Fr. Corapi Responds to Some of His Order's Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter jwinch2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
catharina said:
Why would she?
Are there charges against her?
Click to expand...
Just him charging her with breach of contract and he asked her to not say anything for 5 years of leaving, I think it said, She has been called a drunk, drug addict, liar, “crazy”, prostitute, etc. etc. among other things, possibly effecting the jury pool (which is what he said he wanted in court) You aren’t supposed to do that.
It’s very odd because her family isn’t banned, it said her husband works for him as an indpendent contractor and the children could go on the property with permission. I suppose they didn’t say anything, but still odd.
She didn’t say anything online etc then or now…she really only talked in the proper channels.

I think Father C was bashed a lot by many “professional Catholics” but many were shocked and didn’t have anything against him personally, so much information came out they didn’t know about and that changes how you preceive things. It was a mess, but mainly in a small circle not outside of watchers of EWTN or Catholic radio.
It is wrong to speculate though, the fruits either grow or wither and time will show that.
 
May the grace and peace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.

Fr Corapi made an interesting statement one time in one of his public talks. He said that Archbishop Fulton Sheen had adopted a prostitute and that she eventually became a very holy woman. He also said that very few people were aware that the Archbishop ever did this.

It’s no secret that Fr Corapi esteemed the late Archbishop. I hope that he did not try to imitate him in this same respect…and it went awry.

God bless you,
Quis ut Deus 3
 
debraran said:
Just him charging her with breach of contract and he asked her to not say anything for 5 years of leaving, I think it said, She has been called a drunk, drug addict, liar, “crazy”, prostitute, etc. etc. among other things, possibly effecting the jury pool (which is what he said he wanted in court) You aren’t supposed to do that.
It’s very odd because her family isn’t banned, it said her husband works for him as an indpendent contractor and the children could go on the property with permission. I suppose they didn’t say anything, but still odd.
She didn’t say anything online etc then or now…she really only talked in the proper channels.

I think Father C was bashed a lot by many “professional Catholics” but many were shocked and didn’t have anything against him personally, so much information came out they didn’t know about and that changes how you preceive things. It was a mess, but mainly in a small circle not outside of watchers of EWTN or Catholic radio.
It is wrong to speculate though, the fruits either grow or wither and time will show that.
Click to expand...
Yes, exactly, so no matter what his “charges”
against her, she has gone to the proper authorities.
 
Threads are closed after 1,000 posts for technical reaons. Thank you for participating.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top