Hi BlessedLDS,
Since it seems as if we’re sharing threads, perhaps you might also be interested in reading some things in the following threads:
The Allure of Mormonism-Get Under the Surface
Former Mormon Letter to a CES Director-Great Resource
Mormonism: Restoration of Ancient Christian Church?
Naturally, you’ll have Catholic posters attempting to convince you to come back to Catholicism, and LDS posters congratulating you on deciding to become LDS (have you been baptized?). Similar dynamics occur on LDS forums, Evangelical forums, Hindu forums, etc. Further, you’ll find that members of a “guest religion” on a forum (such as LDS posters here, or Catholic posters over at Mormon Dialogue and Discussion Board) will often feel that critical posts against their religion are negative and have a “tone” that is offensive. I certainly found such to be the case over at MDDB when Catholicism comes up. Now, I do believe that some posters here are a bit more…divisive than necessary, however it’s up to you to read and make your own conclusions.
I’m afraid I’m not following your logic. So, after you read the Book of Mormon, and prayed about it, you realized that you were becoming a better person, so you concluded that Joseph Smith was a prophet, and the Book of Mormon is what it claims to be? I’m not sure that logically follows unfortunately. Many Muslim converts will claim that the Qur’an made them a better person, their addiction to alcohol stopped after practicing the principles of Islam, etc, and Muhammad was therefore a true prophet and the Qur’an a true text of the word of God. So, I do hope that you will do some more in depth research into your new faith.
I personally converted to the LDS faith after being Catholic all my life prior. I was very active in the LDS church, attended all 3 hours of meetings every Sunday (plus linger longers), went to ward FHE, exercised the priesthood (I blessed or passed the Sacrament every week, and was in charge of it for some time, gave blessings, Confirmed someone, set people apart in callings, home teaching, etc), attended the temple regularly (I attended all ward baptisms for the dead trips, then after I was Endowed, I attended the temple once a week for a couple months, then slowed down to at least once a month once I had the “hang” of it. I helped in administering proxy baptisms and confirmations, did proxy Initiatories, Endowments, and sealings), and served in various callings, including Elders Quorum President for the ward. I say all of that just to give you a background of how much I lived and breathed being LDS for a number of years, and loved every moment. I missed certain things about Catholicism, but nothing that made me want to go back.
But after awhile, I began to think more about things that I had put up on the mental shelf for some time. These are things that the missionaries didn’t really have a good answer, and weren’t really things that were talked about in church meetings anyway, at least not in any detail where I could actually understand them. Things such as:
-
the Priesthood Restriction preventing Black males from being ordained to the priesthood, as well as Black males and females from entering the temple, until 1978.
-
The radical difference in the functioning of prophets after Joseph Smith
-
The Temple Endowment and Freemasonry, as well as understanding changes to ordinances (and how that contradicted apologetic arguments against things like pouring baptism.
-Entertaining the belief that
God the Father was once a man that progressed to Godhood, in contrast to the Catholic view that God has always been God, never had to learn to become God, and never was not-God. The belief in the progression of God from man to God cannot be entertained in Catholicism, yet it can be in Mormonism, and has been taught by various LDS prophets, including Joseph Smith.
As much as I loved being LDS, the culture, all of the activities, opportunities to look after each other (at least opportunities that you were “voluntold” to do), emphasis on scripture study, etc, the more I read and thought about it (from both sides), the more I came to realize that the LDS faith really wasn’t what it claimed to be, at least in my view. The prophets (all 15 prophets, seers, and revelators) don’t prophesy, see, nor reveal anything. They don’t function like the Biblical prophets, let alone like Joseph Smith. If you watch General Conference this weekend, you’ll have a chance to listen to all 15 prophets, seers, and revelators speak. They won’t tell you anything new (so much for continuing revelation for the Church). The “open canon” of scripture no longer expands. Gone are the days of canonized revelations, visions, angelic ministrations, etc. The last update, the “official declaration” opening the priesthood to all people, instead of restricting blacks, isn’t even a revelation. It’s merely a declaration that a revelation was received, in 1978. The Book of Mormon has yet to be substantiated as a real, historical account. Sure, there are apologists proclaiming how it fits in Mesoamerica (a book, Mormon’s Codex, recently came out on the matter). But there are also other apologists claiming that it happened elsewhere. The Church itself says nothing and has no opinion.