Free abortions for all

  • Thread starter Thread starter upant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
U

upant

Guest
It ends when those in favor of legalized abortion die out.
 
Could this be the privileged left outsmarting itself?
  • If all Oregon abortions are free … why would anyone anywhere else PAY for one?
  • So they will come to Oregon for “free abortions”.
  • If the abortions are “free” … does this mean the abortionists won’t be paid?
*If abortionists were unpaid … would they still DO it?

:hmmm: - Of course, the abortionists will probably BE paid for those “free abortions”

And paid a LOT.

And with THAT party running things … the money will come … from CHURCHES (who after all would ONLY be using that money for …:big yikes: … THEIR versions of charity)! < This would BE an absurdist interlude but for the fact that Church groups really HAVE been made to pay for abortions (even when their Church’s teachings forbid it). :mad:

Whoever came up with this “plan” should get a free lobotomy. They’d be happier … and might even think more clearly.

Call them “Oregon donors”. :rolleyes:
 
*If abortionists were unpaid … would they still DO it?

:hmmm: - Of course, the abortionists will probably BE paid for those “free abortions”

And paid a LOT.
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. THAT’S where the big money is. Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
 
CaptFun responds in RED below 🙂
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) < thanks for that happy visual. I can almost imagine an abortionist standing glumly with a street corner sign: “Will abort your child for spare change.” :hmmm: which is still much more than that sort of medicine
is worth compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. < Women are probably exploited THAT way as well due to their vulnerability. :sad_yes: though in THAT case at least the “obscene expenses” are at least mitigated by the “magnificent value” of delivering a human being, with inestimable potential, into the world. THAT’S where the big money is. Oh that those silly abortionists would go on permanent strike and take only HEALING type jobs for more pay (WHICH would be simple justice).

Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Why are bills the answer? Government involvement causes as many problems as it solves sometimes. If MONEY is the KEY thing (it’s not with me actually, but I can speak to the issue) there IS “free childbirth” in many parts of the world. I DO favor more medical help for mothers in labor than just … sympathetic midwives and bare essential assistance.

Expenses need not be racked up astronomically (as they probably are sometimes) … but when they are … it’s often government doing it (or benignly “being taken advantage of”) by the exploiters. IF there’s a new program … and there always IS … maybe it should be more of a quick safety and nurturing thing than a sacred cow gravy train that punishes life givers (parents) as an exercise in social engineering.

Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? < There are already maternity leaves in most places. I favor that. Not so much endless rounds of bigger and better maternity leaves approved each election cycle as an exercise in self-congratulation for each political session. There’s also millions being spent on abortions and mandatory funding of its “providers”.

Serious double standard here. 🤷

I don’t like double standards. Class warfare folk feed on them.
For a more detestable double standard … why is it that there is no room on the planet for “unwanted” unborn children *(who may be killed without a trial, and innocent of any crime - despite absurd rape and incest claims) *… but guilty convicted and violent criminals must be housed, fed and given as much as 40 years of health care … because we are a just and merciful society. < DO this last, and I’m actually OK with the mercy. Abortion? If its not accidental, (i.e.an unintended side effect of trying to save an endangered mother from a life threatening situation - which I wouldn’t CALL abortion) … Just say NO! :nope::crossrc:

Thanks for bring up the “double standards” issue randomuser. It’s a factor we should consider always if we are to be prudent vs. a bit rash or myopic. 👍
 
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. THAT’S where the big money is. Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
Where does personal responsibility fit in this picture? Gee I was raised you get married, get stable jobs, refrain from sex until marriage and then have appropriate insurance and financial resources to raise a child.

Just a wondering.
 
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. THAT’S where the big money is. Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
What are you saying? That we can’t be both pro-life and stay economically sound? We can’t be pro-life unless we support endless handouts for people who do the right thing?
 
It ends when people don’t want abortions (both men and women)
Do you hold the same view with every other law? Why do we even have laws if that’s the case. 🤷

And as always, I bet if it were your life in question it’d be a different story. :rolleyes:
 
Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
Damn straight! :mad: (the ‘mad’ face is in agreement with you, you are dead right here, what a joke!) But as we see, those who are pro-choice are really only pro one particular choice, as they make abortion free and make it harder for people to actually have children, since this suits their de-population agendas fueled by dubious climate change predictions.

Notice too randomuser that it was the Democrats who passed this.

“for the sake of His sorrowful passion, have mercy on us and on the whole world”

I hope this has helped

God Bless You

Thank you for reading
Josh
 
Where does personal responsibility fit in this picture? Gee I was raised you get married, get stable jobs, refrain from sex until marriage and then have appropriate insurance and financial resources to raise a child.

Just a wondering.
👍:clapping:

Unfortunately you belonged to a rare species. How we wish time would roll back to this golden era.
 
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. THAT’S where the big money is. Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
I almost missed my daily reminder that being pro-life means you have to support expanding the welfare state on behalf of women.
 
Actually, it’s a pittance (barely a nickel in a tip jar at a Starbucks) compared to how obscenely expensive deliveries are. THAT’S where the big money is. Where are all the “free childbirth” bills? Where’s the legislation to help protect maternity leave for mothers who choose life? Serious double standard here. 🤷
And this would be an issue if, as the British put it, women simply “fell” pregnant, but they don’t. Women who don’t want to have children have an extremely easy and very inexpensive way of avoiding that: don’t have sex when you are not ready to have a child.

But as it is, we are paying so people can have child-free sex…
 
I almost missed my daily reminder that being pro-life means you have to support expanding the welfare state on behalf of women.
Being pro-life means believing that women and men are unable to care for themselves and require a patriarchal state to provide for them and make all their decisions. I think this is the new feminism too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top