Former Justice John Paul Stevens suggests Kavanaugh should not sit on Supreme Court

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I disagree that there wasn’t anything left to be investigated, and as evidence point to the fact that multiple former classmates/acquaintances of Kavansugh attempted to reach the FBI seeking to be interviewed.
many of them did reach the press though. All I saw were his drinking buddies say he couldn’t have had perfect memory when they saw him hammered. The expressly did not say he was assaulting women after his sixth beer.
 
It was thorough, there just isn’t anything to investigate beyond the witness statements already taken.
  • One person says she was groped at a party
  • Her three named witnesses have no memory of the party, let alone a groping.
  • Her friend clearly said she never met or knew Kavanaugh.
True. And Dr. Ford looked clearly politically motivated.

And totally lacked credibility, yes, I’ sure some say she had credibility. I didn’t see it.
 
Last edited:
At what standard? If you are fine with a standard as low as substantial evidence then that is not clear.
The standard I presented. Extensive multiple investigations, open hearings to hear the parties.
With no corroborating evidence, a reasonable and appropriate decision
And if you were, it is not clear at all why you continually seek referral to the MD police.
That would be the suggestion to the accuser and attorney, because those who have complained about the intensity of the investigation seem to think the nominee should be assumed guilty without evidence.
If you want him shown to be guilty, that is where they must go. Otherwise, he is innocent.
 
40.png
JonNC:
The standard I presented.
You presented the call the MD police standard. Are you withdrawing that standard?
No. If people want a something beyond the extensive FBI investigation, which is not designed to investigate criminal charges, they need needcto file a complaint. Without it, we have a presumption of innocence, one that is not questioned at all br the evidence provided.
My point was the 7th FBI investigation was unnecessary.
 
Last edited:
My point was the 7th FBI investigation was unnecessary.
It was have been pointless but there was a need. After the testimony there were doubts about Kavanugh. The astute move was to have a supplemental investigation that was limited in scope and duration. And a secret report out that leaked information about its favorability for Kavanuagh. It bought some time to make a coutner attack against accusers and gave cover to wavering Republicans.
 
It was have been pointless but there was a need. After the testimony there were doubts about Kavanugh.
Not doubts based on evidence, because there was / is no evidence.
The astute move was to have a supplemental investigation that was limited in scope and duration.
It did serve its purpose.
And a secret report out that leaked information about its favorability for Kavanuagh. It bought some time to make a coutner attack against accusers and gave cover to wavering Republicans.
No counter attack was waged by the committee. They treated her with respect and deference. What did was confirm what was already known: no evidence. None.
 
I have to wonder if a Monica McClain CBF bff and FBI agent ,didn’t have a hand in cooking up this entire specious allegation.Now that we know how corrupt the FBI is,this makes perfect sense
 
Last edited:
I have to wonder if a Monica McClain CBF bff and FBI agent ,didn’t have a hand in cooking up this entire specious allegation.Now that we know how corrupt the FBI is,this makes perfect sense
She was the only friend or family member who joined her in the hearing if I recall.
 
Yes this is true.I guess they weren’t counting on the fact that Leland Keyser might not be a willing participant in this shameful scam.Truth willed out!
 
Yes this is true.I guess they weren’t counting on the fact that Leland Keyser might not be a willing participant in this shameful scam.Truth willed out!
I wonder if there will be blowback on her and Patrick Smyth.
 
The interviewees in the FBI supplemental investigation should have included the people that Ford named as the friends who she confided in about the assault. To say there is “no evidence” is patently false.

If what you want to say is “there is no evidence that is satisfactory to me”, then say that.

There has been no direct or first-hand evidence presented by Ford, but whether you like it or not, past confessions to a other people about the alleged assault does count toward evidence in favor of (not against) her testimony. Remember, her testimony does NOT simply consist of the core allegation (sexual assault by Kavanaugh) but other details about her life, including circumstantial details.

Thus, many other of Ford’s claims given during her testimony could have been investigated.

Was she really a member or frequenter of the Columbia Country Club in her teens? Investigate.

Who were Ford’s closest friends when she was 15 / durong her sophmore year in high school? Investigate.

What can those friends tell us about Ford and any social events she went to?Investigate.

Do they recall any time in 1982 when Ford was acting noticeably different or affected by something? Investigate.

Did Mark Judge really work at the supermarket Ford says he did around the time she says she did 1982?
Investigate.

Did Ford and Kavanaugh have mutual friends/social links? Investigate.

Was there ANY party or social gathering in which Kavanaugh and Ford were both present? INVESTIGATE.

That last one could easily be investigated by opening up the interviews to former classmates and acquaintances.

Not only Ford’s former classmates and acquaintances, but also Kavanaugh’s. Especially those who were willing and offering to come forward (they could provide other leads).

What we do know is that there are three unknown/uidentifies people who the FBI interviewed.
 
Last edited:
Lots of details to chew on for months there!

None of it would shed any light on the 30+ yr old groping allegation
 
Last edited:
this just in, could change everything.


FBI discover ice in Kavanaugh’s kitchen, more stashed in garage freezer. The footage shows agents carrying boxes with evidence, each ice cube thoroughly labeled and documented.
 
this just in, could change everything.


FBI discover ice in Kavanaugh’s kitchen, more stashed in garage freezer. The footage shows agents carrying boxes with evidence, each ice cube thoroughly labeled and documented.
I think we should abolish ICE.
 
There’s no commandment against gloating, I guess.
Wouldn’t that be Pride?

However, I find some humor on the recent arguments helps put them in their proper perspective.

A student threw some ice in a bar ? ! ? ! ? That never should have gotten any coverage. The people pushing such bad character attacks should reflect a bit.
 
Last edited:
Remember, as is being justified on CAF…this is a job interview
I don’t think the analogy really works, but let’s think about it a little more. If one was interviewing another person for a job, the very last person the prospective employer would listen to about the interviewee would be someone who coveted that same job.

So the Repub senators were supposed to listen to the uncorroborated allegations of the Dems?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top