R
Ridgerunner
Guest
Undoubtedly this is true for many. But lower-earning men can have an advantage in the economic part of a marriage to a degree that higher-earning women, generally, do not. Men can be extremely “low maintenance”, financially, particularly if they do not have demanding professional “appearance” requirements.No one wants to admit it, but there are a considerable percentage of men who realistically have no hope of finding wives who would respect them enough to stay loyal to them and founding families they could fight for
If a husband puts his entire check into the family “till” and takes virtually nothing out, the family economics will be enhanced and his contribution will be more valued than if he self-indulges.
I remember a story I read once about a Jewish laborer in some European country. His earnings were barely enough to keep the family alive and his work was very hard, with very long hours. When he got home from work every day, he simply collapsed with exhaustion and fell asleep. His wife would tell the children not to disturb him, reminding them that he sacrificed much so they could live. Rather than disdain his inactivity, they should honor it.
I never forgot that story, and thought then and now that a husband and father should always strive to emulate that Jewish laborer as much as he could. It would be hard, I think, for a $200,000/year physician wife to have much problem with a $40,000/year husband who sacrificed his entire effort for his family.
One thinks of St. Joseph, whose only tangible reward in life was knowing his life efforts aided and sustained the lives of those who were greater than himself. It is, I think, because we do not follow the Gospel and see Christ in others that we do not emulate St. Joseph.
Last edited: