Fr John Corapi has Announced in a Video Message that he is Leaving the Priesthood

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think what the previous poster meant about the copyright was that he seemed to be copywriting it not for the name of the book, but for a website. That would mean he was thinking of not just having the johncorapi site but a new one. To have one just for your book is not unheard of I suppose, but he might have been thinking of this for a while as he was not happy. Someone had the full copyright, it said preaching, selling and books, things like that.
I don’t know how much more his autobiography will have, since his conversion story is out there but I’m sure he will have more background. I don’t know how much money it will be but I know I read it wouldn’t be on Amazon, because of what he would have do, just his site. If that’s the case, the price might be higher.
 
My point exactly, St Paul also said that he was still running the race. My motivation in the comparison was exactly that…a comparison. By that I do not allude to Fr John being a saint. Nor an apostle called by the Lord. What I have said with the comparisons is all that I can determine in the similarities…THAT IS ALL. I just finished a research comparing The Servant of God Catherine de Hueck Doherty to St Maria Skobtsova…the similarities are quite outstanding, enough for the postulator of Catherine Doherty’s cause to keep in touch with me. But that is all I was dong…comparing, not declaring Catherine Doherty a saint. Not my job…
I have no right to call anybody a saint (with a big S), that is our Mother Church’s role of doing so. I respect that. As much as Fr John was a good preacher…there are others as well that have touched me greatly. Fr Groeschel is certainly one of them. I was blessed to go and hear him in a conference and let me tell you that he does not have his tongue in his pocket also.

Now by saying that, I do not elevate Fr Groeschel to sainthood…nor even compare him ot St Paul. But as Fr Groeschel says, take what is good and apply it in your own life. Discern on the side of caution (Still small voice)

We have excellent and inspired teachers/preachers out there. Just some are more in the public than the others. We are truly blessed by the richness of the catholic church…

That’s fine. Maybe I’m just a little bothered by the comments on his website…

too much assumptions on his behalf.

I was also bothered by the Catholic blogs, being a little too quick.

Anyway thank you for your thoughts and your own perspective on Fr. Corapi, Shoshona.

May the Lord bless and keep you. 🙂
 
I also love Fr. Groechel, when I came back to the church, his soft voice (along with Mother’s louder one) helped me along. Father Corapi caught my attention but I didn’t get to see how he lived, many preach, they say the right words, but I knew pretty much, how Fr. G and Mother lived off the show. I met Fr. G and his friars and my teenage daughter wanted to come also. It wasn’t a big mega-stadium but a “theology on tap” room in a restaurant. I can’t explain it with words, but there is a holiness (not perfection) with the brother’s and priests I met. Nothing was said with words really, just an aura. I think when you give up so much to give to others, you empty yourself so much, if you are happy, it reflects on your teaching. I never said a word, but my daughter said to me, 'I really like them, they are holy". When she watched Fr. C, she didn’t feel that, she said, he seemed to like the act of preaching, he seemed egotistical, but she didn’t feel the same thing.
I’m glad some do, I don’t like the rabid following on his FB, I looked twice and went off, it was “cult-like” and I fear that some are in a “him against the rest” mode. They need prayers also. I fear if the worst happened and he started to stray away from the church a little, they woudln’t see it.

I have been more faithful to givng to EWTN becuase without them I never would have met so many good priests and nuns and learned so much. I hope Father doesn’t forget how many years they had him on and gave him free adverstising for his show,website and books and not say anything against them to feed the fire or those protesting. I wish he would say something postive, but time will tell.
 
This is not true. At the time he was placed on administrative leave both he and Santa Cruz Media issued statements indicating they knew exactly who brought the charges and what they were.
The investigative procedure Corapi wrote about on his blog indicates he is not allowed to know who his accuser is or what the accusation is.

So when he came out telling us he has this knowledge, more red flags…

Also, the lawsuit he has filed concerns breach of a non-disclosure agreement.
The lawsuit was filed in response to the complaints to the Bishops.
This seems odd to me. If the accusations are false, why go after non-disclosure breach? Why not libel? Or Slander?
Why non-disclosure breach?

Unless the information provided was accurate somewhere, there could not be a breach of non-disclosure…could there?

Another problem I am having…why do I know so much about his accuser and why is it Corapi is the one that told me?
 
I can certainly appreciate the tendency to put people on a pedestal, especially when one feels very helped by that person, or even as if their whole spiritual life has been salvaged by listening to that person, as some have testified in their posts. I don’t under understand the last part, though. Can you help me understand what that has to do tiwh “ignoring the mystical body of the Church”?
Believe me, I do it all the time, which I always have to remind myself to keep things in order. God first, God first, etc.

What I meant, is a lot of the tone concerning Corapi about the Mystical Body, is
treating this situation with emotions as if it is a man losing just a job, rather than something occurring within the Church itself; and an otherworldly vocation.

Even though, the bishops might be making bad judgements in his case, in studying the lives of the Saints, all these trials, and chastisements occur, there is a spirit of perserverence…a lot of the sentiments in rallying behind a man, as opposed to trusting that the Lord make straight everything in his mercy and justice concerning his children. Even if we won’t see it, evidently, What if Fr. Corapi is undergoing a chastisement or a trial?? As well as those involved?
Have you ever studied the life of St. Bernadette?

I feel as if many of Corapi people are judging the actions of his superiors as if this is some sort of Secular ordeal/injustice, with a manufactured folk hero status.

While it is true administratively, the Church has its own politics within, Jesus will not leave us orphans. Even though hearts may be hardened in the channels of our Church, God has the ear of the servants within too, regarding their faithfulness…so why should Fr. Corapi in his faithfulness, not have an advocate in Christ & the Blessed Mother if he is in the right? :confused:
Corapi does not belong to a religious order. The society (SOLT) is an apostolate that is “in the world”. It has houses all over the world, and the members don’t take the same kinds of vows one does to join a religious order. That is why he was allowed to live in a home of his own while still being a member.
So he may literally not be a religious order, but all of us in some capacity, must be numb to the world. Indifferent to it, for God’s sake. We are to be salt, and light, not blending into the darkness of their ways.
They are mixed, whether we like it or not. We are pilgrims on this earth, and we are “in the world, but not of it”. He is called to be a preacher, and if his bishop cannot tolerate his preaching, then he will have to go elsewhere. He can’t just fail to do what God has called him to do because certain people don’t like it.
It is very difficult, but when we finally get the core of the faith. We’ll never belong to the world, it’s alien…this is why we have the Mass, a recharging and a reminder, of how removed we are, and how we are “sent” to be lights. To suggest, that he can still be satisfied or his direction where he feels he might have a new beginning as Black SHeep dog, is trying to keep one foot in the door of the church, while peeking and looking in the next room, in the door of Manna. I don’t want him to do this.

What if God called him to preach for 20 years and wants him to become a contemplative or to humble him? Remember Moses had a talent as leader, and he made a mistake, because of the weakness of his faith, and was shut out of the promised land…he wanted it.
Fulton Sheen had a great calling and charisma, he had both worldly success…and then,
He was humbled. He said he suffered from the sin of vanity, he was pretty much silenced, as many Saintly people, (though I pray for his canonization) undergo jealousy and resentment by their peers. He also had an understanding of offering up that suffering to Christ – Sheen, however, devoted himself the Eucharist so he persevered. And in that, you’ll see the picture, when Fulton Sheen was embraced during at least I believe a whole decade of sorrow, by Pope John Paul II…while his health was deteriorating and he may have anguished over the erosion of our Church too… in a way he literally laid down and died… in his chapel before the Blessed Sacrament…

Every one is a servant, to please God, no servant is greater than his master. Embrace the cross and hug it, with all your heart. Unite yourself with Jesus’s work… Corapi doesn’t strike me as if he wants to do that . If we are to serve, or hear our calling. There will be crosses. And God even said to Peter, you may be led, where you do not want to go…

St. Francis of Assisi wanted to be martyred, St. Anthony, St. Theresa of Avila had a will or felt an inspiration to be martyred in Morocco. God had other plans.

In Fr. Corapi’s letter, or Black Sheep Dog, as he rejects the title of father for some reason, Black Sheep Dog’s letter, he laments the persecutions and the sins against him, with resentment. Does he really think it’s God’s will to go back into marketeering??
Going into some secular format of preaching won’t satisfy him.
Yes, I see this too.
Which is why it’s saddening. I also don’t understand why people have to walk around eggshells, to be blunt about the actions here, but oh well. 🤷

The truth and honesty is hard to hear but it must be said. Jesus did not give us a spirit of timidity.
 
The other thing that bothered me is the fact he wouldn’t let his employees talk about just this subject and let them out of the agreement. If he did they said they coudl continue but without interviews, how could they conclude anything? Most secular cases are done with interviews, that part never sat right with me, but I know it doesn’t mean he’s guilty of anything, but it does make it seem like he wants to hide facts.

Also the fact he wanted to cloud judgements by putting voicemails on the Internet and then said his “fans” were right, he would listen to them, he needed them. (I’m sure his lawyers concluded that also) This is not a man thinking clearly, it’s sad.
 
The investigative procedure Corapi wrote about on his blog indicates he is not allowed to know who his accuser is or what the accusation is.

So when he came out telling us he has this knowledge, more red flags…

Also, the lawsuit he has filed concerns breach of a non-disclosure agreement.
The lawsuit was filed in response to the complaints to the Bishops.
This seems odd to me. If the accusations are false, why go after non-disclosure breach? Why not libel? Or Slander?
Why non-disclosure breach?

Unless the information provided was accurate somewhere, there could not be a breach of non-disclosure…could there?

Another problem I am having…why do I know so much about his accuser and why is it Corapi is the one that told me?
Don’t know. I wish he never posted those youtubes or reacted in this manner to his case on those blog entrees…just makes things more difficult now and confusing for Catholics exposed to it.
 
Rather than Paul I think a comparrison between Corapi and Malachi Martin is more appropriate. And I like Malachi Martin!
It seems to me they might be (have been) in the same boat. Malachi Martin uncovered things about certain people in the Church that were not very becoming to put it nicely. But it seems to me he called a spade a spade. He died in a very suspicous way, which I will probably always wonder about and maybe find out when I get to heaven. (hopefully)🙂
 
Also, the lawsuit he has filed concerns breach of a non-disclosure agreement.
The lawsuit was filed in response to the complaints to the Bishops.
This seems odd to me. If the accusations are false, why go after non-disclosure breach? Why not libel? Or Slander?
Why non-disclosure breach?

Unless the information provided was accurate somewhere, there could not be a breach of non-disclosure…could there?
Because a compensated non-disclosure agreement is presumably easier to adjudicate. Much less to have to prove and has built in remedies. Ex employee is not suppose to say anything and they said something, case done. Libel can be more difficult to prove in court, you have to get into all the details of what was said, what was true what was not true, longer and more difficult. I wouldn’t read much into this(the type of civil case filed), this is why you have a non-disclosure agreement.

The only thing I would read into it I guess is that it is consistent with what was previously stated by Fr. Corapi and SOLT - that accusations don’t include a crime. A non-disclosure would not be able to block criminal evidence (I don’t believe).
 
Whether or not it is against canon law is not for him or for us to say-that’s for the canon lawyers of the hierarchy. He had two options-to contest that through the proper channels and set an example for other Catholics how to behave in such a situation, or to go outside those channels and fight with the hierarchy. He chose to fight with the hierarchy and to indict the bishops as a whole and the seminaries as a whole. That was wrong, and not the proper way for any Catholic, let alone a priest, to behave.
*I believe you are right. Here is something a friend wrote to me:

*The steps he has taken I believe, played very much into the scheme of the devil. The only reason I am not overly concerned is that I know that even with this wrong turn he has taken, God can make something beautiful out of.

I truly believe he should have just shut up, spent his time in silence with the Lord (which I think he needs very much) and left it all in God’s hands.

St Therese of Lisieux once commented about one of her sisters on how this sister was far too concerned about her “rights”. It is very difficult to surrender our will and it is very easy to find rationalizations for not surrendering. I have always stressed that when we come up with rationalizations, it usually means that the act is less than God like.

I compare Fr Corapi’s reaction with all those others who have been “persecuted’ by the Church and the saints took a different path to his. In the end, they were vindicated just as Christ was - who meekly accepted the calumny and death.

I think he missed the lesson of the “death to self” that this “persecution” provided. Dying to self starts with a relinquishment of what we perceive as our rights and an acceptance of the humiliation that certain circumstances bring.

My former spiritual director was a very effective and competent missionary in Africa. She achieved a lot in the time she was there. One day she just collapsed in her room and could not move any part of her body. She defecated and urinated where she lay because no one thought to check where she was because she always busy and up and about. When they found her she was hospitalized for a long time. She said of this “fallow” time that it was a wake-up call from the Lord. The good work she was doing was getting into her head making her think that she was some super woman doing all this “for the Lord”.

When we are dealt an unfair blow, we need to discern well what God is trying to tell us with such a blow – for without His permission that blow would not have been dealt.

I think Fr Corapi needs to surrender everything to God and find the real value of being silent with the Lord.
*I believe she has hit the nail on the head.

God bless all
Cinette*
 
St Therese of Lisieux once commented about one of her sisters on how this sister was far too concerned about her “rights”. It is very difficult to surrender our will and it is very easy to find rationalizations for not surrendering. I have always stressed that when we come up with rationalizations, it usually means that the act is less than God like.
Yes, and St. Therese also is attributed with saying, when someone criticized her, “Well, I deserve far worse.”

That’s holiness, no?
 
Who do you think is responsible?
The devil. MAY CHRIST REBUKE HIM.

The dia*boline. Greek word for, to REND ASUNDER…lots of torn emotions is resulting from the actions of both sides. Bishops accusing others, priests accusing bishops.

:*

I agree 100%. That’s the point I was making in earlier posts about Father Corapi’s pain not being a gift from God. The devil causes pain…and chaos, division, doubt, fear, anxiety and false accusations…etc

I know why the devil does it. He can’t hurt God directly so he causes Him pain by hurting His children. The devil knows that the pain he causes God’s children hurts God, too.

I understand why there is evil in the world. If there was no evil, there would be no free will. We would have no choice but to be “good” like little robots. If things were perfect-happy and peaceful all the time, we wouldn’t need God or seek Him out. We wouldn’t love Him.

The pain of life drives us towards Him and reminds us that we need Him. I know that. But it’s so unfair. When you’re faithful to God and evil pulls the rug right out from under you and you go flying, it’s just…I dunno. It just blows your mind that this can even happen. And the resulting pain does make you angry and disappointed so of course Fr Corapi is going to have those emotions. Do everything right and you still lose (and least that’s how it seems). For those outside the event, it’s easy to say things that are patronizing…like it was God’s will or your suffering is a gift. But when you’re in the middle of that pain, God doesn’t seem like much of a friend. And having someone tell you it was His will or His gift only magnifies the pain. Even though God may bring great things from it, in the moment when you’re at your lowest, you want to know that God is on your side and is supporting you. Thinking that He caused you this pain (for any reason at all-even if you deserved it as a result of a horribly sinful life), drives you from Him-not to Him. It’s hard to cling to God for support when people are saying things that make you think God caused your pain (Like saying it’s God’s Will or a gift).

Fr Corapi is suffering. The accusation, whether true or false, has turned his life upside down. Does he deserve far worse? I don’t think so. I don’t think saying another person deserves their suffering is very christian. In fact, I think it’s horrible to say that to another person in pain. Christ spent His time on earth alleviating suffering-not causing it.

All of us deserve hell based on our sins. But Christ redeemed us with His suffering.

Whether God can bring good from pain or not, that pain is life shattering. Fr Corapi needs prayers and support. He will always be one of God’s priests and we can’t afford to lose him or any other priests. We just don’t have that many that we can afford to have one removed from service.
 
Code:
I think what the previous poster meant about the copyright was that he seemed to be copywriting it not for the name of the book, but for a website. That would mean he was thinking of not just having the johncorapi site but a new one. To have one just for your book is not unheard of I suppose, but he might have been thinking of this for a while as he was not happy. Someone had the full copyright, it said preaching, selling and books, things like that.
I don’t know how much more his autobiography will have, since his conversion story is out there but I’m sure he will have more background. I don’t know how much money it will be but I know I read it wouldn’t be on Amazon, because of what he would have do, just his site. If that’s the case, the price might be higher.
I think you are right. It would not surprise me if he was not seeing the handwriting on the wall for some time now. He has made mention of “certain people” who wanted to shut him down, and this is easy to see, listening to his talks. He has often repeated what one conference participant told him once - that his greatest gift is that he does “not give a rat’s you know what about what people think”. For that reason he has not been shy about speaking out when people have “left the faith” and do things that are against the Teaching of the Church. There is a youtube video about “the scandal of Notre Dame” that I did not see until last week. It is blunt, and probably offensive to those who were in the positions to make decisions.

Clearly, he really DOES care a lot about what people think, or he would not have gotten so hurt and angry about all this. Maybe it is a wake up call that his “gift” does not prevent him from normal human frailities?
 
The investigative procedure Corapi wrote about on his blog indicates he is not allowed to know who his accuser is or what the accusation is.

So when he came out telling us he has this knowledge, more red flags…
I think he made an accurate guess. The woman that used to work for him promised to “ruin” him when she separated from employment. She also left at least two drunken enraged messages on his voice mail.

But from official channels, apparently the accuser is not provided with this information. It is probably among the requests his attorney’s have made that were not honored, and one of the reasons he was advised by his attorney’s not to continue the investigation. From an official point of view, he may have missed the mark entirely, and is being charged with something else by someONE else. I think he is probably right in guessing the source, but I think it would have been better had he not said anything at all.
Code:
 Also, the lawsuit he has filed concerns breach of a non-disclosure agreement.
The lawsuit was filed in response to the complaints to the Bishops.
This seems odd to me. If the accusations are false, why go after non-disclosure breach? Why not libel? Or Slander?
Why non-disclosure breach?
I am not so sure about the timing of that lawsuit. The other curiosity is that, if he did not know the source of the complaint, how did he know she had breached the contract? Did one of her voice messages give him that info?

I have very little public exposure, so it it hard for me to put myself in his shoes. But if I had an employee that was out of control with alcohol that came to work and assaulted employees so that police had to be called, tried to steal the website for the title of my book, and threatened to “bring me down”, I could see why a non-disclosure contract might help protect me and my business.

Having had more experience with these types of employment separations and non-disclosures, I know that it is much easier to pursue the non-disclosure than it is slander or libel. Nowadays, in our new electronic age, the two are combined (legally) into “defamation”. It still sometimes ends up with your word against theirs, and it is hard to prove who they might have sent defaming emails to, or keep track of defaming comments on blogs, etc. On the other hand, the disclosure is cut and dried. The person either communicated information, or not, and the QUALITY of that info does not need to be assessed (whether it is damaging to character), only the fact that it was released at all.
Unless the information provided was accurate somewhere, there could not be a breach of non-disclosure…could there?
Yes. The disclosure of any kind of info, good, bad, or ugly is a breach of the contract. If she did want to write an unauthorized biography, for example, it might not even say anything negative in it, but it is still a breach.

This is why the bishop wanted him to withdraw the suit. It is considered a way of “coercing” the witness, and canon law says that this is not to happen.
Another problem I am having…why do I know so much about his accuser and why is it Corapi is the one that told me?
That is bothersome to a lot of us. I think some things were made public that it would have been better not to have been. He had too much investment in his public persona, and when he was deeply wounded, became defensive, it seems to me.
 
Yes, and St. Therese also is attributed with saying, when someone criticized her, “Well, I deserve far worse.”

That’s holiness, no?
Bishop Sheen, in his last public Homily at St Peter’s on Good Friday said something very similar, too, about his suffering. Something like. “Oh yes I have suffered, suffered much, but not as much as I should have”
 
Code:
Believe me, I do it all the time, which I always have to remind myself to keep things in order. God first, God first, etc.
What I meant, is a lot of the tone concerning Corapi about the Mystical Body, is
treating this situation with emotions as if it is a man losing just a job, rather than something occurring within the Church itself; and an otherworldly vocation.
Oh, right. Yes. Thanks for explaining. Well, what if this is true? I can find no evidence to support the title of this thread, that he ever had any intention of “leaving the priesthood”. He said, 'they want me gone, I will be gone". It leaves one with some ambiguity, because it is unclear if it refers to just his present position and faculties, or otherwise. From listening to the messages, he is quite clear that he could not expect his faculties to be retruned, even if he pursued the investigation. I don’t know that much about canon law, and if he could have faculties under another bishop, in another community, etc. It seems to me that, if they can move pedophile priests from parish to parish and continually restore their faculties without resolving previous issues that this is certainly possible.(that has happened numerous times in the area where I live). Perhaps the new policies were designed to prevent that, and he cannot move somewhere else and start fresh with this unresolved case?

What if the accuser dies, or decides to retract her accusation? Can he be restored? I don’t know these things. If this is the case, though, then maybe he has just lost his “job”, and can go elsewhere and function as a priest.
Code:
 Even though, the bishops might be making bad judgements in his case, in studying the lives of the Saints, all these trials, and chastisements occur, there is a spirit of perserverence...a lot of the sentiments in rallying behind a man, as opposed to trusting that the Lord make straight everything in his mercy and justice concerning his children. Even if we won't see it, evidently, What if Fr. Corapi is undergoing a chastisement or a trial?? As well as those involved?
Have you ever studied the life of St. Bernadette?
Yes, and I agree with you. Anyone one with powerful gifts and ministry can expect these kinds of trials. I think they have been increasing in recent years, and he has felt progressively depleted. We don’t know how his relationship with his bishop is, but the fact that he seeks mentorship from the emeritus, rather than the current bishops seems to indicate that he finds more support in that relationship.

I guess the question is, should he allow himself to be silenced because they want to silence him?
I feel as if many of Corapi people are judging the actions of his superiors as if this is some sort of Secular ordeal/injustice, with a manufactured folk hero status.
I quit reading the “fan base” stuff because it was frankly making me a bit nauseated. But I don’t doubt that what you are saying is true. The situation is also complicated by the unusual nature of Corapi as a priest. He does not belong to a religious order, yet he is supervised by a bishop that is not where he lives. He has a very active public ministry, but does very little pastoral work (public dispensation of sacraments). He has also stated repeatedly that he would not make a good parish priest because he does not have the gifts for it. I have never been sure exactly what this means, but it seems clear that he is just not your average priest.
Code:
While it is true administratively, the Church has its own politics within, Jesus will not leave us orphans. Even though hearts may be hardened in the channels of our Church, God has the ear of the servants within too, regarding their faithfulness...so why should Fr. Corapi in his faithfulness, not have an advocate in Christ & the Blessed Mother if he is in the right? :confused:
Given his 20 year track record of faithfulness in this regard, I am going to err on the side of trusting that he does. I think he has some legitimate trust issues with authorities and procedures in the Church, and is being challenged, as all the saints have been, to submit to what seem to him like corrupted leaders while placing his trust in God.
Code:
So he may literally not be a religious order, but all of us in some capacity, must be numb to the world. Indifferent to it, for God's sake. We are to be salt, and light, not blending into the darkness of their ways.
Yes, indeed. But he is being castigated for not “obeying his superior” when he does not have this kind of relationship with SOLT. As a society, not a religious order, the vows are different.
To suggest, that he can still be satisfied or his direction where he feels he might have a new beginning as Black SHeep dog, is trying to keep one foot in the door of the church, while peeking and looking in the next room, in the door of Manna. I don’t want him to do this.
Clearly his ideas about his pen name emerged a couple years before all this fallout. He is straddling a Church identity and that of a secular public speaker. After listening to the many statements he has made about how important the priesthood is to him, I can’t imagine he is anything but devastated to have his faculties removed. I am sure he knew it could happen, but that did nothing to assuage his hurt and anger when it did. It seems to scream out from his messages. The feeling of betrayal and abandonment by those he is counting on for support I hear in the phrase “thrown out like yesterday’s garbage”. It is a phrase he has used before about priests who have been removed from ministry because they were accused.
 
What if God called him to preach for 20 years and wants him to become a contemplative or to humble him? Remember Moses had a talent as leader, and he made a mistake, because of the weakness of his faith, and was shut out of the promised land…he wanted it.
Yes, I have thought of this too, and pray that he is even now considering it. His felt sense of “I am not done yet” seems very strong, but I trust that God, and Holy Mary, through whom he has consecrated all he is and does, will be able to reach him with this call, if it is indeed the case.
Code:
Fulton Sheen had a great calling and charisma, he had both worldly success....and then,
He was humbled. He said he suffered from the sin of vanity, he was pretty much silenced, as many Saintly people, (though I pray for his canonization) undergo jealousy and resentment by their peers. He also had an understanding of offering up that suffering to Christ – Sheen, however, devoted himself the Eucharist so he persevered. And in that, you’ll see the picture, when Fulton Sheen was embraced during at least I believe a whole decade of sorrow, by Pope John Paul II…while his health was deteriorating and he may have anguished over the erosion of our Church too… in a way he literally laid down and died… in his chapel before the Blessed Sacrament…
I believe that Corapi is following the example of this honored mentor of his as well. I think he can still have this devotion, though, while speaking up about the moral deterioration of America. He cannot do it as a priest, but if he feels such a strong conviction that there is more that needs to be said, who am I to say he is not called to say it?
Code:
Every one is a servant, to please God, no servant is greater than his master. Embrace the cross and hug it, with all your heart. Unite yourself with Jesus's work.... Corapi doesn't strike me as if he wants to do that . If we are to serve, or hear  our calling. There will be crosses. And God even said to Peter, you may be led, where you do not want to go.....
If he were to accept permanent suspension of his faculties, and fade into oblivion, would you consider this “embracing the cross”?

I am not sure there is any greater cross for him than to be relieved of his priestly status, and rejected by those who have authority over him.
Code:
 St. Francis of Assisi wanted to be martyred, St. Anthony, St. Theresa of Avila had a will or felt an inspiration to be martyred in Morocco. God had other plans.
Yes. He seems to feel that going into seclusion is equivalent to “lie down and die” and believes he is compelled to speak the Word, be instant in season and out of season. He has said he wants to die with his boots on.

Maybe he is now “out of season” and those in authority want him silenced? Does God have a plan for him outside of Church ministry? The hints are there…he is now “unleashed” to say things politically that he was not free to say before…
Code:
In Fr. Corapi's letter, or Black Sheep Dog, as he rejects the title of father for some reason,
He has not rejected it. By virtue of his admin leave, he has not been allowed to use it since Ash Wed. His book was already in the final stages toward publishing, and he has pursued this under the restrictions that he not hold himself out to the public as a priest.
Code:
 Black Sheep Dog's letter, he laments the persecutions and the sins against him, with resentment. Does he really think it's God's will to go back into marketeering??
Well, he has been “marketing” for many years. He does not get any financial support from SOLT or from the Church, so he has to finance everything he does by himself. This is why I say he is a very unusual priest (there are a lot of reasons, but this status is one).

I would have preferred that he not “lament” in public as he did. Actually, a lamentation would not have been so bad, because anyone who has listened to his talks knows how important it is to him to be a priest, so having this ripped from him must be devastating. However, the blaming part was not helpful.
Code:
Going into some secular format of preaching won't satisfy him.
I have pondered this also. FIrst off, I don’t think being “satisfied” is his goal. I think serving God through his calling is the most important. If he is not allowed to implement his calling through SOLT and under his current bishop, he seems to feel it is critical that he “move on”. His messages also indicate that he has not been “satisified” for several years with his current situation. He seems to feel compelled to speak out about things in a way that the Church confines him not to.
Which is why it’s saddening. I also don’t understand why people have to walk around eggshells, to be blunt about the actions here, but oh well. 🤷
Several threads on this topic have been closed for lack of charity. This man seems to constellate people and a lot of negativity comes out. I personally got a PM full of invective and profanity by a member that did not like my posts.
The truth is hard to hear, must be said. Jesus did not give us a spirit of timidity.
It is interesting you would say this, because I think Corapi feels compelled to speak out the Truth, and that silence would be giving in to timidity. Maybe this is not the case, but it certainly seems that he will need a change of perspective on this point if he is to go into silence and contemplation.
 
He has not rejected it. By virtue of his admin leave, he has not been allowed to use it since Ash Wed. His book was already in the final stages toward publishing, and he has pursued this under the restrictions that he not hold himself out to the public as a priest.
Is this true (re: title of “father”) He is not allowed to use it? I was under the impressing he made the choice of not to use it.

Why would being on admin leave strip him of that?

(Sincere question here. Just looking for factual answers)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top