D
debraran
Guest
It’s funny to listen to youtube excerpts from him on obedience and humility and not being confrontational, how he wasn’t a quitter…things change,but it still was strange,
Robertanthony: (Post #286)An apology if someone else has already said this.
One of Father Corapis mottos is "Surrender is NOT an Option". Could this message be his way of forcing the issue regarding the treatment of accused priests (not just himself) ? Maybe, in his own way, hes exercising heroic virtue by sacrificing his good name, and taking advantage of his high profile, for the sake of other priests… He DID say: “I don`t care what anybody thinks of me.”.
I don’t know him personally, so how would I know? This I know: he said he was willing to wager $100 000 that a cocaine/drug test performed on him would come back negative, but if it came back positive, that he’d give the money the next day. That could be an indication of how well-off he is, and it wouldn’t be over the top to think his financial werewithal comes partly from the settlement money.This was put up earlier; but no one commented: (#160)
(Change “this message” to “his actions”.)
Robertanthony: (Post #286)
How do you know what Fr Corapi did with the settlement money?
You seem a bit quick to judge, though.I don’t know him personally, so how would I know?.. That could be an indication of how well-off he is, and it wouldn’t be over the top to think his financial werewithal comes partly from the settlement money.
You could be right. Perhaps you’ll be interested to know that I give (Father) John Corapi full credit (along with God’s love) for my change of heart toward God and the Catholic Church, both of which I had written off. I don’t enjoy witnessing this.You seem a bit quick to judge, though.
There is a huge difference in Fr. Corapi, from his older videos and the newer ones. His conference in Cincinnati last year was quite strange, in my opinion. He talked about buying his Harley in cash, his Montana ranch and how he sleeps with a loaded gun next to him. Something has clearly happened to him. I’m very concerned about his mental health. However, when I heard that he had this name Black Sheep Dog registered for over a year now, it makes me sit back and wonder if this whole thing was planned. ( This is just me wondering, mods.) How convenient to have this happen and a book coming out right alongside this scandal. I won’t be buying it,I was responding to the quote posted by Father Groeschel. It was not meant specifically about Father Corapi. However, to be fair, I did notice a difference in his later videos as compared to his earlier ones. The early ones were more humble in my view as compared to his later ones. Perhaps I am just seeing things which are not there but I do remember getting that impression…
I don’t see how any of this applies. I never saw anything that said he asked to be laicized.When a man is laicized, he receives what is known as a “rescript of laicization.” This is basically a boilerplate document that says what he may and may not do as a lay person.
Back in 2006, Jimmy Akin published a concise summary of what this boilerplate looks like. The key points are below (go to this link to see the actual boilerplate):
The main do’s and don’ts that pertain to how the priest is to conduct himself on an ongoing basis are found in sections 4 and 5 of the rescript and can be summarized as follows:
- He can’t celebrate any of the sacraments except for hearing deathbed confessions. It is especially noted that he can’t give homilies.
- He can’t serve as an extraordinary minister of holy Communion.
- He can’t serve any “directive office in the pastoral field” (e.g., serving as a parish administrator).
- He can’t do anything at all in a seminary.
- He can’t serve as a director or teacher in a Catholic university.
- He can’t teach theology or any closely related discipline (e.g., religious studies, history of theology) in a non-Catholic university.
- He can’t serve a director (e.g., school principal) in a parochial school.
- He can’t serve as a teacher in a parochial school unless he gets the bishop’s permission.
- He shouldn’t live in or frequent places where his status as an ex-priest is generally known, unless he gets the bishop’s permission.
So, again, unless Father Corapi’s intent is to leave communion with the Church, his ability to do his job will be severely limited. That is, of course, unless he works out some special deal with the Vatican that limits him far less than the above. See point #9. Father Corapi would have a hard time functioning just about any place without people knowing who he was and that he is a priest.
For the Christ centered person, all suffering is a gift. Our example is Christ Himself.I buried a baby boy, 2 years, 7 months and 1 day old after a tragic accident at home. The suffering is unbearable. His death was not and will never be a ‘gift’.
You can’t say that the pain another person suffers is a gift from God that should be accepted with open arms. You don’t know that to be true. Maybe God will bring good from what happened to Fr Corapi but to insinuate that this is some painful gift to be embraced is awful.
catholicmediacoalition.org/persecuted_priests.htmOne of Father Corapis mottos is "Surrender is NOT an Option". Could this message be his way of forcing the issue regarding the treatment of accused priests (not just himself) ? Maybe, in his own way, hes exercising heroic virtue by sacrificing his good name, and taking advantage of his high profile, for the sake of other priests… He DID say: “I don`t care what anybody thinks of me.”.

I do, but given that he has never been privy to the source or the content of the complaint, he may have initially thought it came from someone else - besides the former employee that he tried so hard to help.I don’t recall Fr. Corapi saying he barely knew the woman.
At the moment he was placed on administrative leave, he was put in a position where he was not able to minister publicly as a priest. Nothing has changed, except that he has decided not to fight with them about it. He is going to move on in the direction he believe that God has called him, which is to preach, and guard the flock of God. If the authorities forbid him to do so publicly as a priest, then he will obey them.OK so just an hour ago Fr. made a tweet on twitter from his black sheep dog page and said…
“Please love the Church. You follow the Church. I am not against the Church, I am still a priest, just not ministering publicly.”
But the question now is well…what kind of priest does or will the Church see him as? And if he continues going on with his new program to preach will the Catholic Church support this. Anyone?
But this is exactly the case! All who are ordained as priests are set apart by virtue of their vocation. Much more is expected of them than “ordinary men”. They have responsibilities and obligations that laypersons do not, and they answer to canon laws that don’t apply to those who are not priests. It is these very canon laws that are being implemented right now. No layperson would ever be in this situation. He does have to answer to rules and authorities that others do not, because he is a priest.I completely reject any suggestion that John Corapi (or any man) has been somehow set apart by God such that he is above responding to the rules and authorities that apply to ordinary men.
I don’t hear him saying that he believes he is exempt from anything. On the contrary, he has consistently supported the authority of the bishop to act, even though he believes the action is wrong.Code:Even if one were to credit the above stories (which all appear to come exclusively from the person supposedly being afforded this unique divine attention), we do not have a tradition of excusing certain allegedly holier-than-the-rest-of-us individuals from oversight or from adhering to proper standards.
In accepting the suspension of his faculties, he is recognizing the authority of the bishop and his superiors to take this action. I am sure if he develops any stigmata, he will submit to Rome’s investigation of them.If anything the opposite is true. Even St. Francis sought permission from the Pope to preach as he did, and submitted to Rome’s investigation of his stigmata.
If he cannot submit to the rules of the order, he will need to leave the order. This is not uncommon either. The order changed the constitutions, and he no longer fits. He may belong in a different order, or none at all.I don’t find it particularly holy or merit-worthy for a priest to refuse his superior’s request to conform to the rules of his order, to refuse to meet with his bishop before quiting the priesthood, or to threaten lawsuits to prevent his superiors from talking to his accusers.
I agree.He is a good speaker, and I would like to believe he was well-intentioned, but neither excuses bad behavior or exempts him from scrutiny and oversight.
No, the lawsuit and the separation of the disgruntled employee predated all this recent scandal. That will be clear when the police report is located.That is part of the problem. A claim like that is scandalous, especially without giving solid evidence to support the accusation.
According to his superior, they couldn’t do a complete investigation because he filed the civil lawsuit. If the unamed bishop told him to file the lawsuit to keep the investigators from gathering information, then he should have ignored the advice.
I have been a fan of Fr. Corapi, but this turn troubles me greatly.
Peace
Tim
Is a police report or a civil lawsuit considered public information to the world to see?No, the lawsuit and the separation of the disgruntled employee predated all this recent scandal. That will be clear when the police report is located.
Great, but distressing, article!catholicmediacoalition.org/persecuted_priests.htm
After reading this article, I think you may be correct.
Jesus, I trust in You. Help us.![]()
I don’t understand this statement. I mean, of course, he has an obligation to obedience, but I don’t see where he has not?Code:There is no room for disobedience to the bishop.