Well… really

now if Bp Gracida says he
hasn’t spoken w/ Fr Corapi
Bishop Gracida did not directly communicate, that is; spoke with Father Corapi, but, he did communicate through someone as we learned some time later when Father Corapi specified:
"Many have asked, or criticized, me concerning the reason I filed a civil defamation suit against the accuser in this case. It is because the two men I respect most in the Catholic Church advised me to do so. Fr. James Flanagan, Founder and most respected member of the Society of Our Lady of the Most Holy Trinity, and Bishop Rene Gracida, the former Bishop of Corpus Christi, had a meeting on this matter. The result was that they advised me strongly to file a civil defamation suit. Why would they do this? Because they felt it was the only way I could receive a fair and just hearing. This advice was conveyed to me through Fr. Tony Anderson of the Society of Our Lady.
Confusion also happens when people try to control the thoughts of the mass, when communicators are being intentionally ambiguous and vague. Great diplomats are great at this. They say something in such away that the enemy can take it as pro for him and the allies can take it as pro for them. It’s something they learn in international relations communication. But, when the mass is confused that means the diplomats failed.
The information given to us has been contradictory, vague, limited and ambiguous. This way the attention is kept on the matter and the least amount of people walk away. Again, part of good diplomacy is to communicate in such a general and vague way as to keep every one happy and in suspension. Perhaps, until the autobiography comes out?
Then, clearly explain to people matters which in good faith should have been cleared already (e.g. the priesthood and being laicized). The problem here is that the** faithfuls are guided by the Holy Spirit** and many things here do not appear right to most of us. The laity are not sitting ducks. (I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be as shrewd as snakes and as innocent as doves). We are not going to throw stones at our Bishops and the Church just because someone claims that the Church will not provide a fair trial. How foolish to have thought that the Holy Spirit can be manipulated and controlled!
In Catholic terms, what all this appears to me as is a great attempt to manipulate the sensus fidelium and in response - having the Holy Spirit demonstrate that He cannot be manipulated nor controlled. There was an attempt to evade Bishop Mulvey and Servant Priest Sheehan the proper and legitimate Church authorities of this matter, and have a public trial on account of fame, but, it has all turned around. Now, accusations are flying high against Catholic commentators and everyone else that is pointing out the incorrectness of this direction. What I see happening now is a great retreat to the ditches.
It is not proper to attempt to control the sensus fidelium. Is the lesson, I hope, has been learned. Also, minor detail, the cause at the very minimum must be in accordance with the teachings of the Church and in communion with the Magisterium.
What impresses me and grants me peace is the silence and humility of Bishop Mulvey.
A very insightful theme that emerges in this section with its inclusive emphasis on the entire people of God revolves around the nuances that attend its affirmation of the importance of the sensus fidei for the Church’s abiding in the truth. Itself an aspect of the gift of faith the sensus fidei enables each believer by the Spirit of Truth “to recognize and respond to the Word of God, to discern truth from falsehood in matters of faith and morals, to gain deeper insights into what they believe and to apply that belief to daily life.” This rather comprehensive notion of the sensus fidei (note that it embraces the daily life of discipleship!) may not, however, be presumed upon. Individuals and groups may fall away from it – truth is not separated from holiness – and the individual act of faith (“I believe”) must always participate in the communal act of the Church (“we believe”) (37). Believers are indeed co-workers with the truth and for that reason their participation in the process of authoritative discernment is as dependent on the gift of the Holy Spirit as are those entrusted with office in the Church. Contemplation and study are necessary so as not to reduce the sensus fidelium to an “opinion poll or referendum on matters of faith” (43). Certainly this is a fair warning in our postmodern age with its rapidly accessible media and consumerist mentality.
vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/documents/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_071101_speaking_the_truth_com_en.html
Peace,
Abba