Z
Zatzat
Guest
Then why was she fed by tube in her stomach?Eyewitnesses to the women state otherwise.
Feeding herself was out of the question, but swallowing food and water was something that she had been doing for some time.
Then why was she fed by tube in her stomach?Eyewitnesses to the women state otherwise.
Feeding herself was out of the question, but swallowing food and water was something that she had been doing for some time.
Convenience perhaps?Then why was she fed by tube in her stomach?
Sorry, I don’t buy it. Everything I’ve read indicate that she was in a persistent vegitative state…meaning she wouldn’t have had the capacity to swallow water food.Convenience perhaps?
Manually feeding her with a spoon would take an exceedingly long time compared to the tube.
Perhaps what you believe is a persistant vegatative state is not what those making the decision consider a persistant vegatative state.Everything I’ve read indicate that she was in a persistent vegitative state…meaning she wouldn’t have had the capacity to swallow water food.
I recall at least one video tape showing her eating.If loving family members made those observations, they were likely either confused or mistaken.
The autopsy proved that she was blind…there eas no eye tracking.Perhaps what you believe is a persistant vegatative state is not what those making the decision consider a persistant vegatative state.
It would not be the first time that people play fast and loose with vocabulary to facilitate an agenda.
I recall at least one video tape showing her eating.
Besides, do you really wish to hang the argument on the idea that these people were mistaken about something as unmistakable as eating?
I would consider them mistaken about a number of things…
Tracking with her eyes as a measure of consciousness…
Saying things…deliberate motions, etc.
All could be read into a great deal by someone that loves her dearly and wants to see something.
But eating is not something you can readily mistake no matter how much love there may be biasing your view.
And yet there was also video to show that she was watching the activity around her.The autopsy proved that she was blind…there eas no eye tracking.
Christopher Reeve had more intrusive means of life support. He would become fatigued breathing on his own for more than half an hour.Sorry, I don’t buy it. Everything I’ve read indicate that she was in a persistent vegitative state…meaning she wouldn’t have had the capacity to swallow water food.
If loving family members made those observations, they were likely either confused or mistaken.