Girl Altar Serviers

  • Thread starter Thread starter tafan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
One must remember that the decision of whether to allow females to be altar servers is one that has multiple levels. The allowance is given by the diocesan bishop. The pastor of the parish then can decide whether to allow them in his parish. Then, the individual priest celebrating the Mass is the final person who needs to give permission for females to serve.
 
I do not think girls have any place serving on the altar. After all, they will never be priests, so it’s a dead-end position. Gives them the wrong idea about what women’s place is, within the Church, as well.
 
In the west it will eventually, if only for the reason that more orthodox catholics will have more children, and thus eventually outbreed those who do not follow Church teachings…
Not only that, but the priests that are produced by such families carry the same tradiional philosophy.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, my parish, which has boys exclusively as altar servers, has had 12 men ordained in the last 10 years.

Because of that, the number of parishes that are have only altar BOYS, has increased from 5 to 8 in the last two years. This is because the priests are becoming pastors of their own parishes, have personally experienced the value of having only boys as their altar servers.
 
It is more than “an original purpose”, it has been shown that serving at the altar encourages priestly vocations. That comes directly from the Vatican

Indeed, the obligation to support groups of altar boys will always remain, not least of all due to the well known assistance that such programs have provided since time immemorial in encouraging future priestly vocations (cf. ibid.)

A great example is my own parish. We have only altar boys, and that has been true for at least the last decade since the pastor has been here.

Out of a parish of about 950 families, we have 1-2 men from our parish go into the seminary each year. We have had 12 men from our parish ordained to the priesthood in the last 10 years. We have 4 in the seminary right now, at various stages, which is actually a record low 😛 2 are studying for the diocesan priesthood, and two for the priesthood in religious life.

The record of similarly sized parishes in our Archdiocese (or even those that are much larger) that have altar girls, is substantially less.

Bruce, what size is your parish, and how many men have been ordained from your parish in the last several years?
Its St. Andrews Cathedral in Victoria, BC…and yeah we do have a few ordinations a year…but I haven’t counted them…that is an interesting point…should get the numbers…

Cheerz

Bruce
 
The Jesus I worship is God, He is not limited, He is Omnipotent!
You are referring to Jesus Christ…not Jesus of Nazareth. I agree with your statements and those are reserved for the Christ. When I say Jesus was limited I refer to his human form and his socio-cultural and economic position in 1st century Israel…he of course would follow tradition in this patriarchial society…that does not meant that truth was limited by a patriarchial format…that’s all I am saying…your view above is well respected by me and I share with you that view of Jesus Christ.

Bruce
 
More like a step in the wrong direction because as another poster have said, it can’t lead to priesthood so what is the point? according to Gospels there wasn’t any sort of female co-leadership(using your phrase) in the church
Not all male alter servers lead to the priesthood either…so what is the point? The church allows them…are we saying that having females as altar servers doesn’t enhance their spiritual lives? These are the same females that we unleash out into the secular world. If we want them to grow towards a vocation of religious life or marriage…a marriage where they will be bringing up our future priests and deacons…then how could any enrichment of their spiritual lives hurt?
 
Not all male alter servers lead to the priesthood either…so what is the point? The church allows them…are we saying that having females as altar servers doesn’t enhance their spiritual lives? These are the same females that we unleash out into the secular world. If we want them to grow towards a vocation of religious life or marriage…a marriage where they will be bringing up our future priests and deacons…then how could any enrichment of their spiritual lives hurt?
:clapping:
 
I’ve heard many people complain about the gender equality in the church. I would ask you, would you have complained to Jesus? Would you have said to him, “Why are your twelve chosen only male? Isn’t that inequality?”

I don’t believe the Church treats women badly. I do believe that certain jobs have been set in place for certain genders and it is not our place to change that.

God decided only women can be mothers.
God decided (through the person of Jesus) only men would be Apostles.
God decided to found this Church.

Who am I to question how things are?

It worked for 2000 years… why should we presume we know better?
Hi Nicky. We go round in circles on this one; Jesus of Nazareth was limited to his time and tradition. Did Jesus anywhere in scripture say that women should not be priests or that alter service was limited to boys. These are church rules. Many church rules have been dropped over the centuries because they are no longer useful for the times. I think limiting alter service to just boys may have worked well in the past…but we have a different understanding these days of gender and there is nothing to stop girls in being alter servers.

We all are part of a universal communion and therefore we all have the right to question things, not in a way that is detrimental but in a manner that is reflective and reconciles issues as they come up decade by decade. I think that we can assume to bring different light to the original questions of tradition and we can presume to propose new ways of thinking that honour the spirit of the tradition without being bound in the literal meaning or the forms that no longer speak to our generation…

Stuff like that … 🙂

Bruce
 
Not all male alter servers lead to the priesthood either…so what is the point? The church allows them…are we saying that having females as altar servers doesn’t enhance their spiritual lives? These are the same females that we unleash out into the secular world. If we want them to grow towards a vocation of religious life or marriage…a marriage where they will be bringing up our future priests and deacons…then how could any enrichment of their spiritual lives hurt?
We’re not talking about their spiritual lives. This has got to do with tradition, vocations, and the masculinity of the sanctuary. The fact is, altar serving is the pool for priestly vocations in the Church. Girl altar servers started as an act of disobedience, probably fuelled by the want for women prysts by the feminists.
 
Jesus was limited to his time and place and we ought to leave Jesus of Nazareth in that time and place. Would Jesus “the Christ” be limited to our human form which includes our socio-cultural context?

Again, Jesus, yes he was a man - Jesus of Nazareth…but who does the priest represent or is “personal Christi”…I believe “Christ” is a different concept than Jesus of Nazareth…so even there we have some arguements in favour of women priesthood…in the nature of the Christ not the limits of Jesus of Nazareth

Bruce
You’re essentially positing the Arian heresy. I just want to make that point. Do you believe Jesus Christ was fully divine? That He was God made flesh, and that he was just as much God as the Father was or the Holy Spirit?

“we ought to leave Jesus of Nazareth in that time and place”

Oh, so in other words Christianity should stop caring about Jesus Christ?

I’m sorry, that statement is so wrong, I’m going to refrain from saying anything.

“we ought to leave Jesus of Nazareth in that time and place”

Why don’t you tell that to any Catholic priest and see what they have to say to you.
 
Jesus was fully God and fully MAN. Get over it. No matter how hard you want to hope for it, Jesus will never change to a woman and his Apostles will never become women.
Yeah, I don’t want to get banned for yelling “heretic” at anyone. But, what trickster has said is the textbook definition of someone that believes in Arianism. And, the Catholic Church doesn’t call it “Arianism”, they call it “the Arian heresy”. Just like they don’t say “Albigensianism” they say “the Albigensian heresy”

Albigensianism doesn’t even register as a word. So that proves my point.

hudson just reacted the same way I would… state the truth: Jesus was fully God and fully man. Because He was God, He knew his actions would affect the Church for as long as the Church would be around. He knew feminism would happen, and He didn’t appoint a single woman.

But, of course, you’re claiming that Jesus was limited. Which… I’m just shocked. Is that what they teach in your Church? I’m shocked that there are Christians that believe Jesus Christ was limited… that He didn’t know society would change.
 
Yeah, I don’t want to get banned for yelling “heretic” at anyone. But, what trickster has said is the textbook definition of someone that believes in Arianism. And, the Catholic Church doesn’t call it “Arianism”, they call it “the Arian heresy”. Just like they don’t say “Albigensianism” they say “the Albigensian heresy”

Albigensianism doesn’t even register as a word. So that proves my point.
Semper. Arianism is a belief that says Jesus was not fully God…and if you read my postings you will clearly see that is not what I am saying. I am saying that Jesus had pre-existence, an existence in the form of Jesus of Nazareth (the incarnation) and Jesus the Christ, the Cosmic everlasting Jesus of all time. The entire nature of Jesus has been the same always, he is everlasting and that my friend is basic catholic teaching.

What I was pointing out is that the Jesus of Nazareth was more likely to be limited to human limits, and he operated in the Hebrew culture of the first century therefore he chose men as his partners in the work that the Father needed him to do…but are we limited to that socio-cultural aspect of Jesus of Nazareth…that is more proper my question when Jesus the Christ might be more open to female alter girls and perhaps even priests…

Cheerz.

Bruce Ferguson
 
You’re essentially positing the Arian heresy. I just want to make that point. Do you believe Jesus Christ was fully divine? That He was God made flesh, and that he was just as much God as the Father was or the Holy Spirit?

“we ought to leave Jesus of Nazareth in that time and place”

Oh, so in other words Christianity should stop caring about Jesus Christ?

I’m sorry, that statement is so wrong, I’m going to refrain from saying anything.

“we ought to leave Jesus of Nazareth in that time and place”

Why don’t you tell that to any Catholic priest and see what they have to say to you.
Hmm…not sure why people are shocked at that statement…I learned about it in Catholic theology course where our professor is an Oblate priest as well…so I’m not being radical by any means…perhaps I am not finding the right words to express what I am getting at…so we’ll keep trying… 🙂

Bruce
 
How many of you see any usefulness in having girl altar servers? Do you like it or not?
Two different questions.
  1. I don’t really like it when we have girls as altar servers.
  2. I recognize that there are some occassions where it might be useful to use girls. Example, we have a special Mass planned for the youth group. Almost all the boy altar servers are in the group. If we didn’t have girls serving at the altar, we would not have enough boys. (VERY small parish) However, I prefer that this be the exception rather than the rule.
 
Hmm…not sure why people are shocked at that statement…I learned about it in Catholic theology course where our professor is an Oblate priest as well…so I’m not being radical by any means…perhaps I am not finding the right words to express what I am getting at…so we’ll keep trying… 🙂

Bruce
Did you go to St. Paul’s by any chance?
 
Semper. Arianism is a belief that says Jesus was not fully God…and if you read my postings you will clearly see that is not what I am saying. I am saying that Jesus had pre-existence, an existence in the form of Jesus of Nazareth (the incarnation) and Jesus the Christ, the Cosmic everlasting Jesus of all time. The entire nature of Jesus has been the same always, he is everlasting and that my friend is basic catholic teaching.

What I was pointing out is that the Jesus of Nazareth was more likely to be limited to human limits, and he operated in the Hebrew culture of the first century therefore he chose men as his partners in the work that the Father needed him to do…but are we limited to that socio-cultural aspect of Jesus of Nazareth…that is more proper my question when Jesus the Christ might be more open to female alter girls and perhaps even priests…

Cheerz.

Bruce Ferguson
Jesus did things that flew in the face of the religious laws of his time. If he had wanted to call women to be apostles he would have done so.
 
Not all male alter servers lead to the priesthood either…so what is the point?
And not all jet fighter pilots become astronauts, but that is where they recruit astronauts from, don’t they?

If one wants a larger pool to recruit astronauts from, it helps to make sure there is a large pool of well trained jet fighter pilots.
These are the same females that we unleash out into the secular world. If we want them to grow towards a vocation of religious life or marriage…a marriage where they will be bringing up our future priests and deacons…then how could any enrichment of their spiritual lives hurt?
Lets take a look at the Saints. Almost all of the male saints were, at some point, altar boys.

Of all the female Saints, none were.

So we can see from that that female spirtual development is not hindered in anyway by not being altar servers.

While, at the same time, we can see that it has a profound affect on male spirituality.
 
I think that spirituality informed by female experience has an important place at the altar. At the altar we are participating again in the sacrifice of Our Lord and it seems to me that women were the last to leave the cross when Jesus was actually sacrificed. This church has far too long oppressed women with respect to playing a co-leadership role in the liturgy. So, I feel strongly that the acceptance of alter girls is a small step in the right direction.

Bruce
lame :rolleyes:
 
What bothers me is when both boys and girls are serving at the same Mass. They are at the age where they seem to flirt and get silly. At least this is my experience. The boys should be paired with boys, the girls with girls.
 
What bothers me is when both boys and girls are serving at the same Mass. They are at the age where they seem to flirt and get silly. At least this is my experience. The boys should be paired with boys, the girls with girls.
I have never witnessed boy and girl alter servers seeming to flirt and get silly during Mass and I assume no one else has either. This thread is meant by the OP (as far as I understand) to be an exchange of ideas about girls serving at the alter. Please respect that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top