They want to reel in three hundred million guns? That’s going to make the effort to kill all the pot plants look like child’s play.they have been quite clear through the years. they will push an incremental ban until they have a total ban.
The Supreme Court has not seen fit to recognize a right to own machine guns, so the federal government has had free reign to infringe that one all day long.it says the right of the people to keep bear arms shall not be infringed. it doesn’t place any limits on the right.
read their writingsThey want to reel in three hundred million guns? That’s going to make the effort to kill all the pot plants look like child’s play.
the supreme court has been wrong before.The Supreme Court has not seen fit to recognize a right to own machine guns, so the federal government has had free reign to infringe that one all day long.
I don’t think PetraG was implying it is. All she said was SCOTUS hasn’t overturned FOPA. Has it been challenged in a court of law? Honest question.The Supreme Court is not infallible.
Go after that person then and leave my rifles alone.Im sure yours won’t. But someone else’s might.
That is why we have laws against murder. The undesirable behavior is already outlawed.These things aren’t like stereos where the abuse of one is just an annoyance. When rifles are abused people die.
Large groups of people easily swayed by emotion are yet another good reason to own guns.This is why fewer and fewer people support your views with each additional mass shooting.
There’s an economy to this and it is swinging against those with your views. Praise God.
read their writings
You’re the one who contends there is an unfettered right.the supreme court has been wrong before.
laws don’t define right and wrong, just what is acceptable to those who made the lawsYou’re the one who contends there is an unfettered right.
There is evidence you are wrong–that is, because the first National Firearms Act which regulated firearms was enacted in 1934 and was only the first of many laws regulating firearms.
Yes. Darndest thing about those laws, really: you actually have to enforce them.Government always involves the use of force.
When the abuse of that “right” creates more damage than it’s worth, then it needs to be curtailed.When you use that force to infringe on my rights, that is evil.
When Minority Report’s “Pre-Crime” becomes a reality, we’ll do that.Go after that person then and leave my rifles alone.
We don’t want to punish the man that slaughters a load of innocents nearly as much as we want to keep him from being able to carry out the act in the first place.That is why we have laws against murder. The undesirable behavior is already outlawed.
Yeah, like fear-baiting the gun-toting NRA crowd.Large groups of people easily swayed by emotion…
Oh sweet lord…So are you willing to kill me over my possession of a rifle?
Yup. The Brits and Aussies are still stacking the bodies from people resisting their gun restrictions.That is what enforcement will entail.
Yeah, the tech was very new. When was the first even made? the Maxim gun in the 1880s?Even before fully automatic weapons were outlawed, they were rarely used to commit crimes.
Or an absolutely phenomenal idea.It was just another instance of a knee jerk reaction by society.
Ah, so you are suggesting that your right to own a machine gun is God-given?was enacted in 1934 and was only the first of many laws regulating firearms.
laws don’t define right and wrong, just what is acceptable to those who made the laws
as someone above said. abortion is legal but it is not right.
the right as written is unfettered no matter how it is later interpreted.
No I didn’t. You’re just trying to spin as hard as you can because you’ve lost the moral upper hand and it’s painfully obvious…You just admitted that you wanted to take our rifles. It seems like that fear is rooted in reality.
are they really outlawed or just scarce and super regulated to own. you can’t buy a new one but you can buy an old one.Even before fully automatic weapons were outlawed, they were rarely used to commit crimes. It was just another instance of a knee jerk reaction by society.
the God-given right of self-defense allows one to be equally yoked.Ah, so you are suggesting that your right to own a machine gun is God-given?