J
JRKH
Guest
I think you understand very well.As I understand things, we aren’t supposed to shun anyone but Christians who remain in majorly grievious sin despite our having fraternally corrected them (as in the case of the man who was in a relationship with his step mother mentioned in an an epistle) and this shunning would be for the sole sake of moving him to repentance. But with the heathens I believe we are supposed to love them and pray for them, even if we are only dealing with them on a businness level. But even when dealing with them we should treat them with dignity, kindness, mercy and patience as God treats us all with dignity, is merciful towards all, is kind and patient and lets his sun shine on the just and the unjust. He wants us to be just like Him and he shows his goodness to all, the just and unjust.
The Jews would shun heathens because that was what they were instructed to do in their religion, but with Chritianity we are called to love everyone including our enemies. If we are called to love even heathens, how can we feel right shunning them? What does shunning mean anyway? Maybe that’s why I don’t understand your posts…maybe I don’t know what shunning means.
No, I don’t hang out with pagans, but I pray for them and would try and treat them the same way I would Christians because God wants them and wants me to try and be a good example to them to help lead them to him. I couldn’t have good friends who were pagans because I am very orthodox and we wouldn’t have anything in common and they don’t follow Christ…but I don’t ignore them when I see them in my building.
I think what is meant by treating the Christian like a publican is something I need to understand further. I still don’t understand. Maybe it means to just love them and pray for them from a distance.
I think that to understand better the idea of “treating the Christian like a publican” one must ask ones self if a person is a Christian they follow Christ - and follow His Church. If this person persists in “obstinate opposition” to the teachings of Christ through His Church, as outlined in Mt 18:15-18, where he “…refuses to listen even to The Church…” Should he be considered a “Christian”?
If a person wishes to be considered Catholic, then they should uphold Catholic teaching. To deny the teachings of the Catholic Church is to deny being Catholic. Simple as that.
Now of course where we are dealing with our seperated bretheren, that is non catholic christians, the issues are more complicated in how we approach and dialogue with them.
I think this is where we get into trouble today. We have so called “Catholics”, even very public ones, who are in “obstinate opposition” and are not being called to task by The Church for their opposition. Such “Charity” only confuses the issues.
Sorry getting off topic.
Peace
James