a result a group of 400.000 of them want to join the CC…
Let’s face the truth - protestantism failed. I don’t know how protestants can find themselves in this situation. I’m afraid you are on the road to nowhere.
 
So y’all aren’t Catholic because of Papal infallibility, Marian dogmas, confession, or whatever?

Tell the truth.

Its the Catholic Church’s stand on artificial contraception.

Because if you followed this one Catholic teaching, you could remain Protestant and be more Catholic than 98% of us Catholics.
The Catholic teaching on contraception was our gateway into the Catholic Church. We intuited the correctness of the Catholic position on contraception without really understanding it, and give it up (much to the improvement of our marriage, btw). After that, the rest of the picture began to fill in with technicolor and flesh out in all dimensions.
 
I beg your pardon if I offended you, but OSAS itself (which came from the OP) is a derisive expression for Eternal Security…

In practice, that’s what this really is though, fire insurance, decisionism and, frankly, by any standard, its heresy.

We aren’t saved by a decision we make. We aren’t even saved by our repentance.

We’re saved by the benefits of the work of Jesus Christ graciously applied to us without any work or merit on our part.
Ain’t that the truth. But to be fair, serious Protestants “get” this. Spurgeon, among others, expressed this with great eloquence and passion. Eternal security or OSAS is a rather debased understanding of the assurance we have as heirs in faith of Christ’s One perfect sacrifice. Catholics and Protestants are actually much closer on this than we sometimes think.

Protestants taunt us with “go to confession and get out of jail free.” Same thing. Not true. Just as for much of the Protestant world OSAS is “not true.”
 
Hi BrianH,

I wanted to tell you that your OP is one of the most heartfelt and genuine posts I have read on this site. I commend you for your openness and sincerity.

Though, when I left the church, I never turned to Protestantism. When I left, I left, I went to the whole new age, mystical, esoteric, Crowley, enochian and Israel Regaldie fly manure. Now, as you can see I was down in the basement and had the doors shut and locked to salvation. What pulled me out? Who grab my hand and pointed me to Christ?

The Virgin Mother did.

It happened at Conyers Georgia. Now, at that time right before my return to the church, I couldn’t stand the concept of the Virgin Mother or Catholicism for that matter. Even after I came back and knowing that it was she who pulled me out from the basement and said to go see my Son, I rejected her. Talk about flinging poop on your rescuer (I know there is no one that stands between you and Jesus and between Jesus and God) but she led me to Christ. It is a long story and really I don’t want reveal it on the internet.

So how did I get over this “issue”? It wasn’t till I started praying about in stead of ignoring it that it started to click and with the help of some videos and books. It clicked and I saw (even though I experienced it first hand, in my face, with witnesses to the fact) how the Virgin Mother fit in.

To me it was like “Duh” “Hello MAUI, she led you out of hell, dropped you off at Christ’s feet and you still couldn’t get it?”……. I am glad I finally did. It was 10 years later.

I pray for you.

Good luck.
Was it Tim Staples who finally surrendered her saying, “Mary, I accept you as my personal mother?”
 
I don’t see the actual Catholic Church immune from the winds of heresy, having sampled the local teaching. Full of the winds of heresy and false teaching. The local RCIA teacher doesn’t believe there probably was a historical Jesus, for example. He refers to the “Jesus events” that are clouded in uncertainty that we cannot penetrate. And he’s teaching people how to be good Catholics. Not me.

The church I attend is far more Catholic than the Catholic Church.
Ugh! People who hold catechetical positions are not at liberty to teach their own private views. They are responsible for teaching the Catholic faith. I tell ya, for years, the church I attended was “far more Catholic than” – most Catholics. But it could never be more Catholic than the Church. A distinction I failed to discern for a long, long time.
 
What’s wrong with the Papacy? There has to be leader, I think it’s obvious. The leader has to be infallible, otherwise his leadership can be always questioned and wouldn’t make any sense. Protestants, just like the pope, believe in their own infallibility but you call it “infallibility of the Scripture”.
Marian dogmas - there’s nothing wrong in asking Mary (and saints) to pray for us. Mary herself asked us in Fatima to say the rosary daily but you call all such apparitions “satanic”. There are obvioulsy no protestant apparitions so you can’t believe there are catholic ones. Sorry, God doesn’t respect a protestant dogma “Sola Scriptura”, he still has something to say to the CC.
It’s not the slow winds but definitely monsoons are blowing your denominations (you are not churches) away from orthodoxy. I’m not surprised you don’t handle it well, especially when you hear a lesbian preacher speaking about her relations with her wife.
It doesn’t seem to be “within the realm of historic orthodox beliefs”. It really discourages many protestants. As a result a group of 400.000 of them want to join the CC…
Let’s face the truth - protestantism failed. I don’t know how protestants can find themselves in this situation. I’m afraid you are on the road to nowhere.
Well…I am not Sola Scriptura, I never called apparitions “Satanic”, we do not ordain homosexuals…yet…and as far as the rest, you do not sound like a person I would drink coffee with 😉
 
Been there. Been there. YES: I experienced the discouraging frustration with a denomination that kept spinning out of control into depravity as a “revelation of the Holy Spirit.”

I already understood the Marian dogmas – wasn’t crazy about 'em but could defend them.
What with?
Purgatory was no problem
You mean the doctrine the bishop of Rome added after the 1070 east/west split?

If anyonme can find a referance to Purgatory in any ecclesiastical writings pre 1070, I would be most interested. (The referance in 2 Maccabees says nothing of the sort)
. But I had “good” reasons for not converting. Ultimately, Peter pushed me over the Tiber. I could not get past Mt. 16:18. One day, the Boss whispered in my ear: “My Church is where Peter is.”
The Orthodox claims he’s there.
."
All my great arguments melted under that.
My Church is where Jesus is. 😃
We are refugees…
Aliens and strangers.
What do you call Pope John Paul II apology to God about the sins of the members of the Catholic Church then? Do you think the supposed 500 is still unforgiveness?
There are still people who do not hold forgiveness. Half of them don’t know what the dispute was about anymore, hence this “We are the one true church” nonsense.

“We are the one true church” stuff comes through idolatry, the worst idolatry in Christendom isn’t statues and pictures, it’s churches, doctrines, traditions etc etc. Yes we can all be guilty of it.
:hypno: an awful lot of me me me me me going on in this thread.

Thy will be done.
Amen.
Circular argument: The Church teaches that it has not taught error, because it teaches that it cannot err, therefore it is right, so it is right in that it does not teach error. To me this smacks of wilful refusal to actually look at what is being taught - as opposed to what is claimed as being taught.
The Churches teaching that it is not in error could be an error in its self.
uhhh, Luther is dead. 😃
No The Saints in Heaven are alive! 😃
If I may jump in…I believe ecumenism is the effort for unity…not the effort for accepting any doctrine for the sake of unity.
Ecumenicalism should be being lead by The Holy Spirit and therfore being in unity of The Spirit.
 
Not to offend anyone but in reality, the ELCA are too liberal now for that to happen and the Missouri Synod I DONT THINK have that inclination. Just an opinion:o
Well, see, and this is what drew me back to the Catholic church and lead my dh and dc to convert. The ELCA is much too liberal and the LCMS still has the anti-Christ statements on their books. And seeing Christ’s prayer for unity, it doesn’t make sense to move off into ever smaller and smaller denominations.

Luther had some very valid points. Those that were valid have already been incorporated by the Church. In fact, many changes were made even during his lifetime.

There was lots of pride and unforgiveness on both sides at the time, but Luther and others allowed or encouraged the taking over of a religious debate by secular political powers looking for money and even more power.

I know you didn’t want another debate, but I do want to point that out because it is relavant to our situation today. Denominations like the ELCA don’t want to give up their ‘mainstream’ position because they feel that would marginalize them politically. But what is in fact happening is that the “mainstream” is flowing ever more leftward and circling the maelstrom, while many people desperately jumping off to the right. Some are caught up in the barque of St Peter and safety and some jump into another raft (say the LCMS) that is only an elusive safety net.

We pray every day for the unity of all Christians. We need to storm the gates of heaven so that the true 500th anniversary doesn’t find us just as far apart as we are now.
 
I reported this to the priest, who did nothing, and then to the diocese, which did nothing. This guy, hired by the priest, is still teaching.

Nice accusation.😃 We have our own fair crop of idiots over here, too, as is often pointed out.

What good is it to have a church that claims to teach infallible truth, but never seems to bother teaching it, seemingly full of errant bishops and teachers who lead the flock astray and cannot be trusted, that demands it be trusted and then acts in a very untrustworthy manner? Some Catholics say if you don’t like a parish, vote with your feet, which is a very Protestant approach. Because of the poor teaching of the Catholic Church, many Catholics are Protestant.
I agree and I find it a very sad state of affairs. Someone looking for the truth shouldn’t have to ferret out Vactican documents, search all over the internet, and be constantly second guessing what goes on in their parish.

I have two suggestions. Pray (and pray and pray). And get involved as much as you can. Volunteer to teach CCD (get them while they are young!), start a Legion of Mary group, organize volunteers of Adoration (even if it has to be in front of the closed tabernacle that is off in the corner in the dark), raise the money for a shrine to Mary (statue and candles) and arrange to have it installed (again even if it is off in a corner in the dark). Do all you can and be as humble and gracious about it as possible. And only stop when he Bishop himself runs you out of town on a rail, and even then keep praying.
 
Truthstalker,
How long ago was this? In what part of the country do you live? Did the priest give you any reasons that they should be kept? Have you considered complaining higher up, like to the archdiocese or even Rome? I know it may sound silly to go that high up, but it is a serious matter. If it is not important to you, and as a non-Catholic I can see why it would not be, send me the info.🙂
 
When the excommunication against Luther and the Tridentine anathemas are lifted I’ll start taking it seriously.
I find it interesting in the “isn’t this so reprehensible it’s interesting” sense. The Catholic church ex-communicated Martin Luther for having the “audacity” to point out her sins and get the church he dearly loved (yes, for all you Martin bashers out there, Martin Luther loved the Roman Catholic church and did what he did because he wanted her to get back on the right track) in line with the Scriptures and out of simony again.

Yet, the Catholic church, to this very day, has not ex-communicated, even posthumously, Mussolini and Hilter. So when johnny p the 2nd asks for forgiveness for the church’s sins: that would’ve been a good step in the right direction to actually demonstrate that he was sincere about it.😦
 
I may have missed something in history, but it is my understanding that Luther was not excommunicated for pointing out the problems but for teaching heresy. Once he began teaching things that were in contradiction to the teachings of the Church, it was an issue. Some of the things he said were correctly identified as a problem. Some of the things he taught were outright wrong. It is the wrong things that caused the excommunication. Assuming it is not automatically lifted at death, he never altered his teachings to comply with proper doctrine.
 
The original question is asking about personal experiences and thoughts.
It goes without saying that the underlying presupposition for all posters is that they seek to do the will of God (THY will).
That is the assumption most people share about other posters.
This thread can do without the occasional poster who drops in and makes a value judgement about the intentions and motives of others.

“me” count this particular post= 0 :rolleyes:
.
Really? You mean, according to what you put forward here, all “personal experiences and thoughts” are welcome here EXCEPT one that dissents from the dissenters?

Makes as much sense as saying “I’ll only believe that which is explicit in Scripture” Except that there is not one verse in all of Scripture that says that.

(careful while rolling your eyes, pal–they can get stuck in that position.)
 
Really? You mean, according to what you put forward here, all “personal experiences and thoughts” are welcome here EXCEPT one that dissents from the dissenters?

Makes as much sense as saying “I’ll only believe that which is explicit in Scripture” Except that there is not one verse in all of Scripture that says that.

(careful while rolling your eyes, pal–they can get stuck in that position.)
Have a great day
 
There are still people who do not hold forgiveness. Half of them don’t know what the dispute was about anymore, hence this “We are the one true church” nonsense.
True and they are not just Catholics. That’s every human being on earth.

It’s not nonsense that “We are the One True Church.” We Catholics affirm this truth because the pillar and bulwark of truth is the Church. The Catholic Church bears the four marks, it is One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic.
“We are the one true church” stuff comes through idolatry, the worst idolatry in Christendom isn’t statues and pictures, it’s churches, doctrines, traditions etc etc. Yes we can all be guilty of it.
There is no idotatry in Christendom particularly in Catholicism. Though the Eastern Orthodox is not in full communion with us, they also held their own doctrines and tradition. I also believe that they are more conservative than us Catholics sense their fastening and church law is more strict. For example, before receiving Holy Communion at their Divine Liturgy, they must fast at midnight prior to receiving the Body and Blood of the Lord.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church forbids it.

2113 Idolatry not only refers to false pagan worship. It remains a constant temptation to faith. Idolatry consists in divinizing what is not God. Man commits idolatry whenever he honors and reveres a creature in place of God, whether this be gods or demons (for example, satanism), power, pleasure, race, ancestors, the state, money, etc. Jesus says, “You cannot serve God and mammon.” Many martyrs died for not adoring “the Beast” refusing even to simulate such worship. Idolatry rejects the unique Lordship of God; it is therefore incompatible with communion with God.
 
Back to the origional post.

If you are a member of a denomination that, up until recently anyway, teaches traditional truths. Lately, say over the last 20 years, the teachings have been drifting to the other side. Now, lets say that they have crossed the line in some way, you pick it. What choice do you have? You can change, but what if no other church teaches the things you want. You can complain, but it seems like the upper management, if there is one, doesn’t care (case in point, the Episcopalians). You can start your own church. Or you can begin a personal quest to find the truth. Where do you begin? Do you list what you want to find and look for it? Do you start with what is wrong and look for those who teach against it? How does the process work?
 
Yet, the Catholic church, to this very day, has not ex-communicated, even posthumously, Mussolini and Hilter. So when johnny p the 2nd asks for forgiveness for the church’s sins: that would’ve been a good step in the right direction to actually demonstrate that he was sincere about it.😦
I see a lot of anti-Catholic bias you have in your post. Mussolini and Hitler was condemned by Pope Pius XII. They were not practicing Catholic. They were atheistic in their philosphy. Ex-communication is meant for those Catholics who practice their faith but have become disobedient by not adhering to Church Law.
 
Yet, the Catholic church, to this very day, has not ex-communicated, even posthumously, Mussolini and Hilter. So when johnny p the 2nd asks for forgiveness for the church’s sins: that would’ve been a good step in the right direction to actually demonstrate that he was sincere about it.😦
Mussolini and Hitler was condemned by Pope Pius XII. They were not practicing Catholic. They were atheistic in their philosphy. Ex-communication is meant for those Catholics who practice their faith but have become disobedient by not adhering to Church Law.
Just a note of personal experience and observation:

Does anyone else think that referring to John Paull II in the way that SolaFide has done above is a bit inappropriate?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top