A
anp1215
Guest
No problem. I’m actually going to report that too since it doesn’t make sense now that the other post is gone.Ah, thanks.
No problem. I’m actually going to report that too since it doesn’t make sense now that the other post is gone.Ah, thanks.
I live close to this parish and my pastor is related to the principal of the school. On the way into Mass this morning I heard some parishoners discussing the issue…they are upset. There is a petition being circulated to have Fr. Rowe reinstated. I will not sign it.
- If the abuses mentioned here are true then it’s easy to see what the problem is…liturgical abuse has been allowed for far too long in this and many diocese.
- My pastor is a liberal, but he is making a valid effort to confect the mass according to the rubric of the new missal. Someone state the principal needs to be let go too…on what is that opinion based?
Electric? Licks or chords?plays guitar
Indeed, isn’t it standard practice for priests to submit their resignations at 70 (sort of like bishops do it at 75)? If that is the case, then it seems like the priest was kept on for 2 years after his resignation was submitted. I would hardly call that being punished for a wrong doing, for which he was reprimanded and did not correct. Really if you were an employee, got reprimanded or written up, continued the activity, would you really call it a punishment for being let go 2 years after the fact?I don’t think he was “let go” as the headline proclaims. He’s 72 and the bishop asked for his “resignation” which mostly likely means he resigned as pastor or active ministry. I would assume he is simply retired now. And according to the article he’s collecting an Air Force pension which means he’ll live quite comfortably the rest of his life…