I believe he was.You made the claim that he ws a suspicious character.
I do not need to know Zimmerman’s thoughts for that.
I believe he was.You made the claim that he ws a suspicious character.
On what grounds?I believe he was.
I do not need to justify myself to you.On what grounds?
You don’t any justification to speak in any way at all.I do not need to justify myself to you.
And that is an assumption.So it is OK if you have none.
If you have it and don’t want to post it, that’s OK too…I have sufficient justification.
I have.If you have it and don’t want to post it, that’s OK too…
Indeed. No one needs to post anything,And I need not post it.
How can you say that, you work for the system, you work with young people like this, shouldn’t an 18 year old kicked out of Foster Care still be considered a child? How can you say something like that, you who work with young people in the system?! My other issue with the case was how they dragged his name, a dead young person through the mud, maybe he had some silly Facebook posts and some conflicts as school but who doesn’t?Trayvon wasn’t a ‘child’, he was a muscular 17 yr old. He would appear as an adult.
What’s your justification in thinking Martin was suspicious?And that is an assumption.
I do not answer to you.
I have sufficient justification.
You claim you do not know why he would be considered a suspicious character.
Your ignorance of the justification is not evidence that there is none, it is evidence that you do not know.
That was self-defense and long after Zimmerman decided to leave his car and follow him through the dark raising Martin’s concern that an armed man that was following him.Pounding a guy’s head against the pavement isn’t a crime?
If Martin pounding Zimmerman’s head against concrete was self defense, what is Zimmerman shooting him to stop it?That was self-defense and long after Zimmerman decided to leave his car and follow him through the dark raising Martin’s concern that an armed man that was following him.
Zimmerman was a danger to Martin and Martin knew it and defended himself. It’s a shame that Martin didn’t exercise his Second Amendment rights.If Martin pounding Zimmerman’s head against concrete was self defense, what is Zimmerman shooting him to stop it?
So you where there? Why didn’t you warn Martin? It’s because he was black, right?Zimmerman was a danger to Martin and Martin knew it and defended himself.
That is a conclusion with no evidence.That was self-defense
You do not have sufficient information to form this conclusion and have it taken seriously.Zimmerman was a danger to Martin and Martin knew it and defended himself.
He was being followed through the back of townhouses by an unknown armed man that ended up killing him. Yeah, Zimmerman was a danger to Martin and Martin knew it.So you where there? Why didn’t you warn Martin? It’s because he was black, right?
He was being followed through the dark by an armed man. Of course, he had the right to defend himself from a dangerous man.That is a conclusion with no evidence.
He was being followed, did NOT know if the other party was armed, and had no right to attack.He was being followed through the dark by an armed man. Of course, he had the right to defend himself from a dangerous man.
Sorry, it isn’t relevant.Now, I am waiting for you to tell me why you think Martin was suspicious.