Holly,
Thanks again for the links… Let me share with you my response to part of one… so maybe everyone will have a little better understanding with why we struggle with the Church on this point.
I am a former Seventh-day Adventist… reading much of the claims about Freemasonry is VERY similar to reading the claims about Catholicism by an anti-Catholic group such as Adventism. They are generally filled with partial truths and somewhat exaggerated in my experience.
Here is what the Scripture Catholic page says:
Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity because it promotes indifferentism.
Actually it doesn’t at all. In the first degree I was told to place my duty to God, my country, and my family above all else… including Masonry. I was never asked, instructed, or witnessed anyone claiming that all religions were equal… just that we need to respect all men of all religions. Not a bad thing at all.
Indifferentism is the heretical belief that all religions are equally legitimate attempts to explain the truth about God which, but for the truth of His existence, are unexplainable.
**Again, not really true. Freemasonry does not involve its self in what religions are true or not true… what their value is or is not, and it certainly does not claim that all are equally legitimate. Just that each person must follow his faith in God completely, and we are to respect those of any faith as people, not because they are correct, but because they are people. **
Such a view makes all truths relative and holds that God can be equally pleased with truth and error.
**None of the degree’s that I experienced or read ever make this claim. I have completed all three of the degrees of Freemasonry and was a 32nd Degree Scottish Rite member, as well as a Shriner. **
Because Christians believe that God has definitively revealed Himself in the person of Jesus Christ, and desires that all men come to the knowledge of this truth, indifferentism is incompatible with Christian faith. Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6).
**This is all fine, but since we are not taught what is claimed in the first place… it is straw man argument. **
Freemasonry’s teachings and practices also result in syncretism which is the blending of different religious beliefs into a unified whole. This is evidenced most especially by Masonry’s religious rituals which gather men of all faiths around a common altar, and place all religious writings along side the Bible on the Masonic altar.
**There are no sacraments or religious rituals in Freemasonry… unless one includes prayer? There were no other religious writings on the Altar beside the Bible… we had members who were jewish, Christian, and Mormon. **
This is also demonstrated by the Lodge’s prayers and its unique names and symbols for God and heaven. Syncretism is the logical consequence of indifferentism.
**This is a claim with no substantiation. I suppose the supreme court, congress, high school sports programs, boy scouts, etc are all anti-Catholic because they use generic prayers? Funny I have seen Catholic priests and bishops attend and bow their heads during these functions. **
The Lodge’s practice of requiring its members to swear immoral oaths is also incompatible with Christianity.
**Were the oaths immoral… then yes they would be. **
These oaths require a Christian to swear on the Holy Bible that he will uphold a code of moral conduct that prefers Masons over non-Masons,
**Wrong again… and I have never met a mason who says that they have. We do swear to protect and help a fellow mason if we can, but not at the expense of anyone else. LOL The historical significance of these oaths and the fact that they are only symbolic is also explained so that the candidate can understand them in the context of the historical aspect of the society. **
and to preserve secret passwords and handshakes.
This part is true… we are asked to preserve the means of identification. This is certainly not immoral though… LOL
Such oaths are gravely immoral because their subject matter is trivial or does not give rise to the necessity of an oath.
**Well… like I said… two things are wrong here… First, trivial to who? Second, in my Grand lodge they were symbolic oaths not literal, it was a re-enaction of history. For example before the oath was administered the following was recited to the candidate. **
You are preparing to take upon yourself the oath of this degree. This oath contains certain penalties which are only symbolic and have never been applied to any mason by a duly constituted Masonic authority. Their purpose is for historical and symbolic teaching only. With this assurance on my part, are you willing to proceed and take upon yourself this oath?
These oaths are also sworn under symbolic, blood-curdling penalties of physical torture and death called self-curses (e.g., having my throat cut across, and my tongue torn out by its roots). These penalties show a lack of respect for God and amount to blasphemy which is a serious sin.
LOL… see the paragraph above. In addition, these oaths are not very different than those taken my knights and crusaders of the Catholic Church. God is certainly never disrespected or blasphemed.
So…looking at his review of why masonry is imcompatible with Christianity… I can either take my presonal experience of being there and going through it, or his explanation which is based on hearsay. If I based my decisions on hearsay, I would not be in this Great Church… After all, you know the oaths those Jesuits take.
