I already made an argument for this, so I repeat: God in state of timeless has the knowledge of all states of creation. Only one of these state is actual at current time in temporal perspective. This means that God needs to have extra knowledge, current time, for sustaining the creation. This knowledge however changes which means that God cannot have this knowledge hence he cannot sustain the creation.
Yes. Please read post #140.
I am not talking about present in the first argument.
Just curious where does an omniscient (all knowing) being find this “extra knowledge”? Doesn’t the definition of omniscient mean “the capacity to know everything that there is to know”?
You wrote: “Only one of this state is actual in temporal perspective.”
The issue here is that you are thinking on such a small scale that it’s hindering you from grasping a simple idea that points to something more powerful than anything that can be imagined. So powerful, in fact, that power and imagination (both confined by time) themselves exist because God chooses to hold them in existence. We cannot possibly understand, because there are so many things that our human incapable of understanding. It’s not in our nature to understand in this world. More will be revealed to us in the Beatific Vision, but even then, we are limited in relation to God so much so that merely beholding the raw Nature of God would end your life on earth. You cannot define God on your terms, because your terms cannot hold God. The term “current time” is entirely irrelevant to God because He holds all of time. Saying He doesn’t know an aspect about time is to state the impossible, and only highlights our comparatively puny nature.
Aside from your seeming lack of appreciation of the block time of general relativity, you also seem unacquainted with the work of Julian Barbour.
And, even more egregiously, you seem not to know one of the signal facts about the nature differential equations:
No, just no. Knowledge of even the most minute and infinitesimal part of the solution of a differential equation (or system of differential equations) suffices for a complete description of the whole.
That is correct. An omniscient being could know everything if he is not bound within timeless framework and he is changeable. The knowledge of tensed fact changes so God cannot have it.
The fact that God is outside of time provide a valid argument that he cannot know the knowledge of changeable things.
You can assume that God is omniscient so he could know everything including the knowledge of changeable things unless you assume that God is changeless.
Yes.
I didn’t assume that time is real. I just said that one of the state is actual and it changes. You can have changes in B theory of time.
I can still argue based on facts that I understand. In fact we can say a lot.
There are no real changes, so no change is what is real, God.
I think this is the point I can not grasp. Maybe you could explain it further in another way. How exactly is God bound within a timeless framework? We believe Jesus is God (Trinity), therefore he has proven he is not bound within a timeless framework when he came to earth. That is the part I fail to understand.
Still don’t get it. In my mind someone that is on the outside looking in over the entire room has a much clearer picture than someone that is on the inside looking around the room.
Did you mean “can’t” and I would ask why? Also, what do you mean by changeless?
I don’t understand you.
The B-theory of time, also called the static theory, implies that a property of occurring in the past now or future is a subjective relation between the event and us. It makes reference to our own perspective on the world. There are no objective distinctions among past, present and future.
We can divide any knowledge into changeable and changeless. The knowledge of state of creation is changeable whereas the knowledge who I am is changeless. God cannot have the knowledge of changeable things knowing the fact that he is changeless and the knowledge is changeable.
He dwells in timeless framework.
That as you noticed is a serious problem. Jesus for example cannot decide as a human being since he is divine and he knows what he is supposed to do.
That is not a good analogy.
By changeless I mean something without change.
Striving to B theory of time does not resolve the problem: All states of creation are actual in God’s perspective whereas only one of the state is actual in our perspective.
Sorry I just don’t get it. Could someone else, as well as Bahman, please respond to this and show me the error of my ways.
Yeah that’s how I would do it. 
That makes no sense with respect to b-theory of time in which creation is static, a four dimensional world, which is both timeless and changeless.