Gingrich Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Gingirch surge fizzled because he lost the favor of the media. It happened to Perry, it happened to Bachmann, and it happened to Cain. Santorum is currently the darling, explaining why he’s getting such good poll numbers now. It’s not anything that he’s doing or his positions (because you and I all know that most voters don’t even know his positions or his past), it’s that the media has decided that he is the new guy to prop up.

The way the media controls the election really is disturbing. My recommendation? Don’t listen to the media. Research positions yourself: avoid TV news, talk radio, online articles, etc., and just do your own research from independent sources.
I disagree. The media is following not leading. Santorum is getting the press because of his surge in Iowa. Prior to that surge, the media dismissed him as having no chance.
 
No, he mentioned something about blacks and food stamps.
I found the quote and I wish that there was more context, but here it is.

“I’m prepared, if the NAACP invites me, I’ll go to their convention and talk about why the African American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied with food stamps.]”

I don’t know what to say. The media seems to attack him without analyzing the position or giving much context. I’ll reserve judgment until I get more context and I see stats for blacks as compared to other groups about food stamp usage. Clearly the racist charge is premature.
 
I disagree. The media is following not leading. Santorum is getting the press because of his surge in Iowa. Prior to that surge, the media dismissed him as having no chance.
How do you explain the meager crowds he drew in Iowa, but his tremendous poll numbers?
 
I found the quote and I wish that there was more context, but here it is.

“I’m prepared, if the NAACP invites me, I’ll go to their convention and talk about why the African American community should demand paychecks and not be satisfied with food stamps.]”

I don’t know what to say. The media seems to attack him without analyzing the position or giving much context. I’ll reserve judgment until I get more context and I see stats for blacks as compared to other groups about food stamp usage. Clearly the racist charge is premature.
The majority of food stamp recipients are white–as are the majority of recipients of all federal aid. The majority of food stamp recipients have a job, but don’t earn enough to be out of poverty. The reason that the NAACP is upset is that Newt’s comment seems to suggest a number of false racial stereotypes, including that black people prefer receiving federal assistance to having a job.
 
The majority of food stamp recipients are white–as are the majority of recipients of all federal aid. The majority of food stamp recipients have a job, but don’t earn enough to be out of poverty. The reason that the NAACP is upset is that Newt’s comment seems to suggest a number of false racial stereotypes, including that black people prefer receiving federal assistance to having a job.
Afrcian Amercians make up 12% of the population but 34% of welfare recipients.
Whites make of 31% of welfare recipients.

acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/character/FY2008/tab08.htm
 
The majority of food stamp recipients are white–as are the majority of recipients of all federal aid. The majority of food stamp recipients have a job, but don’t earn enough to be out of poverty. The reason that the NAACP is upset is that Newt’s comment seems to suggest a number of false racial stereotypes, including that black people prefer receiving federal assistance to having a job.
A full-time job?
 
How do you explain the meager crowds he drew in Iowa, but his tremendous poll numbers?
The crowds we saw, large or small, were the crowds the MSM deemed to show us. Apparently enough people saw and/or heard his message to put him in second place.
 
Was it his comment about how Social Security disproportionately is a bad investment for blacks because they have the shortest life spans? I heard that recently, but I didn’t know if it was a recent statement. I hope he’s not getting called a racist on that issue, because it’s actually a real issue.
The MSM knows that their devout followers will not stop to analyze the issue or the statement. They will swallow whatever position the press puts out there, especially if it fits their preconceived ideas.
 
So do you agree with Gingrich that black people are happier to take hand outs than to work for a living?
Happier? Can’t say. More prone and eager to, that much is obvious.
 
Black people are eager to take hand outs rather than work? That may be the most appalling thing I have seen posted here, which is saying something.
I know. Its aweful, isn’t it. We really need to do something about it.
 
My question is who he was trying to appeal to by making that statement in front of an overwhelmingly white audience in an overwhelmingly white state like New Hampshire? Many blacks likened his comments in that setting to the “Southern Strategy” or the Willie Horton ads.
 
My question is who he was trying to appeal to by making that statement in front of an overwhelmingly white audience in an overwhelmingly white state like New Hampshire? Many blacks likened his comments in that setting to the “Southern Strategy” or the Willie Horton ads.
I know this is where we are all supposed to flee in terror yelling “I am not a racist” over our shoulders but the turth is playing the “race card” has little or no effect anymore. I am not going to be baited into participating insuch a silly discussion.
 
I know this is where we are all supposed to flee in terror yelling “I am not a racist” over our shoulders but the turth is playing the “race card” has little or no effect anymore. I am not going to be baited into participating insuch a silly discussion.
That’s fine, I did not ask you to do that.

However, several discussions on this forum ask why more blacks do not support the Republican party. Statements such as Gingrich’s rub a large number of blacks the wrong way. If the Republican Party is going to attract more black voters, they will have to start by not making racially charged statements.
 
He didnt say that. I was correcting your incorrect statement .
Well, whatever Gingrich meant by it, you can see from the above exchange that at least some of the regular posters here do agree with that statement. I suppose that is the crowd that Gingrich is trying to appeal to.
 
That’s fine, I did not ask you to do that.

However, several discussions on this forum ask why more blacks do not support the Republican party. Statements such as Gingrich’s rub a large number of blacks the wrong way. If the Republican Party is going to attract more black voters, they will have to start by not making racially charged statements.
So just how has lockstep support of the Democratic Party work out for African-Americans last 50 years?

I do not want Republican Party to play racial politics. They should push policies that are best for the country, not playing ethnic groups , races and genders .off against each other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top