Listener:
I just saw Father McBrien on 60 minutes. I thought that what he said was just fine. Just because you disagree with someone doesn’t mean you have to put him down. I thought Father McBrien looked happy, peaceful, and joyful - the fruits of the Spirit.
Maybe some of the people on this forum don’t understand that the Church has had married priests in the past (many centuries ago), and has some married priests right now (Episcopalian priests who switched denominations). The Church has within its power to allow married priests without violating any moral law. There is a strong tradition for an all-male priesthood, so the Church probably isn’t going to have women priests any time soon (if ever). If someone speculates about the possibility of female priests, it means that he/she has a different opinion than you do. It doesn’t make them a terrible sinner who should be scorned.
I think he also mentioned that birth control is the least of the Church’s problems. Well, he may be right about that, I don’t know. If birth control was central to our faith, you would think that Jesus or Saint Paul would have said something about it. It is my understanding that a large percentage of Catholics don’t obey the birth control rules, but I don’t know for sure. In any case, the man is a priest and he deserves some respect from us.
In short, I think that Father McBrien did a fine job on 60 minutes.
Whenever a person dissents againts Divine Revelation, that person, by definition, is a sinner. One cannot oppose God and be said not to be in a state of sin. Least there be any doubt about advocating that women should be ordained is sinful, STUDY what the Church has declared on the subject.
CONCERNING THE TEACHING CONTAINED IN ORDINATIO SACERDOTALIS RESPONSUM AD DUBIUM
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith
October 28, 1995
Dubium: Whether the teaching that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women, which is presented in the Apostolic Letter
Ordinatio Sacerdotalis to be held definitively, is to be understood as belonging to the deposit of faith.
Responsum: In the affirmative.
This teaching requires definitive assent, since, founded on the written Word of God, and from the beginning constantly preserved and applied in the Tradition of the Church, it has been set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal Magisterium (cf. Second Vatican Council, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church
Lumen Gentium 25, 2). Thus, in the present circumstances, the Roman Pontiff, exercising his proper office of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32), has handed on this same teaching by a formal declaration, explicitly stating what is to be held always, everywhere, and by all, as belonging to the deposit of the faith.
The Sovereign Pontiff John Paul II, at the Audience granted to the undersigned Cardinal Prefect, approved this Reply, adopted in the ordinary session of this Congregation, and ordered it to be published.
Rome, from the offices of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, on the Feast of the Apostles SS. Simon and Jude, October 28, 1995.
Joseph Card. Ratzinger
Prefect
Tarcisio Bertone
Archbishop Emeritus of Vercelli