Global Climate Disruption

  • Thread starter Thread starter markbrumbaugh
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

markbrumbaugh

Guest
"From the administration that brought you “man-caused disaster” and “overseas contingency operation,” another terminology change is in the pipeline.

The White House wants the public to start using the term “global climate disruption” in place of “global warming” – fearing the latter term oversimplifies the problem and makes it sound less dangerous than it really is.

White House science adviser John Holdren urged people to start using the phrase during a speech last week in Oslo, echoing a plea he made three years earlier. Holdren said global warming is a “dangerous misnomer” for a problem far more complicated than a rise in temperature. "

foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/16/white-house-global-warming-global-climate-disruption/

FAR MORE COMPLICATED…*far more complicated *
(do this like the little kid on “The Middle.”)
 
With those for whom there is no God, man is therefore the cause of all good and bad. There is something for the government to control in the good, but something greater to tax in the bad.
 
Anyone who still thinks “global warming” is an actual issue, or even a reality in the first place, go check out the 1.5 hour long special on Real Catholic TV. A lot of what was talked about I already knew, but what was surprising was the way the hype over a FAKE “catastrophe” was linked directly to Eugenics and population control.

The elite need to control the population, and apparently contraception and abortion isn’t quite as effective as it could be. Their thought process is like this:
  • Introduce an idea of world wide disaster caused by humans based on terrible science.
  • Convince people that this man-made disaster is a tremendous imminent threat.
  • Make laws that move the agenda forward, such as “Cap and Trade.”
  • Label common things like plastic, gasoline, and Incandescent bulbs as “bad.”
  • Guilt people into buying hybrid cars, CFL lights (with mercury yay), and other things.
  • Convince people that humanities presence on the Earth is a bad thing.
  • Follow that up with the idea that the less people there are, the less carbon is produced.
  • Promote the use of contraceptives and abortion to help lower the population.
  • Promote the agenda of “global warming” in schools and other places so as to indoctrinate people at a young age, and make them believe that global warming is an established fact.
To all Catholics, DO SOME RESEARCH! Global warming is a blind fold, and we are going to walk off a cliff if we don’t educate ourselves. I am literally sick of my friends telling me about their latest environmental project in school, and talking about how they are saving the planet. It’s a load of BS! They’re not saving the planet, they are moving forward an agenda. The same agenda that is behind the mass killings of the unborn, and the stifling of life through contraception.
 
Well, see, they have to keep re-inventing themselves. First it was " global warming " then it became “climate change” now this.

There is something more sinister going on . Its all a distrasction while they actually push there sneaky conniving infiltrating left wing agenda.

Yes check out realcatholictv.com where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed
 
JRPO said:
Well, see, they have to keep re-inventing themselves. First it was " global warming " then it became “climate change” now this.

There is something more sinister going on . Its all a distrasction while they actually push there sneaky conniving infiltrating left wing agenda.

Yes check out realcatholictv.com where lies and falsehoods are trapped and exposed
Click to expand...
Uh. Just went and made an account, can’t really tell where to go from here…though…I did a search on ‘global warming’ and nothing came up…
 
I don’t know that they really mean “global climate disruption” in its most literal sense, since not all the glob is “disrupted” in the same way at the same time, or even disrupted at all.

Therefore, I conclude that they intend to convey that it is “other than expected”. I can therefore report that last week I personally witnessed “global climate disruption”. It rained cats and dogs, without being forecast, and then that, itself, got disrupted because it cleared up.
 
September 15, 2010
Arctic sea ice reaches annual minimum extent
Arctic sea ice appears to have reached its annual minimum extent on 10 September. The minimum ice extent was the third-lowest in the satellite record, after 2007 and 2008, and continues the trend of decreasing summer sea ice
Click to expand...
nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
 
Ridgerunner said:
I don’t know that they really mean “global climate disruption” in its most literal sense, since not all the glob is “disrupted” in the same way at the same time, or even disrupted at all.

Therefore, I conclude that they intend to convey that it is “other than expected”. I can therefore report that last week I personally witnessed “global climate disruption”. It rained cats and dogs, without being forecast, and then that, itself, got disrupted because it cleared up.
Click to expand...
How about global terrain disruption via unexplained and unpredictable earthquakes? Could they be triggered by the increased weight of the growing human population causing tectonic plates to shift? I mean, too much human development has even threatened to capsize islands! Something must be done!
 
po18guy said:
How about global terrain disruption via unexplained and unpredictable earthquakes? Could they be triggered by the increased weight of the growing human population causing tectonic plates to shift? I mean, too much human development has even threatened to capsize islands! Something must be done!
Click to expand...
It’s worse than that. Two centuries ago, herds of millions of buffalo roamed from south to north on the Great Plains during the summer, and from north to south during the winter. That kept the North American continent balanced, like a kid standing in the center of a seesaw, shifting his weight first to this side, then to that. Now, of course, a fairly equal number of cattle are on those plains, but they don’t roam from Texas to Canada and back anymore, thus destroying the “boy balancing on the seesaw effect”.

I would say we’re in a heap of trouble. :eek:
 
Ridgerunner said:
It’s worse than that. Two centuries ago, herds of millions of buffalo roamed from south to north on the Great Plains during the summer, and from north to south during the winter. That kept the North American continent balanced, like a kid standing in the center of a seesaw, shifting his weight first to this side, then to that. Now, of course, a fairly equal number of cattle are on those plains, but they don’t roam from Texas to Canada and back anymore, thus destroying the “boy balancing on the seesaw effect”.

I would say we’re in a heap of trouble. :eek:
Click to expand...
Dude you have it wrong, man. For like thousands of years, we had lots of sod on the great plains, and then the farmers came in and busted it, and our side of the planet got lighter.

That’s why there’s less sod to keep the see saw man.
 
Ridgerunner said:
It’s worse than that. Two centuries ago, herds of millions of buffalo roamed from south to north on the Great Plains during the summer, and from north to south during the winter. That kept the North American continent balanced, like a kid standing in the center of a seesaw, shifting his weight first to this side, then to that. Now, of course, a fairly equal number of cattle are on those plains, but they don’t roam from Texas to Canada and back anymore, thus destroying the “boy balancing on the seesaw effect”.

I would say we’re in a heap of trouble. :eek:
Click to expand...
Oddly enough, the radio station my son is listening to just played Nugent’s Great White Buffalo as bumper music…
 
Alexander_Smith said:
Their thought process is like this:
  • Introduce an idea of world wide disaster caused by humans based on terrible science.
  • Convince people that this man-made disaster is a tremendous imminent threat.
  • Make laws that move the agenda forward, such as “Cap and Trade.”
  • Label common things like plastic, gasoline, and Incandescent bulbs as “bad.”
  • Guilt people into buying hybrid cars, CFL lights (with mercury yay), and other things.
  • Convince people that humanities presence on the Earth is a bad thing.
  • Follow that up with the idea that the less people there are, the less carbon is produced.
  • Promote the use of contraceptives and abortion to help lower the population.
  • Promote the agenda of “global warming” in schools and other places so as to indoctrinate people at a young age, and make them believe that global warming is an established fact.
Click to expand...
Link, please.
 
NotCrazyDan said:
Dude you have it wrong, man. For like thousands of years, we had lots of sod on the great plains, and then the farmers came in and busted it, and our side of the planet got lighter.

That’s why there’s less sod to keep the see saw man.
Click to expand...
What was it that Jeannine Garafalo (sp?) said before Desert Storm I, when she predicted the wholesale slaughter of Allied troops at the hands of Saddam’s army? We’re doomed! DOOMED!

She said it with a quavery voice, which I can’t duplicate in print, so understand it to be quavery, and applicable to the wobble we induced into the earth’s spin by the farmers’ having removed the sod.
 
Ridgerunner said:
What was it that Jeannine Garafalo (sp?) said before Desert Storm I, when she predicted the wholesale slaughter of Allied troops at the hands of Saddam’s army? We’re doomed! DOOMED!

She said it with a quavery voice, which I can’t duplicate in print, so understand it to be quavery, and applicable to the wobble we induced into the earth’s spin by the farmers’ having removed the sod.
Click to expand...
Dude, she probably got that quiver in her voice because she was so in tune with the earth, her voice was like, connected, to the see saw wobble effect.
 
markbrumbaugh said:
How long have we had satellite records? The lowest in say 30 years means NOTHING compared to the billions of years the earth has been in existance.
The ice may continue to melt until we start another ice age. Then the cycle will repeat itself AGAIN.
Click to expand...
With any luck at all, I’ll be dead before the polar bears cross the Missouri River.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top