F
FCEGM
Guest
“Utter lack”? OTC, the crucifixion as related in St. John’s Gospel is quite full; your remark reminded me of this from another Catholic forum:. . .
Is there an explanation regarding the utter lack of any mention of Mary and her role after the Virgin Birth?
Two other clues in chapter 19 of St. John’s Gospel remarkably suggest that Jesus had more in mind than his mother’s well being when, dying on the cross, he addressed both the [w]oman, recalling the woman of Genesis, and the disciple: [a]t the place where he had been crucified there was a garden… (Jn 19:41) is the first clue. This is reminiscent of the garden of the fall (Gn 3) where stood Adam, Eve and the tree with forbidden fruit. The New Adam, the New Eve and the new tree - the cross - were on Calvary. The second clue is the “replacement” of the murdered child on Calvary (Jn 19:26-27). This has its antecedent in Eve’s words (Gn 4:25): ‘because God has granted me other offspring… in place of Abel, since Cain killed him.’ Mary received a new son on Calvary in place of her Son, being murdered, just as Eve, newly expelled from the garden, received Seth in place of her murdered son Abel. Catholics, Orthodox and perhaps some others are well aware that the Virgin Mary and other saints draw our attention to Jesus. It should be noted that nearly the last thing Jesus did on his cross was to draw our attention to St. John and the Blessed Virgin Mary.